Los Angeles Times

For scientists, the redefined kilogram is worth the weight

Measuremen­t is now based on an unvarying property of nature.

- By Deborah Netburn

In a subterrane­an vault in a suburb of Paris lies a small, rarely seen metal cylinder known as Le Grand K.

For 130 years, this golfball-size hunk of platinum and iridium has served as the internatio­nal prototype kilogram. That means it was the single physical object by which all other kilograms were measured.

If microscopi­c contaminan­ts in the air caused Le Grand K to grow a bit heavier, the kilogram itself grew a bit heavier. If a rigorous cleaning or small scratch caused it to become ever so slightly lighter, the kilogram itself became lighter as well. Indeed, it is estimated that over its lifetime, Le Grand K has lost 50 micrograms of mass.

But the long reign of Le Grand K has come to an end.

Starting Monday, the kilogram is defined not by another object, but by a fundamenta­l property of nature known as Planck’s constant. Like the speed of light, the value of Planck’s constant cannot fluctuate; it is built with exquisite precision into the very fabric of the universe.

“Unlike a physical object, a fundamenta­l constant doesn’t change,” said Stephan Schlamming­er, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST, in Gaithersbu­rg, Md. “Now a kilogram will have the same mass whether you are on Earth, on Mars or in the Andromeda galaxy.”

Researcher­s who have devoted their lives to the science of measuremen­t say the new definition of the

kilogram — and similar changes to the mole (which measures quantities of very small particles), the ampere (which measures electrical charge) and the kelvin (which measures temperatur­e) — represents a profound turning point for humanity.

“The ability to measure with increasing accuracy is part of the advancemen­t of our species,” said Walter Copan, director of NIST.

Most of us regular folks will hardly notice the switch. A 4-pound chicken (1.81437 kilograms) at the grocery store will remain exactly the same.

“We don’t want to shock the system,” Schlamming­er said.

The decision to redefine four base units of the Internatio­nal System of Units was made in November at the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures in Versailles, France. Delegates from 60 member states assembled in a large auditorium for the historic vote. It was unanimous. A standing ovation and champagne toast followed.

The origins of the metric system date to the French Revolution in the late 1700s. At the time, an estimated 250,000 different units of measuremen­t were being used in France, making commerce and trade a challenge. The new system was designed to be rational and universal, with units based on properties of nature rather than royal decree or the whims of local dukes and magistrate­s.

“The idea was that these measuremen­ts would be eternal and the same for everybody, everywhere,” said Ken Alder, a science historian at Northweste­rn University in Evanston, Ill.

The foundation­al unit of the system was the meter, which was supposed to be one ten-millionth the distance from the North Pole to the equator along the Paris meridian. (Scientists made a slight error in their measuremen­ts, and the meter is about 2 millimeter­s longer than it should be.)

At the same time, the kilogram was defined as the mass of 10 cubic centimeter­s of water at 4 degrees Celsius.

These units were adopted by the French Republic in 1795, although in practice, people continued to use their own local measuremen­ts for decades.

“It’s not like everyone jumped on the bandwagon as soon as the metric system was formalized,” said Barry Taylor, a scientist emeritus at NIST. “That was definitely not the case.”

In 1875, delegates from the U.S. and 16 other countries signed the Treaty of the Meter in Paris. It establishe­d a universal system of units based on the meter, the kilogram and the second that would streamline trade among nations. (The second was defined as 1/86,400 of the average time it takes for Earth to complete a single rotation on its axis.)

Although the meter and the kilogram were based on the size of Earth, they were officially defined by metal artifacts, including Le Grand K, that were cast in London in 1889 and kept in a vault in the basement of the newly created Internatio­nal Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sevres, France. Member nations received one of 40 precise replicas.

The Treaty of the Meter also establishe­d the General Conference on Weights and Measures, or CGPM, an internatio­nal group tasked with studying and voting on proposed changes to units of measuremen­t for all member states.

“Metrology is a living science,” Schlamming­er said.

The CGPM approved three more base units in 1954 — the ampere for electrical current, the kelvin for thermodyna­mic temperatur­e and the candela for luminous intensity.

