Los Angeles Times

Transcende­nt meditation

-

his shot when he tickles the ivories for a famous jazz saxophonis­t, Dorothea Williams ( a terrific Angela Bassett), briefly transporti­ng her and the movie into a state of pure musical bliss. Dorothea hires him to play with her quartet; Joe can’t believe his fortune. But then in a f lash it’s gone, along with everything else, when he takes a fatal tumble and lands somewhere in a dark, formless void.

That void turns out to be “Soul’s” big conceptual and technologi­cal coup, a vision of eternity that will soon deepen to reveal hidden doorways and surprising dimensions. It also enables Docter and his team of artists to find new ways to represent something as transcende­nt, and also as commonplac­e, as life and death.

Like the other souls he encounters on a cosmic escalator to the next world, Joe is represente­d here as a cute, fuzzy, marshmallo­w- y abstractio­n; a few features, including glasses and a fedora, suggest vestiges of his earthly body. So does Foxx’s voice, giving vivid form and feeling to an avatar of the netherworl­d.

“Soul” is Pixar’s 23rd feature and its first to center on a Black protagonis­t — a precedent it embraces with wit, sensitivit­y and a lovingly detailed portrait of Joe’s family and community life. ( Phylicia Rashad voices his hardto- please mom; Questlove plays a former student turned drummer who helps him land that coveted gig.) It’s also the first Pixar film to credit a Black codirector and cowriter, Powers, whose words can also be heard in the forthcomin­g live- action drama “One Night in Miami.”

These milestones aside,

this is hardly the first time Pixar has explored the often-bewilderin­g bureaucrat­ic complicati­ons of the afterlife, which it sends up with customary ingenuity and matter- of- fact razzle- dazzle.

In contrast with the darkly vibrant “Coco,” with its roots in Mexican cultural tradition, “Soul’s” vision of the Great Beyond is pure cool- toned kiddie futurism. It’s a bit like Tron meets the Teletubbie­s, a sly wink from the tech wizards at Pixar Animation Studios to their nearby Silicon Valley counterpar­ts. You can see it in the Great Beyond’s elegance of form and function, its soothing, techno- utopian pastel shades. You can hear it too in the pulsing electronic­a of Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross’ score, which works in sly counterpoi­nt to Jonathan Batiste’s inspired jazz compositio­ns.

All in all, it seems like a pleasant enough place to spend eternity. But Joe, devastated at being cheated out of his big break, has no intention of going gentle into that good night. ( Dylan Thomas isn’t referenced here, though Jesuit writer Anthony de Mello is.)

Exploiting a loophole in the matrix, Joe is transporte­d to the Great Before, where new souls are assigned personalit­ies and interests before they are born. In a developmen­t that may raise hackles in the nature- versus- nurture debate, he passes himself off as a mentor, volunteeri­ng to help other souls find their “spark,” as part of a scheme to find his way back into corporeal form. He doesn’t expect to be paired with the most stubbornly Earth- resistant soul in history, known simply as 22 ( a wisecracki­ng Tina Fey), who is as desperate to avoid Earth as Joe is to return to it.

And so, with nods to classic comedies of spiritual transmigra­tion like “All of Me” and “Heaven Can Wait,” “Soul” becomes an out- ofbody buddy movie, an oddcouple jaunt that slips freely between this world and the next. There are picaresque detours, slapstick- heavy set pieces and a thick veneer of corporate- culture satire, mostly aimed at the Great Beyond’s overseers, each one a marvel of translucen­t forms and squiggly lines. ( They’re voiced by Alice Braga, Richard Ayoade, Wes Studi, Fortune Feimster, Zenobia Shroff and an especially amusing Rachel House.)

Back in Manhattan, there’s also a sign- twirling mystic ( Graham Norton) who’s Zen enough to cruise in and out of the astral plane, and a friendly cat that similarly winds up transcendi­ng the here and meow.

It’s all diverting enough, if also a little familiar. More than a few Pixar devotees — a large and varied swath of the movie- loving public — may feel both comforted and disappoint­ed by the way “Soul” retreats from its early f lights of otherworld­ly fancy and settles into a cozy narrative groove.

Lovably mismatched duos have long been fixtures of the Pixarverse, all the way back to Buzz and Woody; Docter has given us Carl and Russell, Joy and Sadness. There are few more reliable ways of getting a protagonis­t to open up than to saddle them with an irrepressi­ble, slightly obnoxious sidekick from whom they could learn a thing or two. The formula works for a reason.

But it doesn’t entirely work in “Soul,” maybe because in trying to squeeze the mysteries of the infinite into such an accessible, insistentl­y crowd- pleasing format, the movie winds up inadverten­tly exposing its own seams. 22 is an unformed, underdevel­oped personalit­y practicall­y by definition, and Fey’s rat- a- tat comic stylings, entertaini­ng as they are, sound as though they belong more to her than to the character.

Joe and 22 spend a lot of time — and toss off quite a few blink- and- you- miss-’ em gags — trying to figure out her purpose in life. But within the self- help narrative context of “Soul,” her function is a bit too obviously circumscri­bed.

Joe, of course, is more than convinced of his own purpose: Jazz is his passion and his lifeblood. And if “Soul” ultimately feels a bit too carefully manicured to achieve the wild, improvisat­ory sublimity it’s aiming for, its respect for Joe’s commitment is undeniable. It’s there in the movie’s rigorous attention to the musical details, in the exquisite precision with which Joe’s fingers glide across the keyboard, their movements syncing up with the notes we hear.

The best, most nuanced aspect of “Soul” is the way it affirms Joe’s calling while also placing it gently in check and providing a necessary dose of perspectiv­e.

I was reminded of a line from Kurt Vonnegut, whose work this movie sometimes recalls in its cheeky approach to metaphysic­s: “I am a human being, not a human doing.” Joe is more than the sum of his ambitions, and life, the movie reminds us, is more than a rapt nightclub crowd. It can also be a crisp autumn day, a slice of pepperoni pizza, a breeze wafting up from a subway grate, a moment of kindness spared for a worried friend. It’s a barbershop overflowin­g with warm vibes and good- natured insults, presided over by a guy ( Donnell Rawlings) who not only cuts your hair but also answers your need for connection and community.

It’s New York, in other words, a place that eclipses the Great Beyond as “Soul’s” most richly imagined landscape. The city, teeming with life, color and photoreali­stic details, looks more idyllic and inviting now than ever, even and maybe especially for those of us who don’t call it home.

As much as all the incessant body swapping and dimension hopping, this vision of New York may be what marks this story as a fantasy — an escapist evocation of a happier, more carefree moment. But the lingering lesson of “Soul,” a lovely, imperfect movie about life’s lovely imperfecti­ons, is that every moment is worth living to the fullest, this one very much included.

 ?? Pixar ?? JOE GARDNER’S life takes a turn in “Soul.”
Pixar JOE GARDNER’S life takes a turn in “Soul.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States