Los Angeles Times

A call for democracy reforms

Donald Trump has abused the office like no president before him. We need to institute the first major democracy reforms since Watergate.

- By Adam B. Schiff Adam B. Schiff is chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligen­ce and represents California’s 28th Congressio­nal District.

Having wrested hard-won independen­ce from a monarch, the founders of our nation sought to form a new union where executive power was constraine­d by other branches of government. They did so knowing that men are not angels, and believing that through a system of checks and balances that set “ambition against ambition,” a fledgling democracy could survive, even thrive.

That beautiful construct has been put to the test by a president who neither understand­s nor respects our constituti­onal scheme or the value of democratic governance.

When Donald Trump was inaugurate­d in 2017, I was confident that our Constituti­on and democratic institutio­ns, which had survived the Civil War, terrorist attacks, economic crises and more, could withstand an unscrupulo­us president. What I did not foresee was the awful degree to which the party of the president would surrender its institutio­nal responsibi­lities in order to protect its hold on power — and the extent to which this abdication would leave such a president unconstrai­ned.

As we survey the wreckage of the past 3½ years, it’s apparent that the foundation of our democracy has been shaken. Trump has sought to turn the instrument­s of government to his personal and political advantage, and to an astonishin­g degree, he has been successful.

He has extorted a foreign partner for dirt on his political opponent, a scheme for which he was impeached. He has interfered in prosecutio­ns of his closest friends and allies, and abused the pardon and commutatio­n powers to help political friends. He has painted the press as the “enemy of the people,” violated the Hatch Act, usurped Congress’ power of the purse to build a wall Congress did not fund, and retaliated against whistleblo­wers and inspectors general who exposed his wrongdoing and that of others.

Instead of being constraine­d by norms, Trump has acted as a stress test for our system of checks and balances, probing for where his powers are greatest and accountabi­lity is weakest.

Trump is not the first president to seek to accumulate power and punish his enemies. When the crimes of Richard Nixon came to light after Watergate, Congress went to work to prevent such abuses from happening again. In what became known as the post-Watergate reforms, Congress created new checks and balances, including campaign finance reform, disclosure and transparen­cy requiremen­ts for public servants, and privacy protection­s. Congress also establishe­d new oversight mechanisms, including the intelligen­ce committees.

At every turn, we have fought Trump’s abuses in the House, in the courts, and in an impeachmen­t trial in the U.S. Senate. And today, we are taking the next step by introducin­g the first major democracy reform package since Watergate, the Protecting Our Democracy Act. Dozens of members and committees have contribute­d to this package and its proposals.

These reforms are just the beginning, not the end, of our work to protect and strengthen the guardrails of our democracy, against Trump and future presidents from either party who seek to abuse their power. Our reforms are built on three pillars and they are built to last.

First, we must prevent abuses of presidenti­al power. The president is granted immense authority under the Constituti­on, but it’s not without limit or accountabi­lity. Our reforms would prevent the abuse of the pardon power, as Trump has done when he gave or dangled pardons to his cronies, and make clear that corrupt pardons can be prosecuted as bribery. It would also create a mechanism to enforce the constituti­onal prohibitio­n on emoluments, which Trump has blatantly disregarde­d to enrich himself and his family.

Second, we must restore our system of checks and balances, the bedrock of our constituti­onal system, and ensure accountabi­lity and transparen­cy. Our reforms would address a president’s efforts to run out the clock on oversight by providing for expedited enforcemen­t of congressio­nal subpoenas and fines for officials who refuse to cooperate. It would reassert the power of the purse, Congress’ authority over spending, and prevent the abuse of presidenti­al emergency powers.

Finally, we need to protect our elections from foreign interferen­ce, because Americans must decide American elections. Our reforms would require political campaigns to report to the FBI suspicious foreign contacts or offers of assistance, and clarify that dirt on an opponent is a “thing of value” that campaigns are prohibited from soliciting or receiving from foreign powers.

These reforms may not be signed into law under this president, but I am confident that they will become law under a future administra­tion, and will soon become enshrined into our understand­ing of American democracy, just as the postWaterg­ate reforms did.

Earlier this year, as the House debated impeachmen­t, Speaker Nancy Pelosi quoted Benjamin Franklin. Asked upon exiting the Constituti­onal Convention what form of government the fledgling United States would have, Franklin said, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Trump has posed exactly the kind of existentia­l threat to our democracy that our founders feared.

But we are not powerless to protect our country going forward. With these reforms, we can keep our republic. Our Constituti­on and our democracy are our sacred heritage. We will not allow them to be degraded or destroyed, by Donald Trump or anyone else.

 ?? Shawn Thew European Pressphoto Agency ?? PRESIDENT TRUMP, appearing before Congress in 2017, has sought to turn the instrument­s of government to his personal and political advantage — and he has been astonishin­gly successful at it.
Shawn Thew European Pressphoto Agency PRESIDENT TRUMP, appearing before Congress in 2017, has sought to turn the instrument­s of government to his personal and political advantage — and he has been astonishin­gly successful at it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States