Los Angeles Times

Both presidenti­al hopefuls may be ‘ super- agers,’ study says

- BY JAMES RAINEY

The presidenti­al candidates and their supporters will probably keep belittling the other guy as a doddering old fool, but a group of geriatric experts say in a new paper that both President Trump and challenger Joe Biden appear to have the physical and cognitive tools to make it through four years in the White House.

In fact, the two candidates’ relative good health and other advantages — parental longevity, access to top- notch healthcare and abstinence from smoking and drinking — suggest both men are likely to become long- living “super- agers” who thrive well into their 80s or beyond, according to a draft report by three physicians and four researcher­s with expertise in public health, survival analysis and statistics.

Three of the authors of the paper — Stuart Jay Olshansky, a public health professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago; Dr. Bradley Willcox, director of research in the Department of Geriatric Medicine at the University of Hawaii’s medical school; and UCLA professor Hiram Beltran-Sanchez, an authority on the demographi­cs of aging — wrote previously about how presidents tend to outlive average Americans.

While the candidates are unusually healthy for their age, Biden is projected to live longer because of his fitness regimen, compared with Trump’s relatively sedentary lifestyle and obesity, according to the paper, which will be published in October in the Journal on Active Aging. The journal bills itself as “an indispensa­ble tool for profession­als who are dedicated to older adults living as fully as possible regardless of age.”

Using actuarial analysis and publicly available data on the health of the two men, the authors project Biden has a 95% chance of surviving a four- year term, while Trump has a 90% chance of completing a second term.

“It is our conclusion that chronologi­cal age is not a relevant factor for either candidate running for president of the United States,” the authors wrote. “Both candidates face a lower-

than- average risk of experienci­ng significan­t health or cognitive functionin­g challenges during the next four years.”

The paper’s projection­s were based on medical reports issued by the two politician­s, public details about their personal habits and statistica­l models that predict longevity.

There is no public record of either Trump, 74, or Biden, 77, completing a comprehens­ive cognitive exam. Because no such exam has been reported, the researcher­s concluded that their personal physicians have no concern about their mental capabiliti­es. ( Trump has boasted about passing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, or MoCA, but it is only a screening test. There is not a single test for dementia, the authors note.)

“We don’t know, for certain, if anything was held back or not, so we have to operate under the assumption that their physicians are releasing accurate informatio­n,” said Olshansky, the study’s lead author.

Dr. Nir Barzilai, director of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, said Biden and Trump had performed at an “exceptiona­lly high level” cognitivel­y, for men of their age, during their public appearance­s in the last year.

As white men with high incomes and access to the best doctors, the president and the former vice president have advantages over many other Americans, the paper says. Both had the additional bonus of having one parent live into the 80s and the other into the 90s.

The study projects Biden’s life expectancy at 96.8. It projects Trump will live to 88.6.

Barzilai reached similar f indings to those made by two other physicians who reviewed the records independen­tly and wrote their own summaries: the University of Hawaii’s Willcox and Dr. Paola Rode, a former assistant clinical professor at Tufts School of Medicine.

Like virtually all septuagena­rians, the presidenti­al candidates have had health challenges.

In the late 1980s, Biden suffered cerebral aneurysms that had to be surgically repaired. More than 30 years later, he shows no ill effects, the paper said. His most routine health concern is heart arrhythmia, albeit with no alarming side effects.

Trump’s major health challenge is his weight, 244 pounds on his 6- foot- 3 frame. That compares with Biden’s 178 pounds, at just under 6 feet. Trump has a body- mass index of more than 30, which is considered obese, while Biden’s bodymass number is 24.4, which “places him in the lowest mortality risk group,” the paper says.

The president’s extra weight puts him at risk of developing type 2 diabetes, according to the authors.

The good news for Trump is that a fix — eating healthier and exercising more — is within his control.

Lead author Olshansky urged the 2020 candidates and their supporters not to “weaponize” the issue of age. Even though the campaign will end with the election of the oldest president in history, that should not be considered negative, Olshansky said.

“We see chronologi­cal age as a topic of discussion time and again during elections,” he said, “even though scientific and medical evidence tells us that biological age is far more important.”

 ?? Associated Press ?? PRESIDENT TRUMP, 74, and Democratic challenger Joe Biden, 77, are unusually healthy for their age.
Associated Press PRESIDENT TRUMP, 74, and Democratic challenger Joe Biden, 77, are unusually healthy for their age.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States