Chile scraps 2 summits to better deal with protests
SANTIAGO, Chile — President Sebastian Piñera said Wednesday that he was canceling two major summits so he could focus on the nearly two weeks of nationwide protests in his country over economic inequality. The protests have left 20 dead and hundreds injured and have damaged businesses and infrastructure in Chile.
The decision is a major blow to Chile’s image as a regional oasis of stability and economic development.
U.S. and Chinese negotiators were hoping to finalize a modest trade agreement in time for President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to sign at the AsiaPacific Economic Cooperation summit in Santiago, which had been set for Nov. 16 and 17. Under the tentative deal, the U.S. had agreed to suspend plans to raise tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese imports, and Beijing
had agreed to step up purchases of American farm products.
Piñera also said Chile wouldn’t host the United Nations global climate gathering planned for Dec. 2-13 because of “the difficult circumstances that the country has seen in recent weeks.”
Chile has seen 13 days of massive protests to demand greater economic equality and better public services in a country long seen as an economic success story. The demonstrations have been accompanied by some vandalism and arson, which spurred the shutdown of numerous subway stations.
“This has been a very difficult decision that causes us great pain,” Piñera said in a televised address.
But, he added, “a president always has to put the needs of his compatriots first.”
U.N. Climate Change Executive Secretary Patricia Espinosa issued a statement saying “alternative hosting options” were being explored. And a U.N. official, speaking on condition of anonymity for lack of authorization to comment publicly, said all U.N. venues were being considered as options. Those would include cities such as New York, Geneva, Vienna and Nairobi, Kenya.
The Santiago conference was meant to work out some of the remaining unresolved rules for countries on climate efforts, smoothing the way for the bigger effort at the 2020 summit: encouraging countries to increase their commitments to cutting climate-changing emissions.
Even if canceling the climate conference means those rules don’t get written this year, “the absence of rules does not stop countries from acting either alone or together” to cut emissions, said Nigel Purvis, a climate and environment negotiator in the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. “It really shouldn’t slow down climate action.”