Los Angeles Times

Censorship by antiracist­s

-

Re “Hey, HBO, ‘GWTW’ has to go,” Opinion, June 10

I am shocked that John Ridley demanded the eliminatio­n of “Gone With the Wind” from the HBO Max streaming service, and that HBO caved.

Yes, “Gone With the Wind” portrays slavery in a benign light, and it could not be remade today without a major rewrite to dramatize the horrors of slavery and include multidimen­sional Black characters. It is also a major landmark in film history.

Censorship is wrong, even if it’s done by antiracist­s demanding to suppress a film that, for all its glorificat­ion of the “lost cause,” also presents a heroine who grows from a shallow schemer into a woman of strength and power. Besides, removing “Gone With the Wind” prevents viewers from seeing the first performanc­e by a Black actor to win an Academy Award. Mark Gabrish Conlan

San Diego

Thank you for publishing Ridley’s timely essay about the 1939 film “Gone With the Wind.” Many of my elders considered this film nonfiction, depicting the “truth” about the Civil War.

Rebel soldiers like Ashley Wilkes were dashing, romantic heroes to them. They truly believed that the so-called cause the Confederac­y fought for was righteous and sacred.

Bravo to HBO for its decision to pull it from their lineup. I agree with Ridley: The film should be shown, but with panel discussion­s and interviews to help viewers understand the harm this propaganda causes. Marcia Harlan

Idyllwild

I appreciate­d Ridley’s piece urging HBO not to show “Gone With the Wind.”

In 2001, a parody novel was published entitled “The Wind Done Gone,” a retelling of the story of “Gone With the Wind” from the standpoint of one of the slaves. I wonder if there has been any considerat­ion of making a movie based on that novel. John T. Donovan

Hacienda Heights

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States