Los Angeles Times

Trump not exonerated, Mueller says

In terse testimony, he rejects the president’s claim but mostly declines to support Democrats’ narrative.

- By Chris Megerian and Jennifer Haberkorn

WASHINGTON — Robert S. Mueller III, testifying to Congress on Wednesday for the first time about the Russia investigat­ion, directly contradict­ed President Trump’s claims that he was fully cleared of any wrongdoing, but the former special counsel also denied Democrats the dramatic TV sound bites they hoped to wield against the White House.

Mueller, 74, gave mostly staccato answers and occasional­ly appeared shaky or uncertain during nearly seven hours of nationally televised back-to-back hearings in the House Judiciary and Intelligen­ce committees that focused on a 22-month investigat­ion that reached into the White House.

He dropped no new bombshells despite repeated prodding from both Republican­s and Democrats — hewing closely instead to the findings of his written report — but his terse responses still will provide ammunition for the partisan battles of the 2020 campaign.

“Did you actually totally exonerate the president?” Rep. Jerrold Nadler (DN.Y.), chairman of the Judiciary Committee, asked early in the day.

“No,” Mueller responded. Mueller then said “yes” twice when asked whether Trump could potentiall­y face charges for obstructio­n of justice or other crimes after leaving office.

Mueller said his office did

not subpoena Trump for an in-person interview after months of negotiatio­ns with the president’s lawyers had reached an impasse.

“The expectatio­n was if we did subpoena the president, he would fight the subpoena and we would be in the midst of the investigat­ion for a substantia­l period of time,” he said.

But he made clear he was not satisfied with Trump’s written answers to questions provided by the special counsel’s office in lieu of an interview.

Asked by Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.) whether Trump’s answers “were not only inadequate and incomplete” but also whether “he was not always being truthful,” Mueller responded, “I would say generally.”

Mueller also took issue with the president’s derisive characteri­zation of his investigat­ion. “It is not a witch hunt,” he said, and the Kremlin-backed efforts to boost Trump in 2016 were “not a hoax.”

The White House was quick to label Mueller’s testimony an “epic embarrassm­ent,” and the president — who previously had said he would not watch — tweeted out critique after critique.

Later, as he left the White House for a fundraiser in Wheeling, W.Va., Trump appeared exultant, telling reporters that Mueller did a “horrible” job and was a “disaster” for Democrats.

“The Democrats had nothing, and now they have less than nothing,” he said.

Mueller refused to answer scores of questions, insisting he would confine himself to the evidence disclosed in the 448-page written report that was released in redacted form in April. But he occasional­ly went further — or tripped up.

Citing the report, for example, he said Justice Department guidelines barred indictment of a sitting president.

“I’d like to ask you the reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) asked in the morning session in the Judiciary Committee.

“That is correct,” Mueller said in what seemed to suggest for the first time that he otherwise would have indicted the president.

But in the afternoon, appearing before the Intelligen­ce Committee, he issued a “correction,” saying he had incorrectl­y told Lieu that he didn’t charge the president with a crime specifical­ly because of the Office of Legal Counsel opinion.

“That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller said. “We did not reach a determinat­ion as to whether the president committed a crime.”

Mueller mostly was reluctant to render moral judgments on Trump’s conduct. But he made an exception when Rep. Mike Quigley (DIll.) asked about Trump’s frequent praise for WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign.

In the final weeks of the race, Trump hailed the antisecrec­y organizati­on as it published thousands of internal Democratic Party emails that had been hacked by Russian military intelligen­ce officers.

“‘Problemati­c’ is an understate­ment in terms of what it displays in terms of giving some, I don’t know, hope or some boost to what is and should be illegal activity,” Mueller said when asked for his reaction.

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (DBurbank), chairman of the Intelligen­ce Committee, focused on how Trump took advantage of Moscow’s hacking even though Mueller did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

“The Trump campaign officials built their messaging strategy around those stolen documents?” he asked.

“Generally, that’s true,” Mueller replied.

“And then they lied to cover it up?” Schiff went on.

“Generally, that’s true,” Mueller said again.

Mueller made clear he views the Russian intelligen­ce operation, which also used disinforma­tion on social media to target U.S. voters, as a direct threat to American democracy.

“Over the course of my career, I’ve seen a number of challenges to our democracy,” Mueller said. “The Russian government’s effort to interfere in our election is among the most serious.”

