Los Angeles Times

Reform LAUSD, or pay more

-

Re “LAUSD chief aims to reshape system,” Nov. 6

Reporting on the proposed reorganiza­tion of the Los Angeles Unified School District reflects the fact that the district must transform so it can meet its fundamenta­l obligation­s to Los Angeles’ children and the public at large.

The new LAUSD administra­tion must put its fiscal house in order or risk having to ask taxpayers for more money in exchange for drastic reforms. It is a fact that LAUSD stakeholde­rs — including the Los Angeles County Office of Education, the California Department of Education and others — acknowledg­e the district is on poor fiscal footing. Further, parents and families are speaking with their feet after years of missed opportunit­ies by exploring other school districts and placing their children in public charter schools.

Now, for the first time in recent memory, this complicate­d institutio­n has a chance for real change that benefits students, families, communitie­s and its own personnel. The children and families of LAUSD deserve at least that much.

Alex Johnson

Los Angeles

The writer is a member of the Los Angeles County Board of Education.

As a former teacher and administra­tor, retired after 35 years with LAUSD, I can only say this latest plan to divide the district into 32 “networks” certainly sounds like rearrangin­g the deck chairs on the Titanic — again.

Over my years in the district our leaders experiment­ed with areas, regions, divisions and more. None made any real difference or lasted long enough to see if there could be an effect. Each was passed off as a way to improve instructio­n.

Perhaps the district should listen to teachers and reduce class size. Along with more school nurses, psychologi­sts, and librarians, that could better bridge the achievemen­t gap that now exists.

Doris Dent

Northridge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States