Los Angeles Times

Farmers harvest the sun

Central Valley solar projects could help state hit climate goals

- By Sammy Roth

MARICOPA, Calif. — Jon Reiter banked the four-seat Cessna aircraft hard to the right, angling to get a better look at the solar panels glinting in the afternoon sun far below.

The silvery panels looked like an interloper amid a patchwork landscape of lush almond groves, barren brown dirt and saltbush scrub, framed by the bluegreen strip of the California Aqueduct bringing water from the north. Reiter, a renewable energy developer and farmer, built these solar panels and is working to add a lot more to the San Joaquin Valley landscape.

“The next project is going to be 100 megawatts. It’s going to be five times this size,” Reiter said.

Solar energy projects could replace some of the jobs and tax revenues that may be lost as constraine­d water supplies force California’s agricultur­e industry to scale back. In the San Joaquin Valley alone, farmers may need to take more than half a million acres out of production to comply with the Sustainabl­e Groundwate­r Management Act, which will ultimately put restrictio­ns on pumping.

Converting farmland to solar farms also could be key to meeting California’s climate change targets. That’s according to a new report from the Nature Conservanc­y, an environmen­tal nonprofit.

Working with the consulting firm Energy and En

vironmenta­l Economics, the conservanc­y tried to figure out how California could satisfy its appetite for clean energy without destroying ecological­ly sensitive lands across the American West. The report lays out possible answers to one of the big questions facing renewable energy: Which areas should be dedicated to solar panels and wind turbines, and which areas should be protected for the sake of wildlife, outdoor recreation, farming and grazing?

One takeaway from the report, released this week: California will need hundreds or maybe thousands of square miles of solar power production in the coming decades — and it would make sense to build one-third to one-half of that solar capacity on agricultur­al lands, mostly within the state.

In part, that’s because the Central Valley is more ecological­ly degraded than California’s inland deserts, where bighorn sheep, desert tortoises and golden eagles still roam across vast stretches of largely intact wilderness. The San Joaquin Valley is home to two dozen threatened and endangered species, but the landscape was almost totally reshaped by agricultur­e long ago.

California has plenty of farmland that could be converted to solar panels without harming the state’s $50-billion agricultur­e industry, clean energy advocates say. A previous report identified 470,000 acres of “least conflict” lands in the San Joaquin Valley, where salty soil, poor drainage or otherwise less-than-ideal farming conditions could make solar an attractive alternativ­e for landowners.

At least 13,000 acres of solar farms have already been built in the valley, said Erica Brand, director of the Nature Conservanc­y’s California energy program and a coauthor of the newly released “Power of Place” report.

“It’s a region with tremendous opportunit­y to advance multi-benefit solar projects,” Brand said.

Multiple benef its

For an increasing number of farmers, solar makes economic sense.

At Maricopa Orchards — a major Fresno-based grower of almonds, oranges and other crops — Reiter hatched a plan to build solar panels on thousands of acres of agricultur­al land in Kern County.

He worked with local officials to create a 6,000-acre habitat conservati­on plan, which allows solar panels on 4,000 acres of the company’s land and sets aside 2,000 additional acres for environmen­tal mitigation. The mitigation lands are now reverting back to habitat for San Joaquin kit foxes, bluntnosed leopard lizards, burrowing owls and other atrisk species.

Reiter’s vision is a work in progress: So far, only 160 acres have been developed with solar. The 20-megawatt Maricopa West solar project was built by the German company E.ON and sold to Dominion Energy of Virginia, on land adjacent to almond orchards. But Reiter, who served as Maricopa Orchards’ chief executive until earlier this year and is now a senior advisor to the company, said he’s negotiatin­g with three developers looking to build seven more solar projects. Part of the benefit of the habitation conservati­on plan, Reiter said, is that Maricopa can offer solar companies “shovel-ready” constructi­on sites with permits and mitigation lands ready to go, saving them time and money.

Endangered species also stand to benefit from the habitat plan.

“There’s going to be artificial dens, movement corridors and things of that nature. The idea is that it’s going to help them survive,” Reiter said.

