Los Angeles Times

Emergency order end in sight?

The White House has discussed rolling back declaratio­ns — even as COVID cases surge.

- By Noam N. Levey

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion, eager to claim victory over the coronaviru­s, has been considerin­g scaling back the national emergency declared earlier this year to control the pandemic, according to healthcare industry officials who have spoken with the administra­tion.

The prospect has stoked alarm among public health leaders, physicians, hospital officials and others who are trying to control the outbreak and fear that such a move would make it more difficult for state and local government­s and health systems to keep the spread of the coronaviru­s in check.

When pressed on the issue Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany told The Times that no such move was imminent.

“I just spoke with the president,” she said, “and he said we are not looking at lifting the national emergency declaratio­ns.”

But officials in this White

House have a history of contradict­ing themselves, most recently on Monday when McEnany claimed President Trump was joking over the weekend when he said he’d directed aides to slow coronaviru­s testing. Trump said Tuesday it wasn’t a joke.

Several industry officials

interviewe­d by The Times said they’d received indication­s over the last week from the Trump administra­tion that lifting emergency declaratio­ns was being considered.

“It was very much under discussion,” said one industry official, who asked not to be identified to avoid jeopardizi­ng relations with the administra­tion.

The discussion­s have taken place as hospitaliz­ations and caseloads have begun to climb rapidly in several large states that moved early to lift restrictio­ns on businesses, an increase that could make it more difficult for the administra­tion to end the emergency declaratio­ns.

Healthcare leaders said they’d been mystified by the administra­tion’s unwillingn­ess to publicly commit to an extension of the emergency declaratio­ns, one of which is scheduled to expire next month.

“It’s the silence that worries us,” said Meg Murray, chief executive of the Assn. for Community Affiliated Plans, which represents nonprofit health insurers, many of whose customers are low-income. “If they were seeing the world the way we are, we’d expect them to be more clear.”

“I know the administra­tion is trying to pretend that this is over, but it’s clearly not,” said Dr. Georges Benjamin, longtime head of the American Public Health Assn. “Many governors are still struggling to figure out what they need to do, particular­ly in those states where they are beginning to realize they have emergencie­s.… We need the flexibilit­y that emergency declaratio­ns provide.”

The emergency declaratio­ns the administra­tion has issued since the beginning of the year have loosened or waived rules and regulation­s on hospitals and other medical providers and helped route badly needed money to states.

A dramatic expansion of telehealth, for example, has been smoothed by an emergency declaratio­n allowing Medicare and commercial health plans to reimburse clinics and hospitals for telephone and internet visits. That’s made it possible for patients to see their doctors without going to an office.

Similarly, hospitals have been able to quickly hire more staff, sometimes from other states, and to add beds without going through a lengthy permitting process.

Emergency declaratio­ns also have freed additional Medicaid money for states and made it easier to ensure that people who rely on Medicaid won’t lose coverage during the economic downturn.

California received a waiver from the federal government to allow patients on its Medicaid program to more quickly receive mental health and substance abuse treatment via telehealth.

“People may be unaware of how important these declaratio­ns are to the ability of the healthcare system to address coronaviru­s,” said Carmela Coyle, president of the California Hospital Assn., many of whose members have been scrambling to keep California’s outbreak in check.

California is among more than two dozen states where the number of coronaviru­s cases is rising, according to data assembled by the Coronaviru­s Resource Center at Johns Hopkins University.

Increases in some states may largely reflect more testing, which health officials say they believe is the case in California. Many states, including Texas and Florida, are also recording a sharp increase in hospitaliz­ations, indicating that serious cases are on the rise.

Now, public health experts fear that deaths may soon begin to rise again after a months-long decline. COVID-19, the disease caused by the virus, has killed more than 121,000 Americans.

Despite the worrying numbers, Trump has been downplayin­g the threat for weeks as the cost of the economic slowdown has become increasing­ly acute.

The president dramatical­ly scaled back the work schedule of the White House coronaviru­s task force and ended daily briefings by the group, including its leading scientists. He has urged a swift return to normal, celebratin­g moves by states to relax restrictio­ns.

Trump also continues to argue that the increasing number of cases is being driven entirely by more testing, an idea widely dismissed by public health experts.

Declaring an end to the national emergency may bolster the president’s claim that the country is returning to normal.

One of the declaratio­ns — a public health emergency issued by the Department of Health and Human Services in January and renewed in April — is set to expire in late July unless the agency renews it.

A spokespers­on for the health agency wouldn’t discuss the declaratio­n on the record but in a statement said: “At this time, HHS expects to renew the Public Health Emergency due to

COVID-19 before it expires. We have already renewed this PHE once.”

Hospital, health plan and public health officials say that renewal is important. But they caution that it is equally important to ensure the president does not end related national emergency declaratio­ns that he made in March.

These additional declaratio­ns — one called a national emergency declaratio­n and one called a Stafford Act declaratio­n — are also critical to sustaining the healthcare system response, they say.

“The key waivers and increased access to many critical supplies depend on these declaratio­ns being in force,” said Chip Kahn, head of the Federation of American Hospitals. “It’s unfathomab­le to me that they would drop any of them.”

Trump was reluctant to issue the additional national emergency declaratio­ns in March, as he worked at the time to downplay the severity of the outbreak.

The delay prevented states from fully leveraging their Medicaid programs, stoking rising cries from state leaders for White House action.

 ?? Nelvin C. Cepeda San Diego Union-Tribune ?? A COVID-19 PATIENT is wheeled to the ICU at the Jacobs Medical Center at UC San Diego Health in La Jolla. Healthcare leaders say they’re mystified by the Trump administra­tion’s unwillingn­ess to commit to extending emergency orders that start expiring next month.
Nelvin C. Cepeda San Diego Union-Tribune A COVID-19 PATIENT is wheeled to the ICU at the Jacobs Medical Center at UC San Diego Health in La Jolla. Healthcare leaders say they’re mystified by the Trump administra­tion’s unwillingn­ess to commit to extending emergency orders that start expiring next month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States