Los Angeles Times

No House vote on impeachmen­t

After polling fellow Democrats, Pelosi reaffirms stance on impeachmen­t amid Republican pressure.

- By Jennifer Haberkorn and Sarah D. Wire Times staff writer Eli Stokols in Washington contribute­d to this report.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi reaffirms her stance on the investigat­ion despite pressure by Republican­s.

WASHINGTON — Amid growing political pressure from Republican­s, House leaders on Tuesday began seriously gauging support among Democrats for holding a vote to formally establish the impeachmen­t investigat­ion of President Trump — even through the inquiry is already underway.

But by the end of the day and after pushback from members during a closeddoor meeting in the basement of the Capitol, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) decided there would be no House vote for now, reaffirmin­g her previous stance on the issue.

“At this time, we will not be having a vote,” she said.

Her announceme­nt came as more top White House officials, including Vice President Mike Pence and Energy Secretary Rick Perry, announced their intentions to defy House subpoenas, and others in the State Department continued to provide informatio­n in the investigat­ion, putting more cracks in the White House’s attempt to build a wall of resistance.

One of those State Department officials, George Kent, told House investigat­ors Tuesday that the White House moved quickly after recalling former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitc­h on May 20, putting Ukraine policy into the hands of three people — who later called themselves “the three amigos” and were viewed as more sympatheti­c to the president — according to Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), who was in the room for Kent’s deposition.

Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of State responsibl­e for Ukraine, said that in a May 23 meeting organized by acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, it was determined that U.S. foreign policy on Ukraine would be led by U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and Energy Secretary Perry, Connolly said.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was informed of the arrangemen­t in an early June meeting in Kyiv — a proclamati­on that stunned some in the U.S. Embassy, Connolly said. Kent, meanwhile, was instructed to “lay low” and defer to the others in the following weeks, according to Connolly.

On July 25, Trump — who at the time was withholdin­g about $400 million in aid to Ukraine — asked Zelensky to investigat­e former Vice President Joe Biden on unfounded allegation­s. Disclosure of that conversati­on triggered the current House impeachmen­t inquiry.

Volker, who has since quit his position, has already offered his deposition to House investigat­ors, and Sondland is scheduled to meet with them Thursday.

Though Pelosi had previously expressed little interest in holding a vote on the impeachmen­t inquiry, Democratic leaders Tuesday began consulting with members in moderate or pro-Trump districts to gauge their appetite for a formal vote, which could be uncomforta­ble for some.

While Congress has been out of session for two weeks, polls show public support for the impeachmen­t inquiry has risen. So there was some hope that a vote might be easier for some.

But several lawmakers remained opposed to a vote, saying they did not want to appear to be bowing to GOP pressure or concede to the argument that without a vote the inquiry is not legitimate.

Rep. Norma Torres (DPomona) said Trump cannot be allowed to dictate the terms of the impeachmen­t process. “He is not in a position to demand anything,” she said. “The only position that he’s in should be to give us all the informatio­n that we’re requesting.”

Pelosi announced three weeks ago that Democrats would begin a formal inquiry, a move that doesn’t require a vote on the House floor, though one was held during the Nixon and Clinton impeachmen­t inquiries.

Democrats have faced pressure from Republican­s to hold the House floor vote, arguing that no lawmaker should escape the political ramificati­ons of such a consequent­ial vote.

Holding a vote would undercut a GOP talking point against the inquiry — that Democrats are conducting a sham, partisan investigat­ion that gives Republican­s little right to participat­e.

White House officials specifical­ly cited the lack of a House vote in their letter declaring that they wouldn’t participat­e in the inquiry. But even with a vote, few expect the White House would then cooperate.

Republican­s may hope that a formal resolution will include language giving them more powers to participat­e in the inquiry, such as subpoenain­g their own witnesses. But it’s unclear what any resolution might say and it’s doubtful that Democrats would cede such power to the minority party.

“There’s no requiremen­t that there be a floor vote,” Pelosi said earlier this month when asked why the House wouldn’t hold the vote. “That’s not anything that is excluded and, by the way, there’s some Republican­s that are very nervous about our bringing that vote to the floor.”

The vote would be politicall­y contentiou­s for a handful of moderates in both parties. But Republican­s may have more at stake. Only eight Democrats have not publicly supported an impeachmen­t inquiry. All of them represent districts that Trump won — and five of them are districts where Trump won substantia­lly, by more than 10 percentage points.

Several other moderate Democrats saw little public backlash for their inquiry support during the recess. In fact, Rep. Max Rose (DN.Y.) was applauded at a town hall meeting this month when he announced his support for an inquiry for the first time.

But while a vote would force moderate Democrats to pick a side, it would force Republican­s to do so as well. GOP lawmakers, who have overwhelmi­ngly stuck with Trump through the House’s impeachmen­t investigat­ion, would have to decide whether the president’s actions warrant an inquiry.

A vote would come as the House’s inquiry is already in process. Four former or current administra­tion officials have testified behind closed doors, and more are expected the rest of the week.

That’s despite the White House refusal to participat­e. Energy Secretary Perry said Tuesday that he would abide by the White House’s noncomplia­nce policy as he faces a deadline of Friday to comply with a subpoena to turn over documents.

Pence and the Office of Management and Budget signaled similar intentions to defy House subpoenas.

 ?? Zach Gibson Getty Images ?? SOME DEMOCRATS told Speaker Nancy Pelosi they didn’t want to lend credence to the idea that the impeachmen­t inquiry isn’t legitimate without a vote.
Zach Gibson Getty Images SOME DEMOCRATS told Speaker Nancy Pelosi they didn’t want to lend credence to the idea that the impeachmen­t inquiry isn’t legitimate without a vote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States