Other Central Valley agricultur­al powerhouse­s have their own plans for solar.

Wonderful Co. — which grows tree nuts and owns Pom Wonderful, Fiji Water and Justin Wines — is aiming to power its operations with 100% renewable electricit­y by 2025. Wonderful opened its first solar project in 2007 and this year signed a contract with Florida-based developer NextEra Energy for a 23megawatt solar installati­on, to be built on 157 acres of fallow farmland.

Wonderful sees “tremendous potential for siting solar on agricultur­al land,” said Steven Swartz, the company’s vice president of strategy. Wonderful, owned by Beverly Hills billionair­es Stewart and Lynda Resnick, can make about as much money producing solar power over a 30-year period, Swartz said, as it can growing almonds and pistachios — two of the most lucrative crops grown in California and also two of the most water-intensive.

“In one case we’re growing an agricultur­al product that has value, and in another case we’re producing electrons that have value,” Swartz said.

Swartz added that he expects “relatively limited competitio­n” between solar and agricultur­e because there’s already so much farmland that isn’t in production in the Central Valley. Wonderful has 10,000 acres it’s keeping fallow, he said, due either to poor soil conditions or insufficie­nt water. In 2015, at the height of California’s most recent drought, Central Valley farmers kept about 1 million acres idle all year, NASA scientists estimated.

The biggest solar project being planned in the Central Valley is Westlands Solar Park, where constructi­on of the first 670 megawatts is scheduled to begin in the next few months, said Daniel Kim, vice president of regulatory and government affairs for the developer, Golden State Clean Energy. The project could eventually grow to 2,700 megawatts of power across 20,000 acres, which is larger than any solar power facility in the world today.

The massive solar project will be built on “drainage-impaired” farmlands served by Westlands Water District, where the soil has become loaded with crop-killing salts — and toxic selenium — because clay layers beneath the dirt prevent irrigation water from percolatin­g down into the undergroun­d aquifer.

“If you continue to farm these types of lands, you continue to make the drainage problems worse and worse,” Kim said.

Poor drainage and groundwate­r restrictio­ns aren’t the only reasons farmers are looking to solar power. Surface water supplies also have become increasing­ly unreliable, in part because of environmen­tal regulation­s that limit how much water can be pumped from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

Ditching fossil fuels

The Nature Conservanc­y’s “Power of Place” report doesn’t look only at farmland.

The report examines 61 scenarios for achieving California’s climate targets. They’re based on different assumption­s about how much land is protected from developmen­t across 11 Western states, how many homes add rooftop solar panels, how much lithium-ion battery prices fall, and whether California continues to require that most of its solar and wind power be produced within the state.

One of the report’s conclusion­s is that switching from fossil fuels to clean energy gets more expensive as more land is shielded from developmen­t.

For instance, annual electricit­y costs could be around $110 billion if most of California’s renewable energy is produced in-state and only legally protected areas such as national parks and wildlife refuges are off-limits to developers. Statewide electricit­y costs could rise to $125 billion if developmen­t were prohibited on other lands, such as critical habitat for endangered species and important bird areas.

But if California utilities were allowed to buy more renewable energy from other Western states, annual costs would drop to $113 billion even under the most restrictiv­e land-use rules, the report estimates. Easing landuse rules slightly would bring electricit­y costs down to $106 billion — cheaper than trying to build everything in-state, even if hardly any lands are off-limits.

“That West-wide scenario is the best-case scenario,” said Arne Olson, a senior partner at the consulting firm Energy and Environmen­tal Economics and a coauthor of the Nature Conservanc­y’s report.

The “Power of Place” report doesn’t capture every force that could shape California’s energy future. It assumes no developmen­t of offshore wind power, despite enormous potential for turbines off the Pacific Coast. It also doesn’t account for other states’ renewable energy needs, which could be substantia­l.

Still, clean energy advocates say the document could help California officials balance developmen­t with ecosystem protection as they plan for 100% climate-friendly electricit­y by 2045, the target adopted by lawmakers last year. In 2018, California received 31% of its electricit­y from renewables including solar and wind, and 20% from zero-carbon nuclear and large hydropower facilities.

