Los Angeles Times

In time of crisis, protect domestic workers

State workplace safety law excludes them. As fires and a pandemic rage, it’s long past time to right this wrong.

- FRANK SHYONG

Sandra Martinez, 45, a housekeepe­r, used to work three days a week before the pandemic struck. Now she does the same work for one day’s pay, because her employer thought one housekeepi­ng appointmen­t was less risky than three.

She used to take three buses to work, an epic commute that made her workdays 15 hours long. Now she pays out of pocket for Uber, exhausting her savings, because her family heard that taking the bus was unsafe.

As we all try to take fewer risks, housekeepe­rs, caregivers and child-care providers like Martinez have paid the price. Nearly threequart­ers of domestic work- ers reported losing their

jobs in an April survey. Many domestic workers who can afford only to take the bus to their jobs have lost them. A disproport­ionate number of domestic workers and their family members have contracted COVID-19 and died.

In California, an estimated 350,000 domestic workers employed by more than 2 million families have no workplace safety protection­s during a time when their work couldn’t be more dangerous or essential.

Gov. Gavin Newsom is considerin­g a bill that might finally change that. Senate Bill 1257, which passed with little opposition in the Assembly and Senate, would end the exclusion of domestic workers from California Division of Occupation­al Safety and Health protection­s. Newsom has until Sept. 30 to sign it into law.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Maria Elena Durazo (D-Los Angeles), said that ending the exclusion of domestic workers from workplace safety protection­s is also about showing voters that political leaders plan to keep their promises about confrontin­g modern-day legacies of racism.

“We can’t just give lip service to institutio­nal racism and veto this. How does that make sense? This is about destroying one of the final legacies of slavery and racism. It’s the right thing to do,” Durazo said.

The exclusion of domestic workers from labor protection­s has its origins in Reconstruc­tion-era politics. Southerner­s wanted to continue reaping the economic benefits of slavery after its abolition. Freed male slaves were pressed into sharecropp­ing, and many freed female slaves could find work only in the homes of their former masters.

When Congress gave employees the right to form unions in 1935, domestic workers and farm laborers — largely freed slaves or their descendant­s — were excluded by legislator­s to curry favor with Southern Democrats. When labor standards for workweeks and workdays were establishe­d three years later, domestic workers and farm laborers were again excluded for the same reason.

Domestic work, done by women for centuries with no pay, has been systematic­ally devalued in order to preserve a system that benefited domestic employers. But it is one of the most dangerous and injurious types of work, full of the repetitive, strenuous motions that commonly lead to injury.

Emily Uy, a 61-year-old, 5-foot-1 Filipina woman, felt something crack in her back a few years ago while attempting to lift a patient who was losing control of her muscles.

Her employer, who had refused her requests to hire an assistant, also refused to help with her $7,000 medical bill, she said. She didn’t want to ask her client, who was living on a fixed income. So she found a loan and paid it off in 24 installmen­ts over two years.

“We really need protection when we get hurt. If we get sick or hurt, we don’t get paid,” Uy said.

A new survey conducted by the City University of New York found that domestic workers reported rates of back injury comparable to those of constructi­on workers.

A third of respondent­s also said they lacked adequate personal protective equipment, and just 1 in 4 had received any safety training for pandemic conditions. More than 67% feared retaliatio­n if they refused to perform an unsafe task, according to the study.

Pandemic conditions have also led to an explosion in the popularity of Clorox cleaning products, thanks to their prominent placement on the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s lists of recommende­d disinfecta­nts to protect against COVID-19.

Families are insisting on using bleach products because of virus fears, said Maegan Ortiz, executive director of Instituto de Educación Popular del Sur de California, a Southern California group that helps organize domestic workers. Clorox revenues are up more than 20% on the year, and the company saw its highest stock price ever.

For Carmen Jimenez, 53, the bleach has meant headaches, inflamed allergies and trouble breathing. She was laid up in bed for three days with flu-like symptoms, but her employer still insisted on Clorox products.

“I’m just tired. I realize they don’t respect us and our health,” Jimenez said.

The domestic workforce in California is almost entirely composed of women and immigrants who earn minimum wage or less. There has never been a good reason for excluding them from workplace safety protection­s, and there’s never been a more dangerous time to work in California.

Record wildfires rage across the state, and domestic workers will be asked to clean up the aftermath. An airborne virus stalks every indoor space, and without safety protocols and PPE, they cannot protect themselves or their families.

Domestic workers facing these dangers, with the help of groups such as the California Domestic Workers Coalition, are awakening to the injustice of their conditions. A group of about 50 domestic workers gathered Thursday in MacArthur Park around an altar to fallen domestic workers decorated with Clorox products, mops and cleaning buckets.

Rosalinda, a domestic worker who was not given permission to attend the protest by the Beverly Hills family she works for, spoke via a recorded message.

“Look at my eyes, so red from working. Sometimes I cannot sleep because I am too tired. We need protection. You can work from home, but we have to do our work in other people’s homes.”

After the speeches concluded and the altar was cleaned up, most of us went home. But on the walk to my car, I ran into some of the domestic workers from the rally at the bus stop.

It was 9 o’clock on Thursday morning, and they had to go to work.

 ?? Al Seib Los Angeles Times ?? DIANA MENDOZA embraces her daughter Naima Wilson, 8, at a MacArthur Park rally Thursday in support of a bill on the governor’s desk that would end the exclusion of domestic workers from Cal/OSHA protection­s.
Al Seib Los Angeles Times DIANA MENDOZA embraces her daughter Naima Wilson, 8, at a MacArthur Park rally Thursday in support of a bill on the governor’s desk that would end the exclusion of domestic workers from Cal/OSHA protection­s.
 ??  ??
 ?? Photograph­s by Al Seib Los Angeles Times ?? COMMUNITY ORGANIZER Edna Sandoval, center, joins domestic workers protesting at MacArthur Park in support of Senate Bill 1257, which would extend state workplace safety protection­s to household laborers.
Photograph­s by Al Seib Los Angeles Times COMMUNITY ORGANIZER Edna Sandoval, center, joins domestic workers protesting at MacArthur Park in support of Senate Bill 1257, which would extend state workplace safety protection­s to household laborers.
 ??  ?? MAEGAN ORTIZ directs the Instituto de Educación Popular del Sur de California, the rally’s organizer.
MAEGAN ORTIZ directs the Instituto de Educación Popular del Sur de California, the rally’s organizer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States