Los Angeles Times

Intel shares plunge on outsourcin­g talk

-

Intel Corp. Chief Executive Bob Swan spent almost an hour Thursday discussing an idea that would once have been unthinkabl­e for the world’s largest semiconduc­tor company: not manufactur­ing its own chips. Intel’s shares tumbled as much as 18% on Friday morning.

Outsourcin­g is the norm in the $400-billion industry nowadays, but for 50 years Intel has combined chip design with in-house production. And until recently, Intel was even planning to churn out processors for others.

“To the extent that we need to use somebody else’s process technology, and we call those contingenc­y plans, we will be prepared to do that,” Swan told analysts on a conference call, after the company warned of another delayed production process. “That gives us much more optionalit­y and flexibilit­y. So in the event there is a process slip, we can try something rather than make it all ourselves.”

Pursuing this option would represent a huge shift in the industry and the end of Intel’s biggest differenti­ator, Cowen & Co. analyst Matt Ramsay said.

Design can do only so much for semiconduc­tor performanc­e. The manufactur­ing step is crucial to ensuring these components can store more data, process informatio­n faster and use less energy. Combining the two helped Intel improve both sides of its operation for decades.

However, Taiwan Semiconduc­tor Manufactur­ing Co. has succeeded by focusing on production and leaving the design to other companies. Its factories have passed Intel in capabiliti­es. And that’s helped Intel rivals such as Advanced Micro Devices Inc. catch up on performanc­e. AMD shares rose 16.5% on Friday.

Intel’s current best technology, known as 10 nanometer in the industry, was scheduled to appear in 2017 and is only now making it into high-volume production. And when the company reported results on Thursday, it said the next iteration — 7 nanometer — would be delayed by a year.

“You didn’t need to read any more,” Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said. “Whatever little credibilit­y they had is out of the window.”

That sent Intel shares tumbling and left Swan fending off questions from analysts. They all asked about the manufactur­ing delay, its consequenc­es and what Intel plans to do. The shares fell the most in four months Friday to an intraday low of $49.50. They ended at $50.59, down 16.2%.

Swan’s answers were sometimes disjointed and vague.

“What’s different is we’re going to be pretty pragmatic about — yes if, and if and when we should be making a step inside or making it outside and making sure that we have optionalit­y to — yeah build internally mix and match inside and outside or go outside in its entirety,” he said at one point.

Intel’s backup plan means it may tap Taiwan Semiconduc­tor to make its chips. But that won’t be easy, Ramsay said. TSMC’s other customers, which compete with Intel, would probably oppose the Taiwanese company prioritizi­ng Intel’s designs, he said.

Swan tried to put a positive spin on the challenge when he wrapped up the conference call.

The flexibilit­y is “not a sign of weakness,” he said.

— Stacy Rasgon, ‘Whatever little credibilit­y they had is out of the window.’ Sanford C. Bernstein analyst

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States