Los Angeles Times

UC regents weigh tuition hike plans

- By Teresa Watanabe

SAN FRANCISCO — University of California regents voiced starkly different views Wednesday on a proposed tuition increase for fall 2020, as consensus on the controvers­ial issue failed to emerge.

During more than two hours of discussion on the first of a two-day meeting in San Francisco, one regent ruled out an increase while others leaned toward one of two plans UC officials have laid out that would raise tuition over five years.

Their debate came one day after Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he opposed any tuition increase as “unwarrante­d, bad for students and inconsiste­nt with our college affordabil­ity goals.” His 2020-21 budget includes a $217.7 million increase in new permanent funding over last year for the UC system.

Regents had pushed back a vote, initially scheduled for Wednesday, to an unspecifie­d later date because they failed to meet a 10-day public notice requiremen­t to post details on any changes to tuition and fees.

Regent Sherry Lansing said that voting for a tuition increase after Newsom had spoken out against one and provided such generous funding for UC seemed like a “slap in the face” and asked regents whether more dialogue with him would be possible.

UC officials say that increasing tuition would help raise more money for financial aid and university needs, as well as provide students, families and campus leaders with predictabl­e changes in revenue and costs. Neediest students would benefit most, since any tuition hike would be more than covered by increased financial aid, which could also be used to use for housing, food and other needs.

One plan — to raise tuition and fees for all students annually by the cost of inflation — would amount to a projected 2.8% increase of $348 over last year, to $12,918 for fall 2020.

The second plan would raise tuition and fees once for each incoming class, called cohorts, but keep those costs flat for six years. Under that plan, the costs for the entering class of 202021 would increase over last year by 4.8%, or $606, to $13,176 for California undergradu­ates. The tuition of existing students would be frozen at their current levels.

But several regents pressed for alternativ­es to a tuition increase: lobby Sacramento for more state funding; increase philanthro­py and control UC spending. One chart presented to regents showed UC costs growing by more than $2 billion by 2024, which took some of them aback.

Board Chairman John A. Pérez and Regent Lark Park noted the myriad campus needs including class overcrowdi­ng, staff and labor working conditions, enormous pension liabilitie­s, required seismic retrofitti­ng, student hunger and homelessne­ss. Pérez reminded regents that they approved many of the UC initiative­s and programs, including recent collective bargaining agreements that will raise wages.

“We can’t pretend these rational good decisions we’ve made pay for themselves,” he said. “They don’t.”

Students spoke out strongly against any increase. Several asked regents to consider the negative impact on those who would not benefit from more financial aid. They include students saddled with high medical expenses, LGBTQ students whose parents refuse to chip in for college, students who don’t know how to apply for financial aid and out-of-state students.

“We as an organizati­on do not support making college more affordable for some students by making it more expensive for others,” said Varsha Sarveshwar, UC Student Assn. president.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States