Los Angeles Times

Animal welfare groups sue rodeo

Lawsuit alleges the San Diego County event illegally uses electric prods on tame horses

- By Lauryn Schroeder Schroeder writes for the San Diego Union-Tribune.

SAN DIEGO — Two animal welfare groups filed a lawsuit Wednesday against the Poway Rodeo, accusing workers at the annual event of illegally shocking tame horses for entertainm­ent purposes.

An Illinois nonprofit called Showing Animals Respect and Kindness, or SHARK, and the Animal Protection and Rescue League, a California nonprofit, filed the complaint in San Diego County Superior Court.

It accuses workers at the three-day event of violating municipal and state laws by electrical­ly shocking tame horses while they are in chutes, or cages, just before they’re released into the rodeo arena with a rider on top.

According to the lawsuit, this causes the horses to buck wildly, “giving these tame, domesticat­ed horses the appearance of being wild, ‘bucking broncos.’ ”

The next Poway Rodeo is scheduled for Sept. 27-28. The lawsuit seeks a temporary restrainin­g order and an injunction to prevent the rodeo from shocking horses.

In an email Wednesday, Poway Rodeo Chairman Murray Bankhead said the organizati­on does not comment on pending litigation.

Bankhead said Poway Rodeo is sanctioned by the Profession­al Rodeo Cowboys Assn., or PRCA, the largest and oldest rodeo-sanctionin­g body in the world. He said the rodeo fully complies with state and city laws.

The Poway Valley Riders Assn., the Salt River Rodeo Co. and the PRCA are also named in the suit. Officials at all three organizati­ons did not respond to messages and calls seeking comment.

According to the complaint, the California Penal Code requires a rodeo to “ensure that no electric prod or similar device is used on any animal once the animal is in the holding chute.” Poway Municipal Code also prohibits the use of electric prods or shocking devices at rodeos and specifical­ly forbids their use on animals being contained in chutes.

As evidence, the lawsuit provided screenshot­s from a video taken at the rodeo event last year.

The video, which was uploaded to YouTube in January, shows a rodeo worker holding a pronged device near horses in chutes, seconds before they were released into the arena.

The lawsuit said this device is called a “hot-shot.” It emits 5,000 volts of electricit­y across two metal prongs.

“The manufactur­er of the hot-shot, Miller Manufactur­ing, specifical­ly states on the label that it is never to be used on horses, and has stated in writing that it should never be used in a rodeo setting,” the lawsuit said. “The device is intended for specific situations involving large cows and pigs.”

Bryan Pease, an attorney representi­ng SHARK and APRL, said the incident caught on video was not an isolated event but rather a standard operating procedure for the rodeo.

“It’s common practice,” Pease said. The organizati­ons named in the lawsuit “are known to use that device in other states and jurisdicti­ons where it’s not illegal.”

The profession­al cowboys associatio­n allows the use of prods and similar devices when an animal is in a chute, according to its website, but these devices may be used only when necessary and may touch the animal only on the hip or shoulder area. The sanctionin­g organizati­on has more than 60 rules to ensure the proper care and treatment of rodeo animals.

According to the lawsuit, SHARK and APRL contacted the San Diego Humane Society about the alleged illegal activity. The organizati­on, which has the jurisdicti­on to enforce animal cruelty laws, declined to take action, the complaint said.

In a statement Wednesday, Dariel Walker, communicat­ions specialist for the Humane Society, said the organizati­on received a video and a complaint about animal cruelty at the rodeo in January. The video was reviewed by humane officers, including a certified equine investigat­or with three decades of horse handling experience, who concluded that there was no conclusive evidence of abuse.

A second enhanced video, uploaded to YouTube in February, provided additional informatio­n that was not available at the time of the first complaint.

“We explained that in any animal cruelty investigat­ion, a complaint has to be timely in order to determine possible violations,” Walker said. “Unfortunat­ely, in this case, we were advised of the alleged incident four months after the occurrence. This hampered our ability to identify the subjects or circumstan­ces of alleged violations.”

The Humane Society regularly attends events where animals are used for entertainm­ent to ensure compliance with local and state laws. Walker said this was the first time the organizati­on has received a complaint about the Poway Rodeo, and staffers are making plans to attend the next event.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States