Los Angeles Times

The House votes to impeach

Don’t believe the GOP narrative. It was the president who brought us to this unhappy place.

-

It has been clear for some time that President Trump would be impeached. Even so, anyone with a sense of history and a commitment to the U.S. Constituti­on felt a shudder Wednesday when the House of Representa­tives approved two articles of impeachmen­t stemming from the president’s outrageous attempt to induce a foreign country to investigat­e a political rival.

Republican­s in Congress, who have struck a collective profile in cowardice in defending Trump regardless of the evidence, would have you believe that Wednesday’s vote was preordaine­d by Democratic hostility to Trump and resentment over his victory in the 2016 election. Rep. Tom Cole (ROkla.) claimed that “Democrats have been searching for a reason to impeach President Trump since the day he was elected.”

Don’t believe it. The Democrats didn’t bring us to this unhappy moment; Trump did. That he has become only the third president in U.S. history to be impeached is the result of his own abuse of power and contempt for Congress, not a partisan “witch hunt.” It is not an attempted “coup” by Democrats that led to this shameful outcome, but Trump’s own disrespect for laws, rules, institutio­ns and the office he holds.

Yes, some Democrats wanted to impeach the president virtually from the day he took office. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi long resisted the idea, deciding to authorize a formal impeachmen­t inquiry only after a whistleblo­wer complained about Trump’s outrageous efforts to strong-arm Ukraine into investigat­ing former Vice President Joe Biden, a prospectiv­e 2020 Trump opponent. The accusation suggested such a significan­t abuse of office that Pelosi was left with little choice but to move forward.

The hearings that followed produced persuasive testimony that Trump’s notorious July 25 telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was part of a larger campaign to pressure Ukraine to announce investigat­ions favorable to Trump’s reelection. That troubling narrative forms the basis for the first article of impeachmen­t accusing Trump of abuse of power.

The second article of impeachmen­t appropriat­ely accuses Trump of obstructio­n of Congress. When Congress learned of Trump’s improper actions and sought testimony and documents that would provide additional informatio­n, Trump directed administra­tion officials not to cooperate. (Fortunatel­y, several patriotic officials and former officials testified anyway.)

That these articles were approved on essentiall­y a party-line vote doesn’t prove that impeachmen­t is a plot by vengeful Democrats. A better explanatio­n is that Republican­s, fearful of alienating Trump’s base, closed ranks to support the president.

But the process is not over; there is more to be done to decide whether the president deserves to be removed from office. The proceeding­s will now move to the Senate, where Trump is to stand trial for “high crimes and misdemeano­rs.” Ideally, senators would take seriously their oath to “do impartial justice according to the Constituti­on and laws.” In fact, some senators from both parties have already made up their minds.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was frank about it. “I am trying to give a pretty clear signal I have made up my mind,” he said. “I’m not trying to pretend to be a fair juror here.” Graham dismissed the case for impeachmen­t as “partisan nonsense.”

One thing that might shake up the proceeding­s, which at the moment seem on a path to a quick and dismissive acquittal, would be if the Senate were able to obtain testimony that was denied to the House, including that of acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security advisor John Bolton. If Republican­s are so sure Trump did nothing wrong, you’d think they’d push for that testimony.

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reportedly favors a quick trial without witnesses. “It’s not the Senate’s job to leap into the breach and search desperatel­y for ways to get to guilty,” McConnell said (apparently discountin­g the possibilit­y that new witnesses might help Trump’s defense). Concerns about procedures for a Senate trial have led some House Democrats to suggest that Pelosi not transmit the articles of impeachmen­t to the Senate until those concerns are addressed.

The House’s vote to impeach Trump is a historic rebuke, but it is only the first step. If the Constituti­on is to be honored, the Senate must also play its part by treating these allegation­s with the serious considerat­ion they deserve — and listen to the arguments with an open mind.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States