Los Angeles Times

Jet pack at LAX? Theories are flying

This summer, pilots saw something — or someone — in the sky. It just happened again.

- By Richard Winton and Samantha Masunaga

It was an otherwise quiet Sunday night at the Los Angeles Internatio­nal Airport control tower when an American Airlines pilot radioed in with an unbelievab­le report.

“Tower, American 1997. We just passed a guy in a jet pack,” the pilot said.

Minutes later came another report, this time from a pilot approachin­g LAX in a Jet Blue airliner: “We just saw the guy pass us by in the jet pack.”

So began one of the most intriguing aviation mysteries Los Angeles has confronted in years.

Those sightings occurred Aug. 30. The case took another twist Wednesday when a China Airlines pilot approachin­g LAX reported seeing a jet pack f lying at an altitude of 6,000 feet. That’s more than a mile up.

The FBI is on the case, as

is a good chunk of L. A.’ s aviation community, which has been buzzing about the sightings.

Though jet packs make frequent appearance­s in popular culture and movies — think Sean Connery’s James Bond and Disney’s “The Rocketeer” — they are actually very rare.

There are only a handful of companies around the world that make jet packs, including a winged device created by former Swiss air force pilot Yves Rossy, which requires him to be hoisted in the air by a helicopter or balloon before he can take off.

There is also a type of hoverboard made by French firm Zapata and f lown only by its inventor, Franky Zapata.

Locally, Chatsworth- based JetPack Aviation has created five jet packs that are worn like backpacks. But they’re not for sale, and Chief Executive David Mayman said none of his competitor­s’ products are sold to consumers, either.

It’s possible that Wednesday’s sighting near LAX was indeed a person f lying with a jet pack. But the reported altitude makes such a f light seem “highly unlikely,” said Mike Hirschberg, executive director of the Vertical Flight Society, a nonprofit profession­al organizati­on.

Mayman said his company’s jet packs are technicall­y capable of soaring to heights of 15,000 feet. But because of fuel constraint­s, they can actually reach only about 1,000 or 1,500 feet off the ground safely. “To f ly up to 6,000 feet from the ground, to f ly around long enough to be seen by China Airlines and then to descend again, you’d be out of fuel,” he said.

Mayman said he knows it wasn’t any of his company’s jet packs because he knows exactly where they are — plus, they are disabled when not in use, so grabbing a pack out of storage wouldn’t be possible.

Instead, he suggests a more likely scenario, an electric drone — perhaps with a mannequin attached.

Thomas Anthony, director of the USC Aviation Safety and Security Program and a former Federal Aviation Administra­tion criminal investigat­or, said the strongest evidence that the LAX sightings are of a person with a jet pack — as opposed to a balloon or drone — came from the American Airlines pilot, who reported seeing the object at 3,000 feet over Cudahy.

The pilot stated he saw “a guy in a jet pack” 300 yards to his left and f lying at about the plane’s altitude.

“That is quite close,” Anthony

said.

He said federal investigat­ors would immediatel­y look at the limited number of jet packs that exist in the U. S. and overseas.

“People in that community will know who has bought these packs,” he said. “If someone is doing this, they are going to have to take off and land somewhere, and there is going to be noise.”

Anthony said he doubts the culprit is using an airport to take off and that investigat­ors should look to out- of- the- way industrial spots for clues.

The FBI suggested the jet pack was f lying in a section of South

east Los Angeles County near Cudahy and Vernon that is dotted with commercial and manufactur­ing businesses.

The f lying range of jet packs is pretty limited, Anthony added, so it’s unlikely it would have traveled any great distance.

After the China Airlines pilot’s report Wednesday, the LAX control tower called in a law enforcemen­t aircraft to investigat­e.

The aircraft was f lying about seven miles from where the pilot said he’d seen the jet pack, according to radio communicat­ions.

But when the craft arrived, no signs of a jet pack remained.

A jet pack could be operated as an ultralight — meaning it would not be registered and its operator wouldn’t need a pilot’s license if it met fuel capacity, weight and speed requiremen­ts, according to the FAA. Ultralight aircraft are permitted to f ly only during the day and are barred from f lying over densely populated areas or in controlled aerospace without FAA approval.

Anthony and others say it’s imperative that the FBI investigat­e the sightings for safety.

“This does represent a very significan­t compromise of the airspace,” he said.

If a rogue pilot were f lying at 6,000 feet without a transponde­r or radio, Anthony said, that would put him or her in the path of commercial airlines maneuverin­g over Los Angeles.

Airliners are designed to withstand getting hit by small objects. But a big metal object is another matter, especially if it were sucked into an engine.

“The engines aren’t designed to consume something large and metal, or something with fuel that’s going to burn or explode,” Hirschberg said. “That could be potentiall­y catastroph­ic for an airplane. You could potentiall­y have an engine explode and bring down the airliner and potentiall­y hundreds of people could die.”

So is what has been reported near LAX really a jet pack? Some experts say it’s possible. In February, a pilot in Dubai reached an altitude of 5,900 feet f lying a Jetman jet pack powered by four mini jet engines with carbon- fiber wings. The pack’s builders say it can reach speeds of nearly 250 mph. After a number of dip and roll maneuvers, the Dubai pilot descended to the ground using a parachute.

Others, though, are more skeptical. Hirschberg said the object seen near LAX could have been a balloon, particular­ly because the China Airlines pilot noted that the f lying object was shiny.

Or it could have been a drone, he said. In recent years, some airports have had to halt f lights after drone sightings. In 2018, London’s Gatwick Airport closed for more than a day after repeated drone sightings.

Drones come in many shapes and sizes. In August 2019, an inventor demonstrat­ed a f lying man drone at a German remote control show. The drone was made to look human with a f light suit stuffed with bubble wrap, and with boots and a lightweigh­t visored helmet attached to a battery- powered drone.

In the U. S., recreation­al users are not allowed to f ly their drones higher than 400 feet, cannot f ly over people or moving vehicles and are prohibited from interferin­g with crewed aircraft.

L. A. airspace is no stranger to unexpected sights. Back in 1982 a guy took f light over Long Beach in a lawn chair lifted aloft by heliumfill­ed balloons. Pilots reported seeing him too.

As for the jet pack sightings, the FBI has so far been tightlippe­d about its investigat­ion.

But on the late August night when the mystery began, the air traffic controller summed up the feelings of many: “Only in L. A.”

 ?? DAVID MAYMAN, Michael Cole Corbis ?? CEO of JetPack Aviation, demonstrat­es one of his devices July 14. Recent reports of someone with a jet pack near LAX have caused a buzz in the aviation community.
DAVID MAYMAN, Michael Cole Corbis CEO of JetPack Aviation, demonstrat­es one of his devices July 14. Recent reports of someone with a jet pack near LAX have caused a buzz in the aviation community.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States