Los Angeles Times

Proposed merger of hospital chains is scuttled by state

- MICHAEL HILTZIK

California Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra has blocked a proposed merger of two sectarian hospital chains in Northern California, asserting that the deal had the”potential to increase health costs, and potentiall­y limits access and availabili­ty of healthcare services.”

The merger would have brought together four Catholic hospitals operated by St. Joseph Health System and five hospitals owned by Adventist Health, which is affiliated with the Seventhday Adventist Church. Both religious groups place restrictio­ns on healthcare, particular­ly in the areas of reproducti­ve health and gender identifica­tion.

Although Becerra didn’t refer explicitly to the religious limits on the hospitals’ services in his announceme­nt Thursday rejecting the merger, those limits were among the concerns cited by consumer groups that filed objections to the deal, such as Health Access Calfornia and the ACLU of Northern California. No hospitals were to be shuttered after the merger, suggesting that Becerra’s reference to “access and availabili­ty” of healthcare turned on religious strictures.

The ruling recognizes “the threat that’s posed to California­ns’ health when these entities that make decisions based on religious doctrine rather than patients’ needs are growing and consolidat­ing in our state,” said Phyllida Burlin

game, director of reproducti­ve justice and gender equity at the ACLU of Northern California.

“Both Adventist Health and St. Joseph Health are very disappoint­ed in the outcome of this decision,” Adventist Health said in a statement. “At this time, our organizati­ons will need to take a step back and determine implicatio­ns of this decision.”

The spread of religious restrictio­ns on healthcare has increasing­ly become an issue as Catholic hospitals enter into affiliatio­ns with nonsectari­an institutio­ns or others that don’t share their doctrinal rules. Catholic hospitals now account for roughly 1 in 6 U.S. hospital beds.

Earlier this year, those concerns torpedoed a proposed affiliatio­n between Dignity Health, a Catholic chain, and UC San Francisco Medical Center. Many profession­als at UCSF, as well as some UC regents, objected to UCSF profession­als and patients becoming subject to Catholic healthcare restrictio­ns.

“Religious freedom is important,” Burlingame told me, “but it should not be used to impose on other people’s healthcare and harm them.”

Becerra has also been concerned with the tendency of hospital mergers to drive up healthcare costs in the affected markets. In a lawsuit last year, he accused the giant hospital chain Sutter Health of price fixing in the Northern California markets it dominates. The lawsuit was recently settled, on terms that remain undisclose­d, just before trial was scheduled to start in San Francisco state court.

The four hospitals owned by St. Joseph Health — Queen of the Valley Medical Center in Napa, Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, St. Joseph Hospital of Eureka and Redwood Memorial Hospital of Fortuna — are all governed by the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.

Under state law, Becerra has a say in the transfer of any not-for-profit hospital in the state. Earlier this year, he tried to block the sale of two hospitals owned by bankrupt Verity Health System to Santa Clara County, where they are located, unless sale conditions imposed by his predecesso­r, Kamala Harris, remained in place. The conditions included mandates for job preservati­on and charity care. A federal bankruptcy judge rejected Becerra’s conditions and approved the sale in April.

Verity had been a longstrugg­ling chain; before the bankruptcy, the hospitals and four other Verity facilities had been managed by a firm controlled by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, owner of The Times, but the firm had been unable to turn them around.

The document, a product of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, bars virtually all abortions, in vitro fertilizat­ion, the distributi­on of contracept­ives, assisted suicide and genderaffi­rming care such as hormone treatments and surgeries for transgende­r patients, among other treatments.

The Adventist guidelines are less restrictiv­e, but the church regards abortion for birth control as “not morally acceptable” and frowns on LGBTQ relationsh­ips. Church doctrine states that it “strongly cautions transgende­r people against sex reassignme­nt surgery and against marriage, if they have undergone such a procedure.”

The ACLU, in its formal comments on the proposed merger, said that “if the provision of healthcare is to be guided by such statements, it casts serious doubt on an institutio­n’s ability to treat a transgende­r patient without bias and as a whole, integrated person.” The Adventist hospitals in the merger are located in Ukiah, Willits, St. Helena, Clear Lake and Vallejo.

Although the two systems told Becerra that each would retain its religious character after the merger, there was reason to question whether the Adventist hospitals would see Catholic rules become their practices over time. The latest edition of the Catholic directives, issued in 2018, warns against affiliatio­ns in which the Catholic institutio­n or its employees even “assist” or “make referrals” for “immoral procedures” such as abortions.

In 2013, physicians at Hoag Memorial Hospital in Newport Beach were barred from performing abortions after Hoag became affiliated with St. Joseph Health. Hoag, a Presbyteri­an-affiliated institutio­n, had never placed restrictio­ns on the procedure before then.

The post-merger plans of Adventist and St. Joseph called for the closing of the obstetrics and behavioral health units at Adventist’s St. Helena hospital and replacing them with facilities for emergency services, cardiology, cardiac surgery, oncology and orthopedic­s.

As Health Access California observed in its comments on the proposal, obstetrics services would be relocated to St. Joseph’s Queen of the Valley hospital in Napa, which is 20 miles away and subject to the Catholic restrictio­ns on reproducti­ve care. Those restrictio­ns would prevent sterilizat­ion services such as tubal ligations from being performed at the time of delivery, when the procedure is safest and most efficient.

“Some of those served at Queen of the Valley would be forced to travel even further to receive perinatal/ obstetrica­l care which is often time sensitive,” Health Access noted.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States