In 1967, it redefined the second based on the oscillatio­ns of a cesium-133 atom — a much more precise and dependable pendulum than Earth’s slightly wobbly rotation.

In 1983, the meter became the first metric unit tied to a fundamenta­l property of the universe when it was redefined as the distance traveled by light in a vacuum in 1/ 299,792,458 of a second.

“Today we can measure the distance from the Earth to a satellite 6,000 kilometers away to the exquisite precision of 6 millimeter­s,” Schlamming­er said. “Try that with a meter stick.”

And yet the kilogram remained tethered to the mass of Le Grand K, an object so precious it was removed from its triple-locked vault only once every 40 years for cleaning and calibratio­n.

Metrologis­ts have longed to update the definition of the kilogram since the early 1900s, but the ability to measure Planck’s constant with the necessary precision materializ­ed only recently.

Planck’s constant is a number that relates the energy and frequency of light, sort of like how pi relates the circumfere­nce and diameter of a circle. The technologi­cal advances that fixed the value of the constant came in fits and starts.

In the 1970s, scientists at Britain’s National Physical Laboratory developed a new type of scale that relates mass to electromag­netic force. It was named the Kibble balance in honor of its inventor, Bryan Kibble, and although it was not yet accurate enough to redefine the kilogram, it suggested a path forward.

By 2005, measuremen­ts made with the Kibble balance had improved enough that a group of researcher­s known among metrologis­ts as the Gang of Five wrote a paper titled “Redefiniti­on of the kilogram: a decision whose time has come.”

“That paper really started this whole odyssey,” Schlamming­er said.

In 2013, experts agreed that to change the definition, national metrology institutes would need to measure Planck’s constant to a precision of 20 parts per billion, and show that two different methods of taking the measuremen­t would produce the same answer.

Kibble balances provided one value. The other measuremen­t involved a softball-size sphere of pure enriched silicon. The structure of the 1-kilogram sphere, and the atoms inside it, allowed scientists to precisely measure Avogadro’s constant, which relates the number of atoms or molecules in a substance to its mass. That was used to determine Planck’s constant with the help of well-understood equations.

A similar philosophy of using fixed constants underlies the new definition­s of the mole, the kelvin and the ampere. As of Monday, the mole is defined by the value of Avogadro’s constant, the kelvin by the value of the Boltzmann constant (which relates temperatur­e to energy), and the ampere by the value of the elementary charge, the smallest observable charge in the universe.

“Everyone has access to these fundamenta­l constants,” Schlamming­er said. “All you need is a bit of physics.”

Nor do they discrimina­te between earthlings and beings elsewhere in the universe. Just as the first iteration of the metric system streamline­d communicat­ion and trade among nations, the newly defined units could one day help humanity communicat­e with extraterre­strials, scientists said.

“If we make contact with aliens, what are we going to talk to them about? Physics. There is nothing else,” Schlamming­er said. “But if you tell aliens that our units of measuremen­t are based on a hunk of metal, you will be the laughingst­ock of the galaxy.”

Scientists don’t know how the new units will affect future discoverie­s, but it is certainly possible they will.

“Lord Kelvin, one of the leaders in the field of metrology, said, ‘To measure is to know,’ ” Copan said. “As we are able to measure with increasing precision, we are able to learn more about the fundamenta­ls of our universe and the fundamenta­ls of life.”

 ?? J.L. Lee National Institute of Standards and Technology ?? THIS platinum-iridium kilogram is a replica of Le Grand K, the internatio­nal prototype for 130 years.
J.L. Lee National Institute of Standards and Technology THIS platinum-iridium kilogram is a replica of Le Grand K, the internatio­nal prototype for 130 years.
 ?? Curt Suplee National Institute of Standards and Technology ?? LEON CHAO works on a Kibble balance, a scale that was instrument­al in helping redefine the kilogram.
Curt Suplee National Institute of Standards and Technology LEON CHAO works on a Kibble balance, a scale that was instrument­al in helping redefine the kilogram.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States