Los Angeles Times

Panel says fatal shooting broke policy

Police Commission rules LAPD officer’s final shots in killing a man weren’t justified.

- By Kevin Rector and Richard Winton Times staff writer James Queally contribute­d to this report.

The Los Angeles Police Commission ruled Tuesday that LAPD Officer Toni McBride broke department policy when she continued shooting Daniel Hernandez during a fatal encounter in April — deciding McBride’s f irst four shots were justif ied, but her f ifth and sixth shots were not.

Hernandez had been involved in a vehicle collision on San Pedro Street near East 32nd Street on April 22 when McBride and her partner arrived on the scene. Video showed McBride repeatedly advised Hernandez to drop a box cutter that he was holding as he approached her, then shot him six times in a matter of seconds.

Hernandez went down to the asphalt after the f irst two shots, but quickly pushed himself up and forward again. McBride then fired four more rounds — the final two coming as Hernandez was on the ground.

The commission’s decision in the controvers­ial case — which it made in a rare 4- 1 split vote — matched the recommenda­tion of staff in the LAPD inspector general’s office who reviewed the shooting, but broke with that of LAPD Chief Michel Moore, who had recommende­d that all six shots be found justified.

It also followed emotional testimony from Hernandez’s mother, his daughter and f ive of his siblings during the commission’s virtual meeting Tuesday, who denounced the shooting, called for McBride to be prosecuted for murder and remembered Hernandez as a doting father and son who helped his parents with their carpeting business.

“When my father died, a part of me died with him,” said Melanie Hernandez, 15. “I will never understand Toni McBride’s actions.” What punishment McBride will face, if any, falls to Moore, who said Tuesday afternoon that he had not made any decisions.

“I will ref lect on this and look back on this investigat­ion again before I make a final decision,” Moore said.

McBride could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

The case had drawn widespread attention in part because of McBride’s persona as a dolled- up sharpshoot­ing inf luencer on social media — where her critics say she glorifies police violence — and because of the inf luence in policing circles of her father, Jamie McBride, who is one of nine directors of the powerful Los Angeles Police Protective League.

Former Los Angles County Dist. Atty. Jackie Lacey, who received millions of dollars from the police union for her failed reelection campaign, recused herself from investigat­ing the shooting, with the California attorney general’s office agreeing to take over the case in August.

The Police Commission’s administra­tive decision Tuesday has no bearing on the attorney general’s review, which is ongoing.

Arnoldo Casillas, an attorney for the Hernandez family, said he was happy the commission found McBride at fault, but that Moore’s stance smacked of favoritism.

“There is a very significan­t appearance of impropriet­y for the chief to be so lenient with the daughter of a very powerful member of the Police Protective League,” he said.

The commission also voted unanimousl­y, and in line with recommenda­tions from the inspector general and Moore, that the tactics used by McBride’s partner — who did not engage Hernandez — broke department policy. Moore, who will also decide if that officer is to be punished, said the officer had not met department standards requiring officers to “work together as a team, and work in that team toward resolving risk to themselves and others.”

McBride had asked her partner about the availabili­ty of less- lethal weapons to halt Hernandez’s advancing toward her but never obtained them prior to the shooting. McBride f ired six times, striking Hernandez each time. According to a report released in the case Tuesday, McBride told investigat­ors she was concerned about the safety of bystanders in the area, and felt Hernandez was determined to harm someone.

Experts in police shootings have largely defended McBride’s f irst shots but have been split on the latter ones. Activists, meanwhile, have denounced the shooting for months, joining the Hernandez family in calling for McBride to be prosecuted for murder. They’ve focused in part on a finding by the coroner that it was the final shots that killed Hernandez.

It is rare for the commission to f ind that an officer broke policy in a fatal shooting, and even more so when the police chief recommends clearing the officer.

During the commission meeting, Hernandez’s oldest sister, Luz, argued that all of the shots were unjustifie­d, as she felt the distance between Hernandez and McBride should have provided “ample time for her to deescalate the situation” or utilize less- lethal weapons prior to opening fire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States