Los Angeles Times

Standing down

-

Re “Kavanaugh heads for confirmati­on,” Oct. 6

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) relinquish­ed her moment to be a hero.

She had the weight of the nation on her shoulders, and I cannot imagine the pressure she felt. She had the eyes and ears of the entire country on her and a once-in-a-lifetime opportunit­y to stand up and tell the truth: that despite whether or not she believed Christine Blasey Ford, it is indisputab­le that Brett Kavenaugh proved himself to be wholly biased and temperamen­tally unqualifie­d for his appointmen­t to the Supreme Court.

But instead, she put party before country and threw away the moment that would have solidified her bravery and political integrity for the rest of her life. This is a sad time for women and a tragic moment for our democracy.

Yvette Roman Davis

Los Angeles

Sens. Collins, Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) are profiles in courage and comity.

By voting to confirm Kavanaugh — a singular example of forthright­ness, impartiali­ty and judicial temperamen­t — they showed that we cannot allow “the mob,” which some might mistakenly call “the people,” to influence our representa­tives. Congress should listen to the true people, corporatio­ns, which wield their influence tastefully, with money.

By voting yes, they let the mob know that a male nominee may get emotional, but not the clearly gullible and confused women who dared protest his appointmen­t.

By voting yes, they went out on a lonely limb to embolden officehold­ers to courageous­ly dismiss women who have the gall to demand that they be taken seriously.

By voting yes, they have stepped out of Flake’s elevator and into Sen. Orrin G. Hatch’s (R-Utah). Bravo.

Linda Cordeiro

Los Angeles

Democrats upset by Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on have only themselves to blame.

In 2013, the then-Democratic majority in the Senate invoked the “nuclear option” to eliminate the 60-vote threshold for ending debate on judicial confirmati­ons except for the Supreme Court. Republican­s thus felt justified in exercising the same option in 2017 to get Neil M. Gorsuch onto the Supreme Court.

If 60 votes had been required in the Gorsuch nomination, perhaps Judge Merrick Garland would have been seen as an ideal compromise candidate by both political parties. Certainly, under a similar scenario, Kavanaugh would have had no chance of being confirmed.

Talk about being hoisted by one’s own petard.

Michael Thorpe

Oxnard

I feel sick with sadness and despair. I am 71.

As a young woman I grew up in a time when abortion wasn’t legal. Getting pregnant was the end, if not of your life, of all opportunit­y to become something. It meant forced marriage, dropping out of school, being shipped off to have the baby somewhere else so you didn’t shame your family, or getting a back-alley abortion. It meant shame.

I did not think it was fair to bring up allegation­s from high school. People hopefully mature and become responsibl­e adults. For me, this confirmati­on hearing was about Kavanaugh’s stance on the right to an abortion.

For generation­s we have been fighting for reproducti­ve freedom. It is an underpinni­ng of autonomy for women. I feel sick over what Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on means for women in the future.

Gale Jaffe

Los Angeles

Prove us wrong, Justice Kavanaugh.

Show us what an ultrathin majority of the Senate sees in you that most of my fellow citizens do not. Show us that the sniveling, partisan, self-victimizin­g bully we witnessed during the recent hearings does not reflect your true judicial self.

If the nation assumes you were displaying your better self (as one usually would in a job interview), we should all be worried. Prove us wrong.

Fred Lynch

Westminste­r

 ?? Alex Wong Getty Images ?? SEN. SUSAN COLLINS after announcing last week that she was voting for Brett Kavanaugh.
Alex Wong Getty Images SEN. SUSAN COLLINS after announcing last week that she was voting for Brett Kavanaugh.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States