Los Angeles Times

White House confident on Kavanaugh confirmati­on

Two undecided Republican senators praise new FBI report on allegation­s against high court nominee.

- By Chris Megerian, Jennifer Haberkorn and Sarah D. Wire

WASHINGTON — Republican­s said they were confident they had the votes to place Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the U.S. Supreme Court — if only by the narrowest margin in the last century — after senators spent a tense day on Capitol Hill reviewing an FBI report into allegation­s of sexual assault and misconduct against President Trump’s nominee.

Two key Republican­s, Sens. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Susan Collins of Maine, praised the FBI’s work, brushing aside concerns from Democrats that the allegation­s weren’t adequately scrutinize­d.

Neither of the two announced how they would vote, nor did Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a third Republican who had said she was undecided.

But the tone of the comments from Collins (“It appears to be a very thorough investigat­ion”) and Flake (“We’ve seen no additional corroborat­ing informatio­n” to back up the charges against Kavanaugh) encouraged Republican­s.

If two of the three undeclared Republican­s vote for the nomination, it would have 50 votes — enough to put Kavanaugh on the high court, since Vice President Mike Pence could cast a deciding vote in the case of a tie.

Amid protests and dueling news conference­s, the uncertaint­y about the outcome left Capitol Hill charged with suspense before a key procedural vote on the nomination, scheduled for Friday morning.

The result of that vote will all but decide whether Trump’s choice will reach the court and, his supporters hope, push it in a more conservati­ve direction. Lawmakers typically — although not always — go the same way on both preliminar­y votes and final passage, especially on an issue as highprofil­e as the Kavanaugh confirmati­on.

If the nomination clears that hurdle, a final vote is to take place on Saturday, providing the conclusion to one of the most bitter partisan battles of the #MeToo era, which has brought concerns about gender equality and sexual assault to the forefront of the country’s political and cultural stages.

A possible hitch arose Thursday night when Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who supports Kavanaugh, revealed his daughter is getting married in his home state Saturday evening and that he will not be in D.C. to vote. If the count on Kavanaugh ends up being tight, that might force GOP leaders to postpone again, perhaps until Monday.

The White House last week ordered the FBI to do a limited supplement­al investigat­ion of Kavanaugh after pressure from the three undecided Republican senators, who had threatened to withhold their votes.

The probe focused on two allegation­s from Kavanaugh’s youth: that he had assaulted Christine Blasey Ford, now a Palo Alto University professor, who testified in an explosive Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Sept. 27; and that he had exposed himself to classmate Deborah Ramirez at a dorm party at Yale. He has denied the allegation­s.

Democrats and Republican­s took turns Thursday visiting a secure room on Capitol Hill that held a single copy of the FBI’s report, which includes about 46 pages summarizin­g interviews with nine people.

Senators could read the report or discuss it with a handful of staff members authorized to review the document, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) refused to make it public despite urging from both sides of the aisle.

Republican­s said there was no corroborat­ion for the allegation­s against Kavanaugh, a judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, and they blamed the Democrats for trying to stall. “This is a search-and-destroy mission,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas). “This is not a search for the truth.”

Democrats, already inclined to believe the women who have accused Kavanaugh, said the investigat­ion was incomplete, pointing to potential witnesses who were not contacted.

“The most notable part of this report is what’s not in it,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. “It looks to be a product of an incomplete investigat­ion that was limited.”

Outside the secure room, Capitol Hill was awash in protests. Hundreds gathered in one of the Senate office buildings on Thursday afternoon, filling the atrium and lining the railings on floors above, to denounce Kavanaugh and Republican­s. More showed up outside the Supreme Court building, where Kavanaugh may serve as the second justice nominated by Trump.

Unlike Trump’s other nominee, Neil M. Gorsuch, whose confirmati­on process was highly partisan but never in doubt, Kavanaugh, if he wins, would likely set a rancorous record.

Until now, the narrowest confirmati­on in the modern era came in 1991, when Justice Clarence Thomas won despite allegation­s of sexual misconduct levied by professor Anita Hill. At this point, the best Kavanaugh could do would be to match Thomas’ 52-48 tally, but the margin will likely be closer.

On Thursday, one of the two Democratic senators who had not yet declared a position, Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, joined her party in saying she would vote no.

She said in a statement that “both sides horribly handled the process around this nomination,” but added that when Ford testified, “I heard the voices of women I have known throughout my life who have similar stories of sexual assault and abuse.”

And she criticized Kavanaugh’s demeanor at the hearing last week in which he denied Ford’s accusation, saying that his statements “called into question Judge Kavanaugh’s current temperamen­t, honesty and impartiali­ty.”

Kavanaugh’s angry tone at the hearing also drew criticism from retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, now 98, who said at an appearance in Florida that he had supported the nomination until last week’s hearing. “His performanc­e in the hearings ultimately changed my mind,” Stevens said, according to the Palm Beach Post.

Heitkamp’s announceme­nt left only one Democrat undeclared: Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, who is seeking reelection in a state where Trump is popular. He refused Thursday to indicate which way he was leaning after visiting the secure room with the report.

“I’m going through it, and I have more that I have to go through tomorrow morning,” he said.

Democratic Senate sources said Manchin was not expected to cast the deciding vote, which means Republican­s would need to find enough votes in their own ranks to get to 50.

Trump said Thursday that appeasing Democrats would be impossible.

“This is now the 7th time the FBI has investigat­ed Judge Kavanaugh,” he tweeted. “If we made it 100, it would still not be good enough for the Obstructio­nist Democrats.”

FBI background checks usually do not examine events before a nominee turns 18, the period in which Ford alleges she was assaulted by Kavanaugh. She said that in the summer of 1982, when she was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, he and a friend drunkenly pushed her into a room at a party. Kavanaugh climbed on top of her and tried to remove her clothes, Ford said, covering her mouth when she tried to shout for help.

FBI agents did not interview Ford or Kavanaugh for their supplement­al investigat­ion. Both provided extensive testimony under oath at last week’s hearing, but Ford’s lawyers objected to the lack of an FBI interview.

“We are profoundly disappoint­ed that after the tremendous sacrifice she made in coming forward, those directing the FBI investigat­ion were not interested in seeking the truth,” they said in a statement.

Ten people were contacted by the FBI for the investigat­ion, and nine were interviewe­d.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, said “we didn’t learn anything new” from the FBI report.

She told reporters that the White House was pleased with the way the FBI conducted its latest investigat­ion, and dismissed criticism that the FBI did not interview all the potential witnesses.

“We allowed the FBI to do exactly what they do best,” she said. “We haven’t micromanag­ed this process.”

 ?? Erik S. Lesser EPA/Shuttersto­ck ?? SEN. LISA MURKOWSKI (R-Alaska) is one of three key Republican senators who have not said how they will vote on Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on. A procedural vote is scheduled for Friday morning.
Erik S. Lesser EPA/Shuttersto­ck SEN. LISA MURKOWSKI (R-Alaska) is one of three key Republican senators who have not said how they will vote on Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on. A procedural vote is scheduled for Friday morning.
 ?? Erik S. Lesser EPA/Shuttersto­ck ?? PROTESTERS fighting nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s possible confirmati­on demonstrat­ed at a Senate office building, above, and outside the Supreme Court.
Erik S. Lesser EPA/Shuttersto­ck PROTESTERS fighting nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s possible confirmati­on demonstrat­ed at a Senate office building, above, and outside the Supreme Court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States