Court restricts abortions in Poland
Decision prohibiting such procedures due to fetal defects elicits protests and criticism.
WARSAW — Poland’s top court ruled Thursday that a law allowing abortion of fetuses with congenital defects is unconstitutional, closing a major loophole in the predominantly Catholic country’s abortion laws that are among the strictest in Europe.
Two judges in the 13- member constitutional court did not back the majority ruling. Activists deplored the decision, and the Council of Europe’s human rights commissioner wrote on Twitter that it was a “sad day for women’s rights.”
Hours later, hundreds of mostly young protesters defied a pandemic- related ban on gatherings and staged a protest before the court with signs saying “You Have Blood on Your Gowns” and “Shame.”
They then walked to the offices of the main ruling conservative party, Law and Justice, and to the house of the party leader and deputy prime minister, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, who is the driving force behind the government’s policies. Police, in heavy presence, cordoned the house off from the noisy protesters, who were calling for the government to step down.
The ruling party will soon propose new legislation to better support women and their children who will be born as a result of the court’s decision, the party’s spokeswoman said.
The court’s ruling came in response to a motion from right- wing lawmakers who argued that terminating a pregnancy because of fetal defects — the most common reason cited for legal abortions in Poland — violates a constitutional provision that calls for protecting the life of every individual.
The court argued that terminating pregnancy because of defects of the fetus amounted to eugenics — a 19th century notion of genetic selection that was later applied by the Nazis in their pseudo- scientific experiments.
It agreed with the plaintiffs that it was a form of banned discrimination when the decision about an unborn child’s life was conditioned on its health.
The challenged law was introduced in 1993 by Poland’s young post- communist democracy as a hardwon compromise between the Catholic Church and the state authorities. It allows abortions when a pregnancy endangers a woman’s health or life, or results from rape or other illegal acts, and also in case of congenital defects. Only the last provision was challenged.
Even before Thursday’s ruling, many Polish women have sought abortions abroad.
Health Ministry f igures show that 1,110 legal abortions were performed in Poland in 2019, mostly because of fetal defects.
In justifying its decision, the court said “there can be no protection of the dignity of an individual without the protection of life.”
The verdict was announced by the court’s president, Julia Przylebska, a loyalist of the right- wing government that is focused on family and Catholic values.
Przylebska’s appointment to the court in 2015 was one of the government’s first steps toward taking control of the judiciary. These steps have drawn condemnation from the European Union, which says they violate the democratic principle of the rule of law.
Archbishop Marek Jedraszewski, known for his strong conservative views, hailed the verdict and expressed “great appreciation for the courage” of the judges in the defense of human life “from the moment of conception to the [ moment of] natural death.”
But opposition lawmakers lashed out.
The head of the Civic Coalition, Borys Budka, said on Twitter that the government used a “false” court of its own appointees to do something “simply inhuman.”
Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Dunja Mijatovic deplored the decision.
“Removing the basis for almost all legal abortions in # Poland amounts to a ban & violates # HumanRights,” she tweeted. “Today’s ruling of the Constitutional Court means underground/ abroad abortions for those who can afford & even greater ordeal for all others. A sad day for # WomensRights.”
Donald Tusk, former European Council president and former Polish prime minister, criticized the timing of such a key ruling during the difficult time of the pandemic.
Police guarded the court’s building as groups of activists gathered outside while the verdict was announced. The groups were small, because COVID- 19 regulations ban gatherings of more than 10 people.