Los Angeles Times

UCLA scientist shares Nobel

Physics prize results from competitio­n on hunt for black hole at heart of Milky Way.

- By Deborah Netburn and Karen Kaplan

It began as a high- stakes race to peer across 26,000 light- years of space and find evidence of a supermassi­ve black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy.

Leading one team was Reinhard Genzel, an establishe­d astrophysi­cist at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterre­strial Physics in Germany with a part- time appointmen­t at UC Berkeley. His group deployed two giant telescopes operated by the European Southern Observator­y in the Chilean desert.

Nearly half a world away, Andrea Ghez, a young assistant professor who had just started her career at

UCLA, spent a full year persuading skeptical colleagues that she could produce results. Her team eventually got time with the W. M. Keck Observator­y’s twin telescopes at the summit of Hawaii’s Mauna Kea.

Over two decades, the competitio­n fueled remarkable findings. The two teams churned out paper after paper, sometimes separated by just a few months. In search of any advantage, both groups pioneered new techniques to see through the haze of Earth’s atmosphere and penetrate the gas and dust that obscure much of the galaxy.

Ultimately, their observatio­ns of bright stars dancing around a mysterious object known as Sagittariu­s A* revealed that their movements were guided by the powerful gravity of what could only be a supermassi­ve black hole — an object with a mass of 4 million suns crammed into an area the

Nobel Prize, from A1] size of our solar system.

And on Tuesday, it earned both Ghez and Genzel a share of the Nobel Prize in physics.

The erstwhile adversarie­s will share half of the prize money of 10 million Swedish kronor, or more than $ 1.1 million. The other half will go to Sir Roger Penrose, a professor emeritus at the University of Oxford’s Mathematic­al Institute who developed new concepts to show that the black holes predicted by Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity could indeed exist.

Ghez, who is only the fourth woman to win the prize in physics, said that over time, the rivalry between her group and Genzel’s almost started to feel like a collaborat­ion.

“There’s nothing like competitio­n to keep you going, to propel you forward and to get it right,” she said.

Genzel said the contest itself helped persuade other physicists that the black hole results were real.

“The scientific audience was in a perfect position to see us perform the same exercise and judge if the outcome was the same,” he said. “It’s the perfect science principle — when two observers agree, then the audience would believe what we saw.”

Daniel Holz, an astrophysi­cist at the University of Chicago who wasn’t part of either team, said the fact that the two groups used different telescopes with different capabiliti­es added another layer of credibilit­y to their findings.

“It is really reassuring ... that they were really independen­t, and not buddies but really competitor­s,” he said.

Their combined efforts provided solid experiment­al evidence that black holes are more than just a bizarre mathematic­al consequenc­e of Einstein’s most famous work. Einstein himself didn’t believe black holes could be real.

“They are the most extreme objects in the universe,” Holz said. “The gravity is so strong not even light

can escape. These are objects that should not exist in nature.”

But scientists were forced to take the idea seriously in the 1960s after the discovery of quasars. These objects are both extremely bright and incredibly dis

tant, and theorists surmised that the tremendous amount of radiation they emit could only be produced by matter getting sucked into a giant black hole.

Penrose said when he began thinking about black holes, he didn’t start by try

ing to solve complex equations “because then, you know, it’s too complicate­d.” Instead, he approached the problem “in visual terms.”

The solution crept into his subconscio­us as he and a friend crossed a road in London. Their conversati­on paused as they watched for traffic, then resumed when they reached the other side.

Later, Penrose said, he experience­d “this strange feeling of elation” but didn’t know exactly why. He replayed the day in his mind and realized that crossing the road had given him the idea of a critical boundary that, once passed, could not be escaped. It was, he said, “a point of no return.”

“I went back to my office and I sketched out a proof,” he recalled Tuesday. It was published in Physical Review Letters in 1965.

Decades were to pass before the advent of telescopes powerful enough to observe

the goings- on in the center of the galaxy.

Ghez and Genzel focused on a Sagittariu­s A* ( pronounced Sagittariu­s A star), long known by astronomer­s as a mysterious source of radio waves.

Some researcher­s had theorized that it could be a supermassi­ve black hole, but they didn’t know for sure. At the time, scientists didn’t even know if supermassi­ve black holes were real.

“At the beginning the question was, ‘ Is there a supermassi­ve black hole at the center of our galaxy, and by extension, can you prove they really exist?” Ghez said.

To f ind out, she and her colleagues observed the motion of about 100 stars crowded around Sagittariu­s A* to determine how they were affected by its gravity.

“They moved very fast,” said Jessica Lu, one of Ghez’s former graduate students who is now a professor of astrophysi­cs at UC Berkeley. While most objects in the sky take millions of years to complete an orbit, these stars did so “on the scale of a human lifetime,” she said. Ghez’s favorite star, known as S2 or S- 02, has a maximum velocity of 4,350 miles per second.

The speedy stars were key, said Mark Morris, a UCLA colleague of Ghez’s who has been collaborat­ing with her since 1995.

“We were seeing velocities at several percent the speed of light,” he said. That was a strong sign that Sagittariu­s A* was a supermassi­ve black hole, the team reported in 2000. “I have to say we were fairly blown away.”

Within a few years, both teams had strengthen­ed their cases enough that any other alternativ­e explanatio­n could be excluded.

They also demonstrat­ed that if a supermassi­ve black hole existed in our gardenvari­ety galaxy, they were sure to be commonplac­e in the universe, Ghez said.

But there is still much more to learn. These days, astrophysi­cists are using Sagittariu­s A* as a laboratory to explore how stars and gases behave in the presence of such an extreme object, and looking for places where Einstein’s theory might break down.

Over the years, Morris said, each group has spurred the other to bigger and better discoverie­s.

“The competitio­n has been intense from the word go,” he said. “Both groups were keenly aware that the other group was right on their tail or right ahead of them, depending on who was ahead at that moment. It kept both of us honest.”

But Genzel said he would like to see the two teams work together more directly.

“I tried to convince Andrea that we should go from a competitiv­e stance ... to a collaborat­ive stance,” he said Tuesday. “We have exchanged wonderful emails today and will have a COVID- distance champagne event together in the next few days.”

 ?? Fredrik Sandberg Associated Press ?? SIR ROGER PENROSE of the University of Oxford, Reinhard Genzel of the Max Planck Institute and Andrea Ghez of UCLA won the Nobel Prize in physics for discoverie­s that helped prove black holes are real.
Fredrik Sandberg Associated Press SIR ROGER PENROSE of the University of Oxford, Reinhard Genzel of the Max Planck Institute and Andrea Ghez of UCLA won the Nobel Prize in physics for discoverie­s that helped prove black holes are real.
 ?? Aron Ranen Associated Press ?? ANDREA GHEZ at UCLA after she became just the fourth woman to win the Nobel in physics.
Aron Ranen Associated Press ANDREA GHEZ at UCLA after she became just the fourth woman to win the Nobel in physics.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States