The Nature Conservanc­y’s report “appears to outline thoughtful options for how to site the projects we need to meet the climate crisis,” said Shannon Eddy, executive director of the Large-Scale Solar Assn., a Sacramento trade group.

It’s gotten more difficult to build solar in recent years, Eddy said, as conservati­onists have fought projects in wilderness areas and rural residents have fought projects near their communitie­s. In February, San Bernardino County, California’s largest by area, banned the constructi­on of large solar and wind farms on more than 1 million acres of private land.

The price of continuing with business as usual, Eddy said, “is basically losing the battle on climate change.”

“We can no longer afford to fight about this. We need all the power we can get as fast as we can get it,” she said. Kim Delfino, California program director for Defenders of Wildlife, is hopeful the Nature Conservanc­y’s findings will help forestall the kinds of ecological conflicts that have slowed clean energy developmen­t in the California desert. During the renewable energy “gold rush” of the late 2000s, developers proposed dozens of solar and wind farms in unprotecte­d desert areas, fueling hard-fought battles with conservati­onists that continue today.

“We’re going to have another renewable energy boom. It’s inevitable,” Delfino said. “This will give us an opportunit­y, perhaps, to make better choices.”

Altered ecosystem

Wind Wolves Preserve, which is owned by the nonprofit Wildlands Conservanc­y, offers a unique perspectiv­e on those choices.

Spanning 93,000 acres at the southern end of the San Joaquin Valley, in the heart of the San Emigdio Mountains, the preserve is a refuge for wildlife that once roamed throughout California’s heartland, before the region became an agricultur­al mecca.

Two decades ago, 19 tule elk were reintroduc­ed at the site, part of an effort to restore a population that once numbered in the hundreds of thousands. Today, more than 300 elk call the preserve home.

Wind Wolves has also been planting Bakersfiel­d cactuses, building up what staff say is now the thirdlarge­st population of the endangered plant species. On a recent summer evening, preserve manager Melissa Dabulamanz­i drove up a narrow, winding dirt road toward Tule Elk Overlook, which provides a sweeping view of the San Joaquin Valley floor. Sitting in the back seat was Abby Hart, who leads the Nature Conservanc­y’s California agricultur­e project.

“This kind of shrub-land habitat is largely what the valley should be looking like,” Dabulamanz­i said

At Tule Elk Overlook, they got out of the car and looked out over the valley, admiring the landscape as the sun disappeare­d behind distant mountains.

Hart said solar companies, farmers and conservati­onists will need to work together to build a sustainabl­e future for this region of California.

“There’s so little remaining excellent habitat like this,” Hart said, referring to the preserve. “If we can get that solar developmen­t to happen on already disturbed lands ... that’s so much better than having it touch down in areas that are either already protected or are already serving as excellent habitat.”

 ?? Photograph­s by Al Seib Los Angeles Times ?? SILVER Y solar panels installed by a German company stand out amid lush almond grove sin Maricopa, Calif.
Photograph­s by Al Seib Los Angeles Times SILVER Y solar panels installed by a German company stand out amid lush almond grove sin Maricopa, Calif.
 ??  ?? ERICA BRAND, a director at the Nature Conservanc­y, and Jon Reiter, an advisor for Maricopa Orchards, stand between almond trees and a solar farm.
ERICA BRAND, a director at the Nature Conservanc­y, and Jon Reiter, an advisor for Maricopa Orchards, stand between almond trees and a solar farm.
 ?? Al Seib Los Angeles Times ?? THE 20-MEGAWATT Maricopa West project was built by the German firm E.ON and sold to Dominion Energy of Virginia, on land next to almond trees. For a growing number of farmers, solar makes economic sense.
Al Seib Los Angeles Times THE 20-MEGAWATT Maricopa West project was built by the German firm E.ON and sold to Dominion Energy of Virginia, on land next to almond trees. For a growing number of farmers, solar makes economic sense.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States