He returned to his concern a number of times. Asked later whether Moscow was continuing its malign efforts, Mueller said, “They’re doing it as we sit here.”

Mueller also ominously warned that foreign election interferen­ce could become routine in future elections. “I hope this is not the new normal, but I fear it is,” he said.

Democrats had organized the double-barreled hearings in hopes that Mueller would bring to life the often dense prose from his final report.

But the former Marine sat stiffly, displaying his reluctance to participat­e in the hearings. Mueller had said he did not want to testify on Capitol Hill, and he agreed only after Democrats issued him a subpoena.

At times, he appeared to struggle to hear the questions, asking lawmakers to repeat themselves or to slow down. He, in turn, was reminded more than once to speak into the microphone so others could hear him.

Some of Mueller’s responses could prove helpful to Democrats who hope to build support for impeachmen­t proceeding­s against the president. But he generally stopped short of supporting their attempts to paint a larger narrative about Trump’s conduct.

For example, Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) asked Mueller about Trump’s effort to have Corey Lewandowsk­i, his former campaign manager, tell Jeff Sessions, then the attorney general, to limit the investigat­ion to only future cases of foreign interferen­ce.

Mueller confirmed various details with monosyllab­ic answers — “true” or “yes” — but balked when Cicilline tried to string them all together.

“I’m not going to adopt your characteri­zation, but I would say the facts that are laid out in the report are accurate,” he said.

Republican­s largely played to Trump’s base by fiercely defending the president and attempting to undermine Mueller’s credibilit­y and that of his investigat­ion.

Rep. Doug Collins (DGa.), the Judiciary Committee’s top Republican, pressed Mueller about whether Trump was involved in the “underlying crime” of Russian meddling.

“We found insufficie­nt evidence of the president’s culpabilit­y,” Mueller said.

Several Republican­s criticized the former special counsel for drafting a lengthy report, which they said exceeded his mandate as a prosecutor tasked with black-and-white decisions about whether to bring charges.

Rep. Guy Reschentha­ler (R-Pa.) said it “flies in the face of American justice.”

Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Elk Grove) described the report as an overtly partisan statement intended to undermine the president.

“It’s starting to look like, having desperatel­y tried and failed to make a legal case against the president, you made a political case instead,” he said.

“You put it in a paper sack, lit it on fire, dropped it on our porch, rang the doorbell and ran.”

Although Mueller did little to counter most Republican criticisms, he grew animated at McClintock’s characteri­zation and flatly rejected it.

“I don’t think you have reviewed a report that is as thorough, as fair, as consistent as the report that we have in front of us,” Mueller said.

Mueller also rejected Republican accusation­s that he staffed the special counsel’s office with Democrats who were determined to take down the president.

“I have been in this business for almost 25 years, and in those 25 years I have not had occasion once to ask somebody about their political affiliatio­n,” said Mueller, who headed the FBI for 12 years and served as a senior Justice Department official before that.

“It is not done.”

 ?? Jim Lo Scalzo EPA/Shuttersto­ck ?? FORMER special counsel Robert S. Mueller III testified in back-to-back congressio­nal hearings Wednesday, warning of ongoing Russian attempts to interfere in U.S. elections. “They’re doing it as we sit here,” he said.
Jim Lo Scalzo EPA/Shuttersto­ck FORMER special counsel Robert S. Mueller III testified in back-to-back congressio­nal hearings Wednesday, warning of ongoing Russian attempts to interfere in U.S. elections. “They’re doing it as we sit here,” he said.
 ?? Chip Somodevill­a EPA/Shuttersto­ck ?? IN NEARLY seven hours of testimony, Robert S. Mueller III confined his remarks mostly to the evidence as detailed in his written report.
Chip Somodevill­a EPA/Shuttersto­ck IN NEARLY seven hours of testimony, Robert S. Mueller III confined his remarks mostly to the evidence as detailed in his written report.
 ?? Shawn Thew EPA/Shuttersto­ck ?? ROBERT MUELLER attempted to counter Republican lawmakers’ frequent criticisms of his 22-month Russia investigat­ion on only a few occasions.
Shawn Thew EPA/Shuttersto­ck ROBERT MUELLER attempted to counter Republican lawmakers’ frequent criticisms of his 22-month Russia investigat­ion on only a few occasions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States