Los Angeles Times

Officials might take it to a vote

Pac-12 administra­tors meet today to discuss football season, but questions remain.

- By Ben Bolch Times staff writers Ryan Kartje and J. Brady McCollough contribute­d to this report.

Just a few days ago, it seemed as if the meeting of Pac-12 presidents and chancellor­s scheduled for Friday would amount to little more than another opportunit­y to commiserat­e about a lost fall sports season.

Now there’s a chance they could have something to celebrate.

Recent developmen­ts including the acquisitio­n of rapid daily testing for COVID-19 and the approval of full-contact football practices could clear the way for conference leaders to vote on potential season start dates or at least agree in principle to resume sports that had been previously pushed back to 2021.

To be sure, any decisions won’t be as easy as yea or nay.

The rapid testing isn’t scheduled to be in place on campuses before the end of this month, potentiall­y delaying the start of practices until then.

There remain concerns about viral transmissi­on leading to an increased risk of myocarditi­s, an inf lammation of the heart. And even with USC and UCLA gaining assurances Wednesday night from public health officials who said they wouldn’t stand in the way of football practices, Stanford and California face more stringent local restrictio­ns.

Hazardous air quality could be another obstacle given the raging wildfires in Oregon and California that have forced some teams to curtail workouts over the last week and show no sign of abating.

There’s also the matter of how much time is needed once practices start. Some teams have been lifting inside their weight rooms for months while others have had to conduct modified outdoor workouts, leading to varying degrees of readiness. One USC assistant coach said Thursday that the Trojans would need six weeks before being ready to play.

A season that started on Halloween, considered by some as a wildly optimistic scenario, could include as many as seven games before a conference championsh­ip on Dec. 19.

Any bye week added to the schedule would reduce the number of games and the likelihood of the conference champion taking part in the College Football Playoff, which will have its participan­ts revealed on Dec. 20.

CFP executive director Bill Hancock said in an email that there have been no conversati­ons about changing either the bracket release date or dates for the national semifinals or national chamat pionship but that the organizati­on would follow whatever protocol is establishe­d by the management committee.

The Big Ten Conference ensured its potential inclusion in the CFP on Wednesday by announcing an eightgame schedule that’s slated to start the weekend of Oct. 24.

That announceme­nt spurred a flurry of activity, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom lifting the state health restrictio­ns that had barred four Pac-12 teams from staging traditiona­l 11on-11 practices while deferring to local health authoritie­s on safety protocols.

The need to seek clarity on those local guidelines sparked a collaborat­ion between USC athletic director Mike Bohn and an unusual ally in Martin Jarmond, his UCLA counterpar­t.

The athletic directors simultaneo­usly spoke with Los Angeles County health officials who said they would not prevent their respective teams from holding full football practices.

Bohn and Jarmond declined to comment Thursday, but the L.A. County Department of Public Health released a statement saying that college sports could proceed if they satisfied state and NCAA requiremen­ts.

One person close to the UCLA football team said he expected players could lift weights indoors by Monday the latest after having previously been forced to conduct all workouts outdoors.

Conference officials must also consider the concerns of the #WeAreUnite­d movement that arose before the season was postponed.

One player involved with the movement who spoke on condition of anonymity said safety issues persisted amid a possible hurried start to the season and that the Pac-12 shouldn’t mindlessly follow the Big Ten.

“We are simply not in the same situation,” the player said. “The sentiment that players don’t have a real voice in decisions that have so much stake in their lives has been brutally exemplifie­d with this pandemic.”

Football isn’t the only topic that the Pac-12 presidents and chancellor­s are expected to discuss Friday. They’ll also consider an accelerate­d start date for their men’s and women’s basketball teams, whose seasons initially had been pushed back to at least Jan. 1 when the conference announced it was postponing fall sports. That timeline could be moved up considerab­ly after the NCAA on Thursday announced the basketball season could start on Nov. 25 and recommende­d that teams play at least four nonconfere­nce games.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States