Qualcomm wins stay in FTC case

A federal appeals court is temporarily protecting Qualcomm from an antitrust ruling that would have forced the mobile chip maker to drastically change how it licenses key technology for connecting smartphones to the internet.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay Friday in a high-stakes case that has pitted U.S. government agencies against one another while magnifying Qualcomm’s pivotal role in an upcoming shift to ultrafast wireless connections known as 5G.

The latest twist will prevent the Federal Trade Commission from enforcing key provisions of a lower court ruling that said Qualcomm abused its portfolio of about 140,000 patents to stifle competition.

The Justice Department, joined by the Defense and Energy departments, had taken the unusual step of urging the appeals court to stay parts of that ruling in the interests of national security. They argued the ruling would hobble Qualcomm so severely that the San Diego company would have to curtail much-needed investments in the evolution to 5G, opening the door for China to gain an advantage in a crucial area of technology.

Qualcomm is a leader in the 5G transition, along with Europe-based Ericsson and Nokia and China’s Huawei, a company that has been blacklisted by the Trump administration because of suspected ties to its home country’s government.

The shift to 5G during the next decade is expected to enable advances in robotics, wearable devices such as smartwatches and smartglasses, self-driving cars and communications.

The appeals court cited concerns from the Justice, Defense and Energy departments and said Qualcomm had “demonstrated the probability of irreparable harm” if U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh’s ruling is immediately imposed. Qualcomm argued that Koh’s provisions would have unfairly eroded its revenue and potentially exposed its technological secrets. The stay will prevent that from happening while Qualcomm pursues its appeal. Oral arguments are scheduled for January.

The FTC expressed disappointment with the stay but promised to monitor Qualcomm’s business practices during the appeal.