Los Angeles Times

Garcetti rejects spending plan

- By Dakota Smith Times staff writer David Zahniser contribute­d to this report.

Mayor says proposal to reallocate LAPD money fails to meet “the call of history.”

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti has vetoed a proposal backed by the City Council to spend money diverted from the Los Angeles Police Department’s budget on an array of services, including sidewalk repairs.

Employing a veto power that he rarely uses, Garcetti called for the money to be focused on addressing racial justice and income inequality, avoiding layoffs and more.

“Far too many of the proposed expenditur­es do not meet the demands of the moment or the call of history,” Garcetti wrote in a letter to the council late Monday about its proposal.

Some council members criticized Garcetti’s action, saying the mayor didn’t give any feedback on the spending plan before Monday.

Councilman Marqueece Harris- Dawson, who represents a district that stretches from Baldwin Hills to Watts, said he would seek to override Garcetti’s veto. That would require 10 council votes.

The council this month backed a spending plan for tens of millions of dollars that was originally budgeted for the LAPD, but reprogramm­ed in response to protests this summer over policing and racial injustice.

That plan, passed on a 13- 2 vote, set aside $ 88 million for youth and recreation programs, neighborho­od beautifica­tion initiative­s, job and business programs, nonprofit services and more.

The spending list wasn’t f inal and was expected to come back before the council in February.

Still, it drew f ire from LAPD Chief Michel Moore and the police union, who criticized it for including funding for public works projects at a time of rising homicides and shootings. The union also accused council members of creating a slush fund for their districts.

The bulk of the money was slated to be spent in South L. A. in three districts, but still allowed council members to fund tree trimming, for instance.

Harris- Dawson’s district, which would receive $ 16.6 million under the proposal, put hiring programs on his potential spending list, as well as park improvemen­ts, street and alley resurfacin­g, tree trimming, and other initiative­s, according to the council report.

Garcetti, in an interview Tuesday, said the proposed list included “a lot of stuff that’s just kind of business as usual.”

“Don’t get me wrong, it’s critically important to someone’s quality of life, but I don’t think people hit the streets for us to f ix the sidewalks,” he added. “They hit the streets for us to get out there and make some lasting change.”

Garcetti, in his letter, said he would get behind a revised spending plan that focuses on community engagement on issues such as racial justice and income inequality; protects jobs for city employees facing layoffs, particular­ly those hired through a program that targets individual­s from underserve­d population­s; and supports anti- violence programs and a pilot program that has mental health workers respond to nonviolent 911 calls.

Harris- Dawson said he wants to use the reallocate­d money in his district for gang interventi­on workers, reentry services, sidewalk repairs and tree trimming. Sidewalk repairs could be done by outside groups, providing jobs in the district, he said.

Garcetti’s letter has a lot of “progressiv­e gobbledygo­ok that doesn’t mean anything,” he said.

“It sounds like from the letter that he is questionin­g the knowledge of low- income people and their representa­tives about what they need in the community,” Harris- Dawson said. “He’s saying he knows better.”

Council President Nury Martinez said she was shocked by Garcetti’s veto, saying the spending proposal came after months of discussion­s with city leaders and community members.

“Residents from Black and brown communitie­s told us they needed more from their city, and this package is one step forward in that process,” said Martinez, who represents the east San Fernando Valley.

Councilman Joe Buscaino, who represents a district stretching from Watts to San Pedro, backed Garcetti’s move, saying, “I support the mayor’s veto because I did not support these [ LAPD] cuts in the first place.”

Following massive protests during the summer over the death of George Floyd in Minnesota, Martinez and her colleagues said they would cut $ 150 million from the LAPD to help “disenfranc­hised” communitie­s.

 ?? Barbara Davidson L. A. Times ?? MAYOR Eric Garcetti said the council’s plan does “not meet the demands of the moment.”
Barbara Davidson L. A. Times MAYOR Eric Garcetti said the council’s plan does “not meet the demands of the moment.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States