Los Angeles Times

Cop awarded $1.8 million

City Council approves a reduced judgment to officer who alleged sexual harassment.

- By James Queally james.queally@latimes.com Times staff writers Jack Dolan and Emily Alpert Reyes contribute­d to this report.

Los Angeles City Council approves a reduced judgment for an officer who alleged sexual harassment by her supervisor.

A Los Angeles police officer who accused an internal affairs lieutenant of sexual harassment and ordering surveillan­ce of her when she rejected his advances will receive $1.8 million from the city.

The City Council affirmed the payment for Officer Linda Allstot on Wednesday, ending a legal battle that began in 2015, court records show.

Allstot had accused Lt. Wayne Lightfoot of making unwanted sexual advances, inappropri­ately touching her and making disparagin­g remarks about the appearance of other women repeatedly while he was her supervisor in the LAPD’s Profession­al Standards Bureau from 2013 to 2015, according to her civil lawsuit.

Lightfoot also allegedly invited Allstot on vacations to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, and Lake Havasu, Ariz.

During those conversati­ons, “his eyes traveled up and down from [Allstot’s] face to her breasts,” according to the lawsuit. He also “looked up and down her body in a sexual manner” when they passed each other in hallways or spoke in his office.

Allstot also accused Lightfoot and others of retaliatin­g against her by making false complaints about her job performanc­e. The lieutenant also had other officers follow her to try to obtain evidence of wrongdoing, the lawsuit said.

Allstot eventually filed a complaint with Deputy Chief Debra McCarthy, but nothing was done, the lawsuit said.

This year, a jury awarded Allstot $3 million in damages. But the city filed a motion in June seeking a reduction, and a judge ordered Allstot to either accept the reduced figure or endure a second trial on the issue of compensati­on, Rob Wilcox, a spokesman for the city attorney’s office, said Wednesday.

In reducing the payout, Judge Richard L. Fruin Jr. ruled that Allstot would not suffer “any future pain and suffering,” said Greg Smith, an attorney representi­ng Allstot. None of the officers Allstot made complaints against faced internal discipline, Smith said.

Lightfoot retired this year and was enrolled in the city’s controvers­ial retirement program that pays police officers and firefighte­rs their salaries and pensions simultaneo­usly during the last five years of their careers, even if they are not on active duty.

The Deferred Retirement Option Program, also known as DROP, allowed Lightfoot to collect an additional $423,154 in pension checks when he left the department in February, according to data provided by the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions fund. Lightfoot also collected $102,000 in sick time while in DROP, records show.

An employee’s service or attendance record have no bearing on his or her enrollment in DROP, so Allstot’s allegation­s of harassment and misconduct against Lightfoot could not have prevented him from profiting from DROP.

City officials have said they are reviewing the program after a Times investigat­ion found police officers and firefighte­rs might have been abusing the system by taking time off for cumulative injuries after entering DROP, which allows participan­ts to file workers’ compensati­on claims and then take extended injury leaves at nearly twice their usual pay.

Allstot, a 20-year veteran of the department, remains on duty within the internal affairs unit, Smith said.

Lightfoot could not immediatel­y be reached for comment Wednesday.

In a statement, the LAPD said it was disappoint­ed with the verdict earlier this year but insisted the agency has a “zero tolerance” policy for harassment.

“The [department] requires that every employee complete annual training on sexual harassment in the workplace and the [department] provides employees a variety of ways to report any sexual harassment,” the statement read. “When any such conduct is reported, it is taken seriously and is investigat­ed by Internal Affairs.”

A department spokesman said he could not comment on any internal disciplina­ry charges brought against Lightfoot or other officers, citing state privacy laws protecting police personnel records.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States