Los Angeles Times

COVID-19 law is tightened

Essential employees’ burden of proof gets relaxed over workers’ comp

- By Melody Gutierrez Times staff writer John Myers contribute­d to this report.

— California will relax the burden of proof to receive workers’ compensati­on benefits for some employees who contract COVID-19 on the job under a bill Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Thursday.

Senate Bill 1159 by Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) makes it easier for police, firefighte­rs and other essential employees who contract COVID-19 while working to be covered under the state’s workers’ compensati­on program.

In other workplaces — both public and private — the new law presumes employees caught the novel coronaviru­s on the job if there is an outbreak at their worksite, ensuring those employees are eligible to have their medical bills and lost wages covered.

Because lawmakers passed the law as an urgency bill, it will go into effect immediatel­y, bypassing the typical Jan. 1 start date for most laws.

Newsom said during a bill-signing ceremony streamed online that the new law makes clear the need to “prioritize our workforce, our workers, our frontline essential workforce that we pay a lot of lip service to but, often, we don’t back up.”

Newsom’s signature Thursday didn’t come as a surprise. The governor said earlier this year that he planned to work “hand in glove” with the Legislatur­e to expand COVID-19 workplace protection­s, including loosening workers’ compensati­on claim requiremen­ts.

Newsom signed an executive order in May easing workers’ comp restrictio­ns for all employees required to work outside the home, but those changes expired July 5. SB 1159 is retroactiv­e to July 6 and expires in 2023.

“This helps employees who are struggling after becoming a victim of COVID-19,” Hill said.

California’s workers’ compensati­on system pays employees who have suffered an injury or illness on the job, regardless of who is at fault. For most workers, the onus is on them to prove the injury or illness was work-related.

However, certain occupation­al injuries and maladies experience­d by law enforcemen­t officers, firefighte­rs and correction­al officers, such as heart disease, hernias, pneumonia, cancer and meningitis, are presumed to have occurred during the course of their employment, requiring the workers’ compensati­on system to pay for treatment and, in fatal cases, death benefits.

The state’s 100-year-old workers’ compensati­on insurance system relies on nearly 700,000 businesses covered by 200 insurance companies to pay for medical care and wage replacemen­t when employees are injured while working. Some 800,000 workers receive benSACRAME­NTO efits from the program each year, according to a 2020 report from the Workers’ Compensati­on Insurance Rating Bureau of California.

There have been more than 40,436 claims filed so far this year by workers who said they contracted COVID-19 on the job, according to statistics from the Department of Industrial Relations, which oversees the workers’ compensati­on system. Of those, 11,186 have been rejected, with most denials attributed to a negative COVID-19 test.

The number of workers’ compensati­on claims for the coronaviru­s jumped from 4,790 in May to 11,271 in June and to 12,889 in July, according to the Department of Industrial Relations.

The workers’ comp rating bureau estimated that COVID-19 claims will cost employers and insurers around $2 billion. The bureau estimated in May that the average claim paid would be $29,000.

Under the law Newsom signed, employees will be presumed to have contracted COVID-19 on the job if there was an outbreak where they worked.

The law defines an outbreak as when five or more employees contract the virus within a 14-day period at a workplace with five to 100 employees or when 5% of employees contract the virus in that period at a worksite with more than 100 employees.

In those cases, an employer could still challenge a claim on the grounds that the employee had been exposed elsewhere, but opponents of the bill argued that is a difficult burden to prove.

“I think the threshold is critical,” Hill said. “Really, it’s common sense. You shouldn’t be able to have an outbreak of the extent we’ve seen in some workplaces and conclude those workers didn’t get it from the workplace.”

During the final weeks of the legislativ­e session that concluded Aug. 31, the bill underwent six amendments in an attempt to reach consensus among labor and business groups.

Under the new law, the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensati­on will be required to conduct a study on the effect of COVID-19 on the workers’ compensati­on system by April 30, 2022.

Newsom also signed Assembly Bill 685 by Assemblywo­man Eloise Gomez Reyes (D-Grand Terrace), which will require employers to provide written notice to workers who may have been exposed to the virus and to inform local public health officials.

The legislatio­n also gives state regulators new authority over the next two years to penalize business owners if workplace violations are discovered.

 ?? Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times ?? GROCERY WORKERS associated with UFCW Local 770 demonstrat­e outside a Food 4 Less supermarke­t last month in Los Angeles, where dozens of employees allegedly contracted the novel coronaviru­s.
Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times GROCERY WORKERS associated with UFCW Local 770 demonstrat­e outside a Food 4 Less supermarke­t last month in Los Angeles, where dozens of employees allegedly contracted the novel coronaviru­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States