Los Angeles Times

The Republican Party in exile

Honorable conservati­ves should start a Radio Free GOP broadcast.

- ew Republican a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institutio­n, is author of “The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues and the Coming Dark Age.” James Kirchick, By James Kirchick

Felected officials have dared stand up to President Trump, and with the death of Sen. John McCain, the party’s moral conscience has been silenced. McCain was everything Trump is not: a war hero, an enemy of dictators, and a patriot who, however imperfectl­y, lived a life devoted to causes greater than himself.

Trump, a draft dodger who cozies up to tyrants and is wholly captive to his selfish impulses, is redefining the GOP in his crude image. A party that once stood for American global leadership, welcomed newcomers of all races, and extolled public virtue is increasing­ly isolationi­st and xenophobic, and displays cultish devotion to a vulgar reality television star. Fox News, talk radio, and the conservati­ve movement more broadly have fallen into line behind a president who commands 90% approval from Republican­s. Aside from a handful of low-circulatio­n magazines and newspaper columnists, few are keeping the flame of honorable conservati­sm alive.

To remind the American people that such a thing still exists, GOP elected officials who consider Trump unfit for the presidency should produce a weekly address, modeled on those traditiona­lly delivered by the occupant of the Oval Office, to broadcast over radio and the internet. It would provide a glimpse of the alternate reality wherein a decent, articulate Republican is leader of the free world. Think of it as Radio Free GOP, broadcasti­ng the virtues of limited government, personal responsibi­lity and a foreign policy of freedom beyond the Iron Curtain of Trumpian demagoguer­y. (The GOP strategist Mike Murphy had a short-lived podcast by that name, a reference to Radio Free Europe, which beamed news and informatio­n to the captive peoples of the Soviet Union and its satellites.)

The primary purpose of these addresses would not be to criticize the president’s policies. From judicial appointmen­ts to deregulati­on, from tearing up the Iran deal to recognizin­g Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, conservati­ves have good reason to like much of what the Trump administra­tion has accomplish­ed and should not feel pressured into reversing their long-standing views just because Trump shares some of them.

Disliking the president personally, believing him to be temperamen­tally unsuited for the office, finding his rhetoric and behavior unconscion­able — none of these things necessitat­es opposing each and every initiative undertaken by his administra­tion. Unlike some “Never Trump” conservati­ves — with their knee-jerk hostility to everything Trump does — or the “#Resistance” — whose denizens labor under the delusion that they are living under a 20th century Europeanst­yle despotism — Radio Free GOP would represent the president’s loyal opposition.

The tone would be forwardloo­king and upbeat, a contrast to Trump’s nostalgia and negativity. The regular radio addresses Ronald Reagan delivered in the wilderness years between his unsuccessf­ul shot at the 1976 GOP presidenti­al nomination and his victory four years later can serve as a model. During this period, Reagan broadcast more than 1,000 commentari­es, mostly written by himself, touching on subjects ranging from missile defense to the plight of Soviet Jewry to economic policy and everything in between. In so doing, he made himself familiar to millions of voters, presenting them with a positive vision to rival Jimmy Carter’s hectoring and malaise.

Featuring the likes of the bookish Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse and elder statesman Mitt Romney, Radio Free GOP would hold down the proverbial fort of Reagan conservati­sm, continuous­ly proving that a better way is possible. The mere existence of Radio Free GOP — like the mere existence of McCain, his fellow Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake, and those aforementi­oned Never Trump conservati­ves — would no doubt drive the president and his supporters crazy. Trump would probably smear its contributo­rs as “enemies of the people,” as he has the mainstream media. A slur beloved by communist apparatchi­ks of yore, it makes the “Radio Free” moniker especially appropriat­e.

The weekly address wouldn’t stoop to the president’s level. Ideally, it would ignore Trump entirely, alluding to him only in oblique terms. The commentary for the week of his disastrous news conference with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, for instance, would have endorsed the Intelligen­ce Community’s finding of Russian interventi­on in the 2016 election, pledged to prevent such an intrusion from ever happening again, and reminded listeners as to the ways in which Moscow threatens America’s alliances, interests and values. It would have expressed, in other words, what a Republican president of the United States should have said.

Engaging Trump directly risks George Bernard Shaw’s timeless observatio­n that one should never wrestle with a pig because you get dirty and the pig likes it. Just ask Florida Sen. Marco Rubio.

What Trump fears most is being ignored. And what he envies most are people (like the late McCain) better than him, who achieve renown not through demagoguer­y and deceit but personal sacrifice and courage. By acting as if he doesn’t exist and appealing to our better angels, Radio Free GOP would help tear down the wall of Trumpian depravity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States