Los Angeles Times

Don’t blame Harry Truman

-

Re “Take back president’s war powers,” Opinion, Oct. 8

Daniel R. DePetris’ contention that Congress abandoned its war-making function with President Truman’s entry into the Korean War is misplaced.

Violation of Congress’ war-making obligation goes back to Thomas Jefferson’s 1801 dispatch of U.S. warships to combat the Barbary pirates. It was evident when President Polk incited the MexicanAme­rican War by committing U.S. forces into disputed territory without congressio­nal consent.

Presidents authorized occupation­s of Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Panama, Honduras and Mexico all without declaratio­ns. There’s also the fact that since Korea, presidents repeatedly turned to Congress for authorizin­g war resolution­s and, most significan­tly, appropriat­ions to keep troops in the field.

Lawmakers have endorsed U.S. combat in Vietnam, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanista­n and elsewhere, ripping apart the idea that Congress has not been complicit all along in our military interventi­ons. Bennett Ramberg

Los Angeles The writer served as a policy analyst in the Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs in the George H.W. Bush administra­tion.

Our government has no greater power over an individual than requiring a citizen to relinquish his creator-given right to life

by having him fight in a war. That is why the Constituti­on gives Congress, the branch of government that most represents the people, the exclusive power to declare war.

Given that, it seems to me that Congress can take back its war powers from the president — which it has not exercised since it last declared war in 1941, amounting to a betrayal of trust — simply by answering this question: Can Congress legally give up its constituti­onally mandated, exclusive power and duty to declare war without a constituti­onal amendment?

If the answer is, as it should be, that Congress cannot, then it should have any military conflicts, interventi­ons or wars against other nations initiated by the president declared unconstitu­tional and, therefore, illegal. Ricardo Nicol San Clemente

Career politician­s assure their re-election by producing jobs and profits. One way to do this is to create war.

War, however, has inconvenie­nt side effects, like dead or maimed Americans and the creation of groups of people around the world who would love to do us harm. So politician­s who want only the benefits of war let the executive take the blame.

This is not what our founders intended. The military industrial complex was not yet establishe­d, and politician­s were not yet careerists, so the founders thought Congress would have no valid reason to make war unless it was a real emergency.

Times have changed dramatical­ly, and there is no turning back. The profession­al politician­s are going to push more and more responsibi­lity to the executive for decisions that may turn out badly. Dan Krimgold Manhattan Beach

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States