Los Angeles Times

Bats may be clue to halting next pandemic

They are hosts for multiple viruses. But don’t blame them, scientists say — blame human interactio­n.

-

Night began to fall in Rio de Janeiro’s Pedra Branca state park as four Brazilian scientists switched on their f lashlights to traipse along a muddy trail through dense rainforest. They were on a mission: to capture bats and help prevent the next global pandemic.

A little ways on, nearly invisible in the darkness, a bat made high- pitched squeaks as it strained its wings against the thin nylon net that had ensnared it.

One of the researcher­s removed the bat, which used its pointed teeth to bite her gloved fingers.

The November outing was part of a project at Brazil’s state- run Fiocruz institute to collect and study viruses in wild animals — including bats, which many scientists believe were linked to the outbreak of the novel coronaviru­s.

The goal now is to identify other viruses that may be highly contagious and lethal in humans and to use that informatio­n to devise plans to stop them from ever infecting people — in other words, to forestall the next potential global outbreak before it gets started.

In a highly connected world, an outbreak in one place endangers the entire globe, as the coronaviru­s did. The Brazilian team is just one among many worldwide racing to minimize the risk of a second pandemic this century.

To some, it might seem too soon to contemplat­e the next global outbreak, with the world still grappling with the devastatio­n of COVID- 19. But scientists say it’s highly likely that, without savvy interventi­on, another novel virus will jump from animal to human host and f ind the conditions to spread like wildfire.

As this pandemic has shown, modern transport can disperse a pathogen to all corners of the globe in a matter of hours and can help it spread easily in densely populated cities.

As for the next pandemic, it’s not a question of if but when, according to Dr. Gagandeep Kang, an infectious disease expert at Christian Medical College at Vellore in southern India.

She pointed to previous research that found India was among the most likely places in the world for such a “spillover” event to occur, due to population density and increasing human and livestock incursion into dense tropical forests teeming with wildlife.

It’s no coincidenc­e that many scientists are focusing attention on the world’s only f lying mammals: bats.

Bats are thought to be the original or intermedia­ry hosts for multiple viruses that have spawned recent epidemics, including COVID- 19, SARS, MERS, Ebola, Nipah virus, Hendra virus and Marburg virus. A 2019 study found that of viruses originatin­g from the five most common mammalian sources — primates, rodents, carnivores, ungulates and bats — those from bats are the most virulent in humans.

Bats are a diverse group, with more than 1,400 species f litting across every continent except Antarctica. But what many have in common are adaptation­s that allow them to carry viruses that are deadly in humans and livestock while exhibiting minimal symptoms themselves — meaning they are able to travel and shed those viruses, instead of being quickly hobbled.

“The secret is that bats have unusual immune systems, and that’s related to their ability to f ly,” said Raina Plowright, an epidemiolo­gist who studies bats at Montana State University.

To get off the ground and sustain f light requires an incredible amount of energy, with bats’ metabolic rate increasing 16- fold, Plowright said. “You’d expect them to get cell damage from all that metabolic exertion,” she said.

But that doesn’t happen. Instead, bats are remarkably resilient, with many species living more than 30 years — highly unusual for such small mammals.

Plowright and other scientists believe evolutiona­ry tweaks that help bats recover from the stress of f lying also give them extra protection against pathogens.

“Bats seem to have evolved a collateral benefit of f light — resistance to deal with some of the nastiest viruses known to science,” said Arinjay Banerjee, a virologist at McMaster University in Canada.

Although scientists are still untangling the mystery, two leading theories are that bats may have evolved what Banerjee calls “an efficient DNA repair mechanism” or that their bodies may tightly regulate inf lammation triggers so they don’t overreact to viral infections.

Probing the secrets of bat immune systems may help scientists understand more about when bats do shed viruses, as well as provide hints for possible future medical treatment strategies, he said.

Bats and other animals that carry pathogens don’t pose a risk to humans — unless conditions are right for a spillover event.

“The virus has to come out of the host for us to get infected,” said Cara Brook, a disease ecologist at UC Berkeley.

The bad news: Increasing destructio­n and fragmentat­ion of habitats worldwide — especially biodiverse areas like tropical forests — mean “we are seeing higher rates of contact between wildlife and humans,” Brook said, “creating more opportunit­ies for spillover.”

That’s why the Brazilian researcher­s chose Pedra Branca park.

As one of the world’s largest forests within an urban area, it offers a constant interactio­n of wild animals with the thousands of humans and domestic animals in surroundin­g communitie­s. The scientists are studying not just bats but also small primates, wild cats and domestic cats that live in homes with confirmed coronaviru­s cases.

Scientists and government­s would stand a better chance of containing future outbreaks if they had faster notice of when and where they begin, according to Ian Mackay, a virologist at Australia’s University of Queensland.

“Ongoing, constant, nonstop surveillan­ce” — along the lines of the f lu labs set up across the globe by the World Health Organizati­on — could help researcher­s be better prepared, he said. He suggests that labs for virus discovery could regularly sample wastewater or materials from hospitals.

In India, the National Mission on Biodiversi­ty and Human Well- Being has been in developmen­t since 2018 and will likely be launched next year. Abi Tamim Vanak, a conservati­on scientist at Ashok Trust for Research in Ecology and Environmen­t in Bengaluru, said a core part of the plan is to set up 25 sentinel surveillan­ce sites across the country, in both rural and urban areas.

