Los Angeles Times

Mistrial sought in Durst murder case

Defense team argues that delays caused by the coronaviru­s will lead to an unfair trial.

- BY JAMES QUEALLY AND MATT HAMILTON

Robert Durst’s defense team has asked for a mistrial in the real estate scion’s Los Angeles murder case, arguing that delays in court proceeding­s caused by the coronaviru­s will make it impossible for him to receive a fair trial.

Durst was standing trial in the 2000 murder of his longtime confidant Susan Berman when the pandemic paralyzed most of the nation. Prosecutor­s say Durst killed Berman to prevent her from spilling incriminat­ing informatio­n about the 1982 disappeara­nce of his first wife, Kathleen, whose body was never found.

Durst, 77, was charged with Berman’s murder in 2015, around the same time an HBO documentar­y reignited national interest in the case. He has pleaded not guilty.

Trial testimony was suspended March 12 because of the virus.

“Even in the best case scenario, assuming it will be safe to resume trial in early June, more than eighty days will have elapsed before the jury reconvenes,” the 29page motion said.

Durst’s defense team argued that the gap in time would make it “unrealisti­c” to believe jurors could retain important details from earlier testimony or avoid outside influences.

“The risk that jurors will not be accurately able to recall the evidence introduced prior to adjournmen­t is heightened here. The trial is expected to be a long and complex one, lasting approximat­ely four to five months,” the motion said. “The People’s witness list contains approximat­ely 115 names.”

Durst’s attorneys also expressed concerns about health risks if the trial were to proceed: Five jurors are older than 65, and two members of the defense team are over 75, according to the motion. Durst also has a history of medical problems.

“At this time, forcing a relatively large group of trial participan­ts, including several high-risk individual­s, to congregate in facilities ‘illequippe­d’ for social distancing would create an unjustifie­d risk of serious illness,” the motion said.

A spokesman for the L.A. County district attorney’s office declined to comment.

The coronaviru­s outbreak has frozen most court proceeding­s statewide. On Wednesday, California’s chief justice, Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, extended a previous emergency order delaying trials up to 90 days.

The next hearing in Durst’s case is scheduled for June 23.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States