Los Angeles Times

Could Mississipp­i turn blue?

- By Elizabeth Shackelfor­d

At President Trump’s shameful rally in Southaven, Miss., on Tuesday, the state was once again portrayed as representi­ng the worst of us. Within hours, video clips went viral of the crowd laughing and applauding as the president mocked Christine Blasey Ford, a woman whose claim of sexual assault by Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, even most Republican­s found credible.

And why wouldn’t we expect Mississipp­i to embody the worst of what the Republican Party has become? It consistent­ly ranks in the top three most conservati­ve states in the country. It has voted for Republican presidents for nearly four decades and elected only Republican senators since 1988. It’s no wonder the Democratic Party pays the state no mind.

But we are in an era when we should expect the politicall­y unexpected. And the numbers suggest that change is within reach — even in Mississipp­i.

Come November, Mississipp­i could send not one but two Democrats to the U.S. Senate. Think that’s impossible? Then you should ask why Trump was stumping in this deep red state in the first place.

Thank Trump for this much: Voters are paying attention today. Republican­s have nothing to show for their years in power in the state. Mississipp­i continues to rank at the bottom in nearly every indicator of success, including health, education, economy and infrastruc­ture. It has the highest poverty rates, the lowest median income and the highest rate of uninsured. So the electorate has a lot to gain from Democratic policies.

As with many things in the South, the vote traditiona­lly splits along racial lines, so the Democratic voter base in Mississipp­i (38% African American) is actually larger than in Alabama (26% African American), where Democrat Doug Jones won the special election to fill Jeff Sessions’ Senate seat last December.

An NBC poll shows the overall party gap closing in Mississipp­i too. Only 51% indicated they would vote Republican in this midterm, after more than 58% voted for Trump in 2016. Add in Trump’s performanc­e Tuesday, which will resonate with his most committed base but likely put off some white female voters. If Democrats make inroads with white women, they’re within spitting distance of a double win.

In a rare occurrence, both Mississipp­i Senate seats are on the ballot this November because Sen. Thad Cochran stepped down April 1.

Mike Espy, a conservati­ve Democrat, is running for that vacant seat. Espy, who served in Congress from 1987 to 1993 and as secretary of Agricultur­e under President Clinton from 1993 to 1994, would be the first African American senator from Mississipp­i since Reconstruc­tion. He is running in a nonpartisa­n special election against two Republican­s who are competing for the GOP vote. The top two candidates will go to a runoff later in November.

David Baria, a progressiv­e Democrat, is trying to unseat Republican Sen. Roger Wicker, so he is considered more of a long shot. Wicker, however, only pulled 43% in the NBC poll — a poor showing for such a longtime incumbent. Baria was a trial lawyer who has been active in statehouse politics for a decade and has consistent­ly won in a primarily Republican area. He already had 15% of the white vote statewide in an internal poll conducted in August, and his name recognitio­n and donations have only increased since then. Meanwhile, Wicker has ignored invitation­s to debate and made little effort to campaign.

Both Democratic campaigns believe that if they get high voter turnout from the African American community — meeting or exceeding their percentage of the population as a whole — they only need 20% to 22% of the white vote to win.

Espy and Baria are very different candidates, and their natural constituen­cies don’t necessaril­y align. As an African American, Espy will energize the African American community, but in today’s Mississipp­i, his race will still be a barrier to peeling away white votes. Baria’s progressiv­e positions could be off-putting to independen­ts who dislike Trump but are socially conservati­ve. But if each candidate convinces their constituen­cies that it’s vital this year to vote for Democrats in both races, the amplifying effect could push both over the finish line. Jointly campaignin­g on the cause — two Democratic seats are better than one — could be a powerful strategy in an election where so many races are competing for national attention and resources.

Democratic strategist­s and donors have ignored the Bible Belt for too long. These campaigns are still largely overlooked and underfunde­d, but upsets happen. Sen. Jones’ win in that hotly contested Alabama special election should be a wake-up call to Democrats: Don’t cede the South to Trump.

Mississipp­i Republican Party Chairman Lucien Smith scoffed at the idea of an Alabama-style upset, stating: “I’m about as likely to grow wings and fly as Democrats are to win a Senate seat in Mississipp­i.”

What better rebuke of the sham the Republican Party has become than to prove him wrong. Twice over.

Elizabeth Shackelfor­d, born and raised in Mississipp­i, was a U.S. diplomat until she resigned in protest of Trump administra­tion policies last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States