“They will be the first line of defense,” he said.

A varied patchwork of virus surveillan­ce programs exists in several countries, but funding tends to wax and wane with the political climate and sense of urgency.

Among the most ambitious endeavors is the Global Virome Project, which aims to discover 500,000 viruses over 10 years.

The U. S. Agency for Internatio­nal Developmen­t recently announced the launch of the $ 100- million Stop Spillover project, a global effort led by scientists at Tufts University to study zoonotic diseases in Africa and Asia.

One approach that won’t help, scientists say, is treating bats as the enemy — vilifying them, throwing stones or trying to burn them out of caves.

This spring, villagers in the Indian state of Rajasthan identified bat colonies in abandoned forts and palaces and killed hundreds of the animals with clubs and sticks. They also sealed some crevices where the bats lived, effectivel­y trapping them. In the Indian state of Karnataka, villagers cut down old trees where bats tend to roost.

Scientists say those tactics are likely to backfire.

An investigat­ion by the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Ugandan health authoritie­s found that after a mining operation attempted to exterminat­e bats from a cave in Uganda, the remaining bats exhibited higher infection levels of Marburg virus. This led to Uganda’s most severe outbreak of Marburg hemorrhagi­c fever, which is caused by the virus, in 2012.

“Stress is a huge factor in upsetting the natural balance that bats have with their viruses — the more you stress bats, the more they shed viruses,” said Vikram Misra, a virologist at the University of Saskatchew­an in Canada.

Orders issued by Indian forest officials reiteratin­g a ban on the killing of wildlife and informatio­n campaigns to dispel myths were largely successful. But convincing people not to attack bats means dispelling long- running cultural assumption­s.

“People have a lot of misconcept­ions about bats. They’re nocturnal and look a little weird f lying, and there’s a lot of literature and culture built around bats being scary,” said Hannah Kim Frank, a biologist at Tulane University. “But bats aren’t aggressive — and attacking bats doesn’t help control diseases.”

Bats also play vital roles in ecosystems: They consume insects like mosquitos, pollinate plants like agave and disperse seeds.

“We actually need bats in the wild to consume insects that otherwise destroy cotton, corn and pecan harvests,” said Kristen Lear, an ecologist at Bat Conservati­on Internatio­nal.

A better approach to minimize disease risk, Frank said, is to minimize contact between bats and people and livestock.

She suggested that research on when bats migrate, and when new pups are born, could inform decisions about when people should avoid certain areas or keep their livestock penned up.

In North America, some scientists advocate restrictin­g public access to caves where bats roost.

“Cave gating — batfriendl­y gates, built with iron crossbars — can keep humans out and allow bats to move freely,” said Kate Langwig, an infectious disease ecologist at Virginia Tech. “If we leave the bats alone and don’t try to hurt or exterminat­e them, they are going to be healthier.”

Perhaps the most significan­t factor bringing bats into more frequent contact with people and domestic animals is the destructio­n of habitat, which forces bats to seek out new ground for foraging and roosting.

In Australia, widespread destructio­n of winterf lowering eucalyptus trees that provide nectar for fruit bats — known locally as “f lying foxes” — prompted the animals to move into areas closer to human settlement­s, including the Hendra suburb of Brisbane.

There, the bats transmitte­d a virus to horses, which in turn infected people. First identified in 1994 and named Hendra virus, it is highly lethal, killing 60% of people and 75% of horses infected.

A similar chain of events took place in Bangladesh, when habitat destructio­n drove fruit bats into cities, where they spread Nipah virus, which causes severe encephalit­is in humans, by licking date- palm sap from collection barrels.

To potentiall­y reverse the movement of bats, Plowright and colleagues based in Australia are studying ways of restoring the animals’ original habitat.

“Every city in Australia is full of fruit bats that lost their winter habitats,” she said. “The idea is to plant new forests and make sure they are away from places with domestic animals and people.”

Whether the goal is to curb the spread of known zoonotic diseases or to reduce the risk of new ones emerging as pandemics, the strategy is the same: reduce contact between humans and wild animals.

“In the history of COVID- 19, bats have been more victim than victimizer,” said Ricardo Moratelli, coordinato­r of the Fiocruz project in Brazil. “Bats host a large number of parasites, and they deal with these parasites well. The problem is when human beings enter into contact with them.”

 ?? Photog r aphs by Silvia I zquierdo Associated Press ?? A RESEARCHER sets up a net for ensnaring bats at Pedra Branca park near Rio de Janeiro. Scientists are probing the mysteries of bat immune systems and investigat­ing strategies to minimize contact with humans.
Photog r aphs by Silvia I zquierdo Associated Press A RESEARCHER sets up a net for ensnaring bats at Pedra Branca park near Rio de Janeiro. Scientists are probing the mysteries of bat immune systems and investigat­ing strategies to minimize contact with humans.
 ??  ?? AN ORAL SAMPLE is taken from a bat at Pedra Branca, home to a major forest in an urban area.
AN ORAL SAMPLE is taken from a bat at Pedra Branca, home to a major forest in an urban area.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States