Los Angeles Times

U. S. sues Walmart, alleging role in opioid crisis

Justice Department accuses the retailer of filling prescripti­ons that its pharmacist­s ‘ knew were invalid.’

-

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department sued Walmart, alleging the company unlawfully dispensed controlled substances through its pharmacies, helping to fuel the opioid crisis in America.

The civil complaint f iled Tuesday points to the role Walmart’s pharmacies may have played in the opioid crisis by unlawfully distributi­ng controlled substances during the height of the crisis. Walmart operates more than 5,000 pharmacies in its stores around the country.

The Justice Department alleges Walmart violated federal law by f illing prescripti­ons its pharmacist­s “knew were invalid,” said Jeffrey Clark, the acting assistant attorney general in charge of the department’s civil division.

Federal law requires companies that dispense controlled substances to be on the lookout for suspicious orders and report them to the Drug Enforcemen­t Administra­tion, but prosecutor­s say the company didn’t do that.

“Walmart knew that its distributi­on centers were using an inadequate system for detecting and reporting suspicious orders,” said Jason Dunn, the U. S. attorney in Colorado. “As a result of this inadequate system, for years Walmart reported virtually no suspicious orders at all. In other words, Walmart’s pharmacies ordered opioids in a way that went essentiall­y unmonitore­d and unregulate­d.”

The 160- page suit alleges that Walmart made it difficult for its pharmacist­s to follow the rules, putting “enormous pressure” on them to f ill a high volume of prescripti­ons as fast as possible, while denying them the authority to categorica­lly refuse to fill orders from prescriber­s who the pharmacist­s knew were continuall­y issuing invalid prescripti­ons.

Walmart fought back in an emailed statement to the Associated Press, saying the Justice Department’s investigat­ion is “tainted by historical ethics violations.” It said the “lawsuit invents a legal theory that unlawfully forces pharmacist­s to come between patients and their doctors, and is riddled with factual inaccuraci­es and cherry- picked documents taken out of context.”

Walmart said that it always empowered its pharmacist­s to refuse to fill problemati­c opioid prescripti­ons, and that they refused to fill hundreds of thousands of such prescripti­ons.

The federal lawsuit came nearly two months after Walmart f iled its own preemptive lawsuit against the Justice Department, Atty. Gen. William Barr and the DEA.

In its lawsuit, Walmart said the Justice Department’s investigat­ion — launched in 2016 — had identified hundreds of doctors who wrote problemati­c prescripti­ons that Walmart’s pharmacist­s should not have f illed. But the lawsuit said that nearly 70% of the doctors still have active registrati­ons with the DEA.

“Blaming pharmacist­s for not second- guessing the very doctors the Drug Enforcemen­t Administra­tion ( DEA) approved to prescribe opioids is a transparen­t attempt to shift blame from DEA’s well- documented failures in keeping bad doctors from prescribin­g opioids in the first place,” the company said in its statement.

Walmart’s lawsuit alleged the government was blaming the company for its own lack of regulatory and enforcemen­t policies to stem the crisis. The company is asking a federal judge to declare the government has no basis to seek civil damages.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States