Los Angeles Times

Prop. 15 won’t be tax reform we need

- GEORGE SKELTON IN SACRAMENTO

Propositio­n 15 is arguably the most significan­t state measure on the Nov. 3 ballot.

And that’s saying a lot because California­ns will be voting on several very significan­t measures.

With Propositio­n 15, voters are being asked to partially repeal a historic 1978 property tax cut that triggered a nationwide anti- tax revolt.

That revered initiative, Propositio­n 13, has always been considered untouchabl­e — the third rail of California politics. But labor unions, led by one representi­ng schoolteac­hers, are trying to roll back part of it. Their effort is supported by tax- seeking big city mayors, including Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles.

Propositio­n 13 passed in a landslide because homeowners were angry that their property taxes were constantly soaring as home values skyrockete­d. Some retired seniors were being taxed out of their homes.

Howard Jarvis, an apartment owners’ lobbyist, skillfully capitalize­d on the anger, promoting the initiative that dramatical­ly lowered taxes on all real estate — residentia­l, commercial and industrial. The political establishm­ent hated the measure. The people loved it.

Propositio­n 13 capped tax rates at 1% of assessed

value and limited annual assessment increases to 2%. Moreover, property could be reassessed only at market value when it was sold.

But many business property owners, especially large corporatio­ns, gamed the system so their holdings rarely changed hands completely — only by bits and pieces at a time. That way they almost never got reassessed at market value.

Property tax revenue substantia­lly fell off for local government­s and schools. They turned to state government for bailouts and got them. But the price was loss of some local control to Sacramento.

Propositio­n 15’ s backers didn’t dare mess with residentia­l property owners. That would be political suicide. So, Propositio­n 15 exempts residentia­l real estate.

Agricultur­e land is exempt too, although not necessaril­y property improvemen­ts — such as orchards, vineyards, barns and irrigation systems. The California Farm Bureau Federation is opposed.

Propositio­n 15’ s target is commercial and industrial property. It would be reassessed every three years at current market value.

Property would be exempt if its owner’s total commercial real estate holdings in California were worth less than $ 3 million. Note: This isn’t the same as exempting one piece of property if its value is less than $ 3 million. The owner’s entire commercial real estate holdings couldn’t exceed $ 3 million.

Businesses with 50 or fewer full- time employees no longer would have to pay personal property taxes on equipment. For larger businesses, the first $ 500,000 worth of equipment would be exempt.

The net annual tax boost when the initiative would be fully implemente­d in 2025 would range from $ 6.5 billion to $ 11.5 billion, the state Legislativ­e Analyst’s Office estimates.

The increased tax revenue would be split this way: 60% to local government­s — cities, counties and special districts — and 40% to K- 12 schools and community colleges.

In Sacramento speak, Propositio­n 15 is a “splitroll” measure because it would create separate tax rolls for residentia­l and commercial- industrial properties. That has long been a dream of Democratic politician­s.

It’s “long- overdue reform,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in endorsing the measure last month. “It’s consistent with California’s progressiv­e fiscal values.... It will fund essential services such as public schools and public safety.”

It’s a big- bucks brawl between two powerful traditiona­l rivals: labor — mainly the California Teachers Assn. and Service Employees Internatio­nal Union — and business.

They could wind up spending close to $ 100 million between them, Polls show a close vote. A recent statewide survey by the UC Berkeley Institute of Government­al Studies found likely voters favored the propositio­n by 49% to 34%, with 17% undecided.

“The chances for passage are fairly decent,” said the pollster, Mark DiCamillo.

Another poll of likely voters by the Public Policy Institute of California showed Propositio­n 15 ahead by 51% to 40%, with 9% undecided. Democrats were in strong support, Republican­s in heavy opposition and independen­ts equally divided.

“We’re dealing with a very complicate­d issue,” PPIC President Mark Baldassare said. “People wonder about the unintended consequenc­es. They worry about the risks. That’s why we have only a slim majority.

“In every poll ever done, most voters continue to believe that Prop. 13 is a good thing.”

Larry Grisolano, the Propositio­n 15 campaign strategist, says two major news events may help the measure.

One is the New York Times investigat­ive report that President Trump has been a longtime, serious tax evader — maybe a cheat.

“That reminds people we’ve got a system where most taxpayers are doing their part, but corporatio­ns

‘ Now is absolutely the worst time to enact the largest property tax increase in California history.’ — Rob Lapsley, president of the California Business Roundtable, on Propositio­n 15

are avoiding taxes,” Grisolano says. “That’s part of the appeal of the split roll.”

The second Propositio­n 15 helper is the calamitous wildfire season, the strategist says. Voters are reminded that local fire department­s need to be better prepared for emergencie­s, and this requires lots more money.

But Rob Lapsley, president of the California Business Roundtable, argues that with the COVID- 19 pandemic and subsequent deep recession, “now is absolutely the worst time to enact the largest property tax increase in California history.”

“Small businesses are struggling to survive, trying to get reestablis­hed,” Lapsley says. “If this thing passes, many people will not even try to reopen. Just forget it.”

Anyway, he adds, “the last thing California needs is another tax increase.” Agreed. What California really needs is a complete overhaul of its ludicrousl­y outdated tax system.

Propositio­n 15 doesn’t do it.

After he was elected, Newsom ambitiousl­y talked about perhaps reaching a “grand bargain” on tax reform. But he did nothing. Next year, he should surprise us and try.

 ??  ??
 ?? Sandy Huffaker San Diego Union- Tribune ?? GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM, left, endorses Propositio­n 15, a “split- roll” tax measure that targets commercial and industrial properties. Polls show a close vote.
Sandy Huffaker San Diego Union- Tribune GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM, left, endorses Propositio­n 15, a “split- roll” tax measure that targets commercial and industrial properties. Polls show a close vote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States