Los Angeles Times

Mixed vote outcome for Netanyahu

Likud primary leaves Israeli premier with as many rivals as allies in party’s leadership.

- By Noga Tarnopolsk­y Tarnopolsk­y is a special correspond­ent.

JERUSALEM — Embattled Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, dogged by corruption allegation­s, received mixed results Wednesday in a primary election for fellow Likud party candidates.

After almost 24 hours of vote counting, Netanyahu, who was reelected party leader four years ago and was not a candidate on Tuesday, now finds himself with as many rivals as allies in Likud’s top leadership.

The top slot in this week’s balloting was won by the independen­t-minded Yuli Edelstein, speaker of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, who has made his name as a flag bearer for decorum and good government, and has not shied away from public disagreeme­nts with Netanyahu.

Other successful candidates serve even more clearly as barometers of a Likud base that may support the prime minister but is not afraid to back those who oppose him.

Gideon Saar, returning to the political arena four years after resigning as minister of education and announcing his plan to run, at some point, for prime minister, came in fourth out of the 30 candidates who are considered realistic choices for parliament.

His placement in the top five serves as evidence of significan­t support despite a campaign led by Netanyahu to remove him from contention for the top 10 posts. Netanyahu accused Saar of conspiring with Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, another disgruntle­d Likud leader, to plan a putsch against him should Netanyahu win the April election while facing criminal indictment.

Basking in what he called “the most significan­t victory in my political life,” Saar slyly taunted Netanyahu in a tweet congratula­ting Edelstein, to whom he wrote, “There is value and recognitio­n for statesmans­hip!”

At stake in the vote were the positions after Netanyahu’s on the party list, to be filled by candidates for parliament­ary seats. In April, Israeli voters will choose a party, not a candidate, to lead the country, with each party’s leader serving as its contender for the post of prime minister.

Afterward, Israel’s president normally invites the party that won the most votes to form a government.

On Wednesday, a Likud spokesman issued an announceme­nt attributab­le to “people in Netanyahu’s circles” that read “Netanyahu didn’t want Gideon Saar in the top spot — and he succeeded.”

Former Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, one of at least five top contenders who have openly spoken of their ambitions to become prime minister, proved a successful vote-getter in his first try at national, partisan elections. Barkat, a tech millionair­e who may be the wealthiest politician in Israel, enters the political fray with few allegiance­s and 10 years of well-publicized, successful stewardshi­p of Israel’s most complex city.

The imminent legal imbroglio engulfing Netanyahu threatens to strain loyalties in Likud, the leading right-wing party in Israel and one that will need coalition partners to form a future government if its support holds at current levels.

Likud now controls 30 of the Knesset’s 120 seats.

Netanyahu announced early elections when Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman quit his post in protest of measures taken to alleviate the humanitari­an crisis in the Gaza Strip and Naftali Bennett, the education minister, made a boisterous bid for the Defense Ministry before relenting.

On Tuesday, as he left Jerusalem’s central voting place, Moshe Pinchasi, a longtime Likud member in his 60s, seemed to reflect party members’ mood.

Pinchasi said that loyalty to Netanyahu was “absolutely” an important factor in his choice, but that he had “absolutely voted for Gideon Saar” too.

“I believe him when the prime minister says he is innocent,” Pinchasi said, adding, “But I don’t believe what he says about Gideon Saar.”

Netanyhu said in a statement Wednesday that he was “very pleased that Likud members have chosen a strong, impressive list good for Israel in a precise and democratic way.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States