Los Angeles Times

My shameful attraction to wielding a Glock

As long as handguns are easily available, we’ll have gun violence.

- By Charles Fleming

Several years ago I was midway through writing a piece of fiction that involved guns when I realized I didn’t know what I was talking about.

I had never handled a pistol. I hadn’t touched any kind of gun since the day at Boy Scout camp, 40 years prior, when I’d shot a .22 rifle to earn my Marksmansh­ip merit badge. The last time I’d even seen a real handgun was the night, nearly 20 years earlier, when a man stepped out of the shadows as I left a Hollywood movie screening and stuck a pistol in my belly, barking: “Give me your wallet or I’ll shoot you.”

That incident cost me $100 and a wristwatch, and it strengthen­ed my hatred of gun violence. So, it was only when it felt necessary for my work that I asked a friend who belonged to a gun club if he’d take me along for a lesson.

The club was in a downtown facility in a gritty neighborho­od. The interior was brightly lit, smelled of disinfecta­nt and was busy with high-energy customers, all male, many of them off-duty law enforcers.

I filled out some paperwork, showed my ID, rented a 9-millimeter Glock and bought a box of ammunition and a sheaf of “training silhouette­s.”

After a brief set of safety instructio­ns, I was escorted into the wretchedly loud shooting gallery, where my friend and I put on protective headphones and took our places alongside a dozen other shooters.

I lifted the Glock, breathed evenly, sighted on the silhouette­d paper bad guy facing me, and began firing.

Though I have poor eyesight and unsteady hands, I put six of the first 10 rounds into the torso of the target, three of them in the center of the chest.

My friend was delighted for me, but I had no sense of exhilarati­on. I felt unsafe. I was in a confined space with a load of loaded handguns. One twitchy finger, one guy off his meds, and I was a dead man.

I also felt dangerous. I knew nothing about guns, and had no training or experience. But I had just put several possibly fatal bullets into an imaginary thug. As we reloaded and hung new targets, I kept thinking: That’s how easy it would be to take a life.

I went home drained and depressed, and was gradually haunted by a disturbing revelation. Somewhere inside, at some dark, subterrane­an level, I had liked shooting that gun.

For days afterward, I found my mind drawn back to the gun club. I imagined pulling the trigger again, improving my skills, putting all 10 rounds into the target.

Though it shamed me, I found myself wondering what it would be like to own a Glock. I imagined having the opportunit­y to settle the score with the robber who shoved his pistol into my belly.

I know better than that. The statistics on gun violence are perfectly clear. If I am an average American, and own a handgun for protection, I am many times more likely to use the gun on my wife, child, neighbor or myself than on a bad guy. Some data show I am more likely to be shot by the bad guy with my own weapon than the other way around.

And because I am an average American, and male, I have been subject to fits of anger and depression. My thoughts have rarely turned to harming myself, and never to harming others. So I don’t believe having a handgun would have sent me on a crime spree, or found me shooting up a schoolyard.

But have I ever felt my safety or that of my wife and daughters was threatened enough that I would have drawn a gun if I had one? Have I ever been depressed enough to consider turning a gun on myself? Could I use a handgun to do the only thing it’s designed to do and take a human life?

Absolutely. There is no other honest answer to those questions. If the right set of factors had gone wrong in the right order, I could have done any or all of those things. So, I believe, could many perfectly sane people I know.

Now, with the Democratic Party flexing its newfound muscle with talk of sensible limits on gun ownership, I am heartened — and worried.

So far, the primary gun-control legislatio­n advancing in Congress is HR 8, which would extend mandatory background checks to almost all gun acquisitio­ns. The bill would require that all gun sales and transfers, including gifts, be processed by registered gun stores, and it would effectivel­y prohibit handgun ownership by those under 21 — the cohort with the highest suicide rate.

These are good steps, but are they enough? There is nothing in my background that would prevent me from buying a gun. And though it’s a long time since I was under 21, my cohort has a pretty high suicide rate, too.

Perhaps, energized by newer, younger members of the House, Democrats can turn HR 8 into law. Better still, they may build on its success by enacting even more comprehens­ive limits on gun use that will, finally, have an impact on gun violence.

Charles Fleming writes about cars and motorcycle­s for The Times, and is the author of the urban hiking guides “Secret Stairs” and “Secret Walks.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States