Los Angeles Times

A wave of criminal justice reform on state-level ballots

Voters will consider ex-felon voting rights, split jury verdicts and more

- By Jaweed Kaleem

At recent campaign rallies, President Trump has said that “law and order” is a key issue in Tuesday’s midterm election, declaring to his fervent supporters that his administra­tion is tough on crime.

But Trump’s rhetoric doesn’t necessaril­y match the type of referendum questions that will be on ballots. In states across the U.S., major criminal justice reform will be up for votes, with several that polls show have a high chance of passing.

The proposals include measures that would restore voting rights of exfelons in Florida, eliminate non-unanimous criminal juries in Louisiana and make it easier to prosecute police shootings in Washington state. Many races, including those for governor in Florida and Georgia, have also pitted pro- and anti-criminal-justice-reform candidates against each other.

“There is really a dissonance between the rhetoric on the federal level and what is actually happening in the states,” said American Civil Liberties Union deputy national political director Udi Ofer. “What we are seeing is a buildup from many years of criminal justice reform making a breakthrou­gh locally.”

Here are a few of the major criminal justice measures due to be decided Tuesday, mainly through ballot initiative­s.

Florida

Florida is one of three states where nearly all people convicted of felonies lose the right to vote even after they have completed parole or probation. In most other states, those convicted of felonies have voting rights restored after leaving prison or completing periods of parole and probation. Florida’s Amendment 4, which needs 60% of votes to pass, would give voting rights to as many as 1.5 million exfelons in the state. The law would not apply to people convicted of murder or sex crimes. Polls indicate it will pass.

Louisiana

In federal courts and 48 states, juries in felony cases must reach unanimous verdicts. Not in Louisiana, where criminal juries can come to non-unanimous decisions. The state enacted the law in 1880 after the passage of the 14th Amendment, which gave freed slaves the right to vote and serve on juries. At the state’s 1898 constituti­onal convention, lawmakers wrote the rule into the state constituti­on to “perpetuate the supremacy of the Anglo-Saxon race in Louisiana.”

If Amendment 2 passes, it will leave Oregon as the only state in the country that allows split juries in criminal trials. The amendment has drawn wide support from Democrats and Republican­s.

Washington

Washington is one of the hardest states in which to prosecute police officers in deadly shootings. Current law says police cannot be found liable for using deadly force if they did it “without malice and with a good faith belief that deadly force is justifiabl­e.”

If Initiative 940 passes Tuesday, the 1986 law’s malice standard would be removed. It would be replaced with a test that asks whether a “reasonable” officer would use deadly force and whether the officer “in good faith believed that the use of deadly force was warranted.” The potential new law would mandate that shootings and other deadly uses of force go under independen­t investigat­ion by people outside the police department­s in question. It would also make police receive training in de-escalation and mental health issues in regard to crime suspects.

Colorado

Similar to the U.S. Constituti­on, the Colorado Constituti­on bans slavery and involuntar­y servitude “except as a punishment for crime.” Amendment A would take away that exception.

Ohio

Up for vote is Issue 1, which would make all drug possession a misdemeano­r instead of a felony. Supporters say it would decriminal­ize addiction and allow the state to use its budget to treat addicts instead of sending them to prison. Opponents say it’s too lax on drugs. They say the possibilit­y of a felony conviction is a good deterrent for drug use.

Marsy’s Law

This victims’ rights proposal will be voted on in Nevada, Oklahoma, Florida, Kentucky, Georgia and North Carolina. The law would expand the definition of a victim to include “any spouse, parent, grandparen­t, child, sibling, grandchild or guardian” of a person targeted by a crime. Proponents say it would improve the treatment of victims’ families by allowing them to receive fuller informatio­n on criminal proceeding­s. Opponents say it would take away resources from criminal investigat­ions and victims more directly affected by crimes.

Marijuana

The national trend of marijuana legalizati­on could continue Tuesday as voters in Michigan, North Dakota, Utah and Missouri decide on marijuana-related measures. In Michigan and North Dakota, recreation­al legalizati­on is on the ballot. Utah and Missouri voters will decide on legalizati­on for medical uses.

jaweed.kaleem@latimes.com Twitter: @jaweedkale­em

 ?? Mark Boster Los Angeles Times ?? LYNETTE DUNCAN is in Santa Ana in 2015 after opposing parole for the killer of her father and sister. Her effort was backed by the man behind Marsy’s Law, a victims’ rights measure on several state ballots this year.
Mark Boster Los Angeles Times LYNETTE DUNCAN is in Santa Ana in 2015 after opposing parole for the killer of her father and sister. Her effort was backed by the man behind Marsy’s Law, a victims’ rights measure on several state ballots this year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States