Los Angeles Times

Durst lawyers want to block ‘junk science’

Defense seeks to bar testimony linking client to anonymous ‘cadaver’ note in Susan Berman’s death.

- By Alene Tchekmedyi­an

Around the time Susan Berman was shot and killed in 2000, Beverly Hills police received an anonymous note that listed her Benedict Canyon address above one word: “cadaver.”

The mysterious letter, written by hand in block lettering, was postmarked the day before Berman’s body was found in her home, a single bullet through the back of her head.

It was a key piece of evidence that ultimately led investigat­ors to her best friend, the eccentric real estate scion Robert Durst, who is accused of killing her.

With his murder trial coming up in January, Durst’s defense attorneys are seeking to bar testimony from experts called by the prosecutio­n who would identify Durst as the note’s author, arguing that the science of handprinti­ng — which examines block lettering rather than cursive — is unreliable. The lawyers are relying on the hodgepodge analyses of a now-retired Los Angeles Police Department handwritin­g analyst who within a two-year span formed conflictin­g conclusion­s about who wrote the cadaver note.

“We think it’s junk science,” said Dick DeGuerin, one of Durst’s defense attorneys.

In a court filing, prosecutor­s said it’s “patently absurd” to argue that one expert’s mistake could destroy the integrity of an entire field, and asked the judge to deny the motion. A hearing is set for next week.

The drama dates back to February 2001, when the LAPD’s William Leaver concluded it was “highly probable” that the cadaver note was written by Berman’s manager, Nyle Brenner. A supervisor, Karen Chiarodit, signed off on Leaver’s work but later admitted that her review was more akin to a rubber stamp.

Several months later, in October, Durst was added to the mix, but there was no definitive conclusion.

“At this point with the limited [exemplars] on Durst, there are more similariti­es w/Brenner. Need more,” Leaver wrote, according to the defense court filing.

Investigat­ors soon traveled to Galveston, Texas, to get more writing samples from Durst. Prosecutor­s said in court documents that Durst made a “significan­t effort” to disguise his writing, drawing each letter from the bottom up. Some characters he wrote backward, prosecutor­s said.

“Is that the way you normally write?” Chiarodit asked, according to the prosecutio­n’s filing. “I hope so,” Durst said. After reviewing those extra samples, prosecutor­s said, Leaver concluded the following June that Durst probably wrote the note. Faced with contradict­ory theories, Leaver quickly fol

lowed his analysis of Durst’s writing with a conclusion that it was now “highly probable” that Brenner had not written the missive to police.

In 2014, prosecutor­s sought two experts to review the case with far more writing samples than Leaver had. Neither knew about Leaver’s analyses, prosecutor­s said, and both pointed the finger at Durst.

Prosecutor­s argued that the professor the defense team is using to undermine the reliabilit­y of handwritin­g analysis is not a qualified expert.

Despite the inconsiste­ncies in the writing analyses over the years, the cadaver note has striking similariti­es to a letter Durst sent to Berman in 1999. In both samples, the writing is in all capital letters, and Beverly Hills is misspelled as “Beverley Hills.”

In the final episode of a six-part HBO series about Durst and his links to three deaths, he said he wrote the letter to Berman but denied writing the cadaver note.

Director Andrew Jarecki held up blown-up versions of the misspelled city from the envelope of each and asked, “Can you tell me which one you didn’t write?” “No,” Durst responded. Within minutes, the prosecutor’s filing said, Durst went into a restroom wearing his microphone.

“There it is, you’re caught,” he said.

DeGuerin would not address the similariti­es between the two letters but dismissed the HBO series as a “heavily edited” show made for entertainm­ent.

“It was great entertainm­ent, but that’s what it was,” DeGuerin said. “It was not a documentar­y.”

Prosecutor­s have argued that Durst killed Berman to keep her from telling authoritie­s what she knew about his involvemen­t in the 1982 disappeara­nce of his wife, Kathleen, from New York.

Although her body has never been recovered, prosecutor­s, along with Kathleen’s family, think she was killed by her husband. Durst was never charged in connection with her disappeara­nce. Her family has filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against him.

 ?? Jae C. Hong Pool Photo ?? ROBERT DURST at a December 2016 hearing in Los Angeles. He denies writing the note in question.
Jae C. Hong Pool Photo ROBERT DURST at a December 2016 hearing in Los Angeles. He denies writing the note in question.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States