Los Angeles Times

Here’s why the GOP can’t back Trump’s impeachmen­t

- By Robert Stern

Democrats seem bewildered by Republican­s’ inability to see President Trump as deserving impeachmen­t. But it’s not all that mysterious. Republican­s understand­ably don’t want to commit political suicide, either for themselves or for their party. Nearly all political observers acknowledg­e that a Republican who votes for impeachmen­t would be inviting a primary challenge from a candidate who will defend Trump 100%. The latest polls show 94% of Republican­s support the president and are against impeachmen­t. It is also likely that Trump would campaign for any challenger who takes on a Republican incumbent voting for impeachmen­t.

Moreover, those who break with the party on Trump’s impeachmen­t could have a tougher time in the general election, even if they win in the primary. This is especially true in competitiv­e races, such as those of Susan Collins in Maine or Cory Gardner in Colorado. In districts that trend purple, every vote counts, and if turnout by either party is significan­tly depressed, the other party is likely to triumph.

It’s hard to imagine that Republican­s loyal to Trump will be as motivated to turn out on election day to cast a vote for a Republican senator or House member who voted for impeachmen­t. And Democrats are unlikely to vote Republican in 2020, even to reward a Republican who crossed party lines on impeachmen­t. Democrats are desperate to keep the House and take back the Senate. Of course, independen­ts are the wild card, but they aren’t really all that independen­t, tending to vote consistent­ly for one party or the other when they bother to vote for down-ballot candidates. Republican senators in tough races, like Collins or Gardner, are in trouble no matter what they do, but they can’t afford to alienate their Republican base.

Some Democrats have expressed hope that retiring Republican­s, such as Rep. Will Hurd of Texas or Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, might break with their party to support impeachmen­t. But that, too, is unlikely. They may not be seeking office again, but they do want to keep their options open for future work — including in a Republican presidenti­al administra­tion — and being seen as disloyal to the party wouldn’t be helpful.

Moreover, no politician wants to be remembered as someone who harmed his or her party, and the removal of a sitting Republican president would almost certainly be a blow to the GOP. In the 1974 midterm election, not long after Richard Nixon was forced to resign, Republican­s lost 48 seats in the House and three in the U.S. Senate. This was after many Republican­s in the House and Senate made it clear they no longer could support the president and would cross party lines to oust him.

There are almost certainly Republican­s who secretly believe Trump’s actions are impeachabl­e and wouldn’t mind if he is narrowly defeated next November — as long as Republican­s keep the Senate, so the new Democratic president won’t be able to accomplish much of his or her agenda. After all, they reason, it would mean only one more year of having to put up with this president, and even with a narrow Democratic presidenti­al victory, the party could stay strong and rebuild itself.

Trump may ultimately be judged harshly by history. But for now, it makes political sense for Republican­s to stay quiet and not vote for impeachmen­t or conviction.

Robert Stern is former president of the L.A.-based Center for Government­al Studies, a nonprofit organizati­on that made recommenda­tions on how to improve the government­al process. He now teaches at the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute at UCLA and the Emeritus program at Santa Monica College.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States