Los Angeles Times

Start-up offers wealthy film fans best seat in own house

- By Kelly Gilblom

Meet Red Carpet Home Cinema, the opposite of Netflix in the fast-changing home-video world.

Unlike the famous streaming service, which serves up thousands of films and TV shows to millions of subscriber­s for about $13 a month, this start-up by two entertainm­ent industry veterans is seeking just 3,000 rich Americans who’ll put up $15,000 and pay $2,500 per movie to watch the latest theatrical releases in their homes.

Since launching in October, Beverly Hills-based Red Carpet has attracted just a sliver of the customers it hopes to sign up in the U.S. in the next two years, founders Fredric Rosen and Dan Fellman say. And they know they aren’t the first to market a high-end, first-run film service to the ultra-rich. But the two say their knowledge of the entertainm­ent industry gives them a fighting chance.

“Everyone is looking for a new, ancillary business,” said Fellman, who spent 37 years at Warner Bros., retiring as president of domestic distributi­on. “So we thought: How do we start a small, ancillary business, but that’s not disruptive?”

He and Rosen, the former president of Ticketmast­er, won’t disclose how their subscriber revenue gets divvied up, but say the studios get the majority. Red Carpet has deals with 10 distributo­rs, including Paramount Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros. and Lions Gate Entertainm­ent Corp. With box office sales slumping and projected to fall again next year, moviemaker­s are happy to have new customers.

The entreprene­urs aren’t alone in targeting super-rich people who don’t want to fight crowds at the theater. Bel Air Cinema has been providing such a service since 2015, mostly outside the U.S.

A few years ago, Imax Corp. invested in a similar project called Prima Cinema, but it never took off. And Sean Parker, the co-founder of Napster and an early Facebook Inc. backer, started Screening Room in 2016. It charged $150 for a settop box to store movies and $50 to see a film at the same time it plays in theaters. The business never gained traction.

Rosen said Screening Room failed to understand the clientele. The ultra-aff luent can afford a perfectly functional $150 leather purse, but wait in line to buy $25,000 Hermes Birkin bags. They want the experience of hosting a dinner party and whisking their friends to their private home cinema after dessert to surprise them with a film that’s otherwise only available in theaters, he said.

“You can buy ‘Two-Buck Chuck’ or an expensive bottle of wine,” Rosen said. “People consume the way they can afford.”

Rosen and Fellman estimate there are 500 to 1,000 households that fit their criteria in New York and Los Angeles, and then an additional 50 to 100 in each of the next 30 largest U.S. cities. Their small team at Red Carpet vets potential customers by assessing their credit and interviewi­ng two references.

The pair say they have almost 100 customers, and they’ve made inroads in places that surprised them, such as West Virginia and North Carolina. The company is backed by Los Angeles-based OCV Management.

Their most popular movie today is “Ford v Ferrari,” starring Christian Bale and Matt Damon. Red Carpet won’t be able to screen the new “Star Wars” movie that opens Dec. 20 because it doesn’t have a deal with Walt Disney Co.

Gilblom writes for Bloomberg.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States