Los Angeles Times

A close look at Trump’s healthcare order

- By Noam N. Levey

WASHINGTON — Less than six weeks before election day, President Trump traveled to North Carolina on Thursday to announce his commitment to protecting Americans with pre- existing medical conditions and to issue another round of executive orders related to healthcare.

“We are delivering better care, with more choice, at a much lower cost and working to ensure Americans have access to the care they need,” Trump told supporters in Charlotte, saying his plan “always protects patients with pre- existing conditions.”

But it remains unclear what kind of protection­s Americans may receive. Here’s a rundown of what the president’s words really mean for Americans with pre- existing medical conditions.

Why are pre- existing conditions such a big deal?

Before the advent of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, health insurers would routinely refuse coverage to people who had pre- existing medical conditions, such as diabetes, cancer or allergies.

Even pregnancy could be deemed a pre- existing condition that an insurer could refuse to cover.

The healthcare law, often called Obamacare, barred insurers from this kind of discrimina­tion, protecting the millions of Americans who live with medical conditions.

According to one estimate by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation, about a quarter of nonelderly adults have a health condition that an insurer could decline to cover, if that were still allowed.

And nearly half of non

elderly families in the U. S. have at least one member with a health condition that could provide the basis for denying coverage, according to the foundation.

If Americans are already protected by Obamacare, why is Trump announcing an executive order on preexistin­g conditions?

Trump has been calling for repeal of the health law for years and has been under growing pressure to lay out an alternativ­e.

He never produced an alternativ­e in 2017, when Republican­s in Congress tried to roll back the law. And despite multiple promises since, he still hasn’t laid out a plan to replace the law

and its many consumer protection­s, including the ban on denying coverage to people with pre- existing conditions.

Currently, the administra­tion, joining Texas and other conservati­ve states, is asking the Supreme Court to wipe out the whole law. The justices are scheduled to hear arguments in that case shortly after the election.

With the recent death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who has defended the health law in the past, the outcome of the case is much less clear.

Former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic presidenti­al nominee, has been intensifyi­ng criticism

of Trump for trying to repeal the law and its consumer protection­s.

Could the executive order actually replace the healthcare law?

In a word, no. While a president can use an executive order to direct federal agencies to do certain things, he or she can’t change the law or place new legal requiremen­ts on how health insurers act in a commercial market.

That means Trump cannot simply tell insurers they must offer coverage to someone with a pre- existing medical condition.

If the Supreme Court strikes down the 2010 law, Congress would need pass a

new law to bar insurers from denying coverage to people with pre- existing conditions, a fact acknowledg­ed on Thursday by Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar.

What’s so hard about that?

One of the reasons why the health law was so difficult to pass a decade ago is that health insurance is very complicate­d. Making coverage available to more people takes more than simply directing health insurers to cover people with pre- existing medical conditions.

The most important issue is that requiring insurers to cover people with pre- existing conditions makes health insurance much more expensive.

The healthcare law deals with that problem in two ways: It bars insurers from charging people with preexistin­g medical conditions more than people who don’t have such conditions. That spreads the extra cost among more people.

And, very importantl­y, the law provides subsidies to low- and moderate- income Americans to help them buy health plans. These subsidies are critical because they make insurance more affordable, at least for those whose incomes make them eligible for the government help.

Those who earn too much for the subsidies face higher premiums — caused largely by the pre- existing condition requiremen­t. Those higher costs have helped drive much of the criticism of the law.

Does Trump’s order do anything about those issues?

No. The president’s order does not address the cost of insurance or the other consumer protection­s that are linked to protecting people with pre- existing conditions, such as the law’s ban on charging women more than men or its limits on how much more older people can be charged than younger people.

So, what does Trump’s order do?

Administra­tion officials said Thursday the executive order merely states that it is United States policy to protect people with preexistin­g medical conditions.

That makes the order more of a symbolic statement, with no real effect on health insurers or people with pre- existing conditions.

 ?? Chris Carlson Associated Press ?? PRESIDENT Trump, above in Charlotte, N. C., on Thursday, announced his commitment to protecting ill Americans. But his executive order has no real effect on insurers or people with pre- existing conditions.
Chris Carlson Associated Press PRESIDENT Trump, above in Charlotte, N. C., on Thursday, announced his commitment to protecting ill Americans. But his executive order has no real effect on insurers or people with pre- existing conditions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States