Los Angeles Times

Worries crop up over shots for farm laborers

Harvest season brings new uncertaint­ies as Blue Shield takes over vaccine distributi­on.

- By Anita Chabria

LODI, Calif. — In the wine region of northern San Joaquin Valley, the coarse spindles of pruned grapevines are sprouting delicate creepers that curl toward wire trellises, and cherry trees are shedding soft pink blossoms.

Along with spring, the second harvest season of the pandemic has arrived. Fields and packing sheds soon will be filled with workers, many of whom are migrants and already traveling up the Central Valley as crops ripen.

It is a “pivotal time” to inoculate farmworker­s against the coronaviru­s before they return to their perilous work, UFW Foundation Executive Director Diana Tellefson Torres said.

But it’s also the moment California is tossing out its existing strategy for vaccine distributi­on — controlled by local government­s — and transferri­ng it to a nonprofit insurance company, Blue Shield.

The collision of harvest season with the Blue Shield takeover has left many community organizers and health officials worried that existing plans, though criticized for being inadequate and uneven, will be abandoned for a different set of uncertaint­ies.

They say the insurance company has done little to alleviate those fears and has not asked for their help — despite the challenges of working with insular farmworker­s, many of whom lack insurance.

“There is no plan we can look at or contribute to,” said Maria Lemus, executive director of the nonprofit Visión y Compromiso, a network of promotores, members of vulnerable communitie­s who are trained health liaisons. Her group has been educating farmworker­s about the virus for months.

To date, the rollout of vaccines to farmworker­s has been hit-or-miss, often driven by local elected officials, unions, nonprofits and employers using their connection­s to get doses into laborers’ arms. The patchwork

system has raised questions about whether vaccines are being equitably shared with farmworker­s, but the pending transition seems to be charging ahead without an on-the-ground perspectiv­e.

Lemus serves on the state’s Community Vaccine Advisory Committee, aimed at ensuring the distributi­on of doses has that viewpoint. She has heard nothing yet from Blue Shield on how organizati­ons such as hers will be involved, she said.

“How can we do this together? They should just ask that question. I haven’t heard it yet,” she said. “Invite me to the party. I am happy to help.”

San Joaquin County Director of Health Care Services Greg Diederich echoed that frustratio­n, calling the transition “opaque.” Though Blue Shield was supposed to begin its overseer role with his county last week, it did not, offering little explanatio­n for the delay, he said. In Fresno on Friday, Gov. Gavin Newsom said the transition for “first wave” counties including San Joaquin would happen Monday.

When the transition does take place, Diederich does not know whether his agency will continue to have the ability to run farmworker clinics or “if ultimately [Blue Shield] determines who does what and gets what, and public health kind of takes a back seat,” he said. The uncertaint­y has prompted county officials in San Joaquin and Ventura to openly ponder whether they can opt out of Blue Shield’s oversight.

Blue Shield referred questions to the state Department of Public Health. A state public health official speaking on background said local health department­s will lose most but not all direct control of vaccines, and the list of those allowed to administer the shots will be streamline­d to ones the insurance company determines are most capable of reaching equity and speed goals. So far, few details of those changes have been made public.

Equity is a dominant concern in vaccine distributi­on, and one of the key explanatio­ns Newsom has offered for putting Blue Shield in charge. For days, Newsom has toured these politicall­y conservati­ve farmlands — where growers are struggling financiall­y and where the recall effort against the governor is popular — promising protection for laborers crucial to the industry.

Despite earlier concerns, Central Valley Democrats have closed ranks around Newsom as recall organizers push hard in the final weeks of their effort. The Central Valley was hit hard by the virus, with more than 66,000 cases in San Joaquin County alone — though the number of new cases is declining.

But the toll on farmworker­s, even young ones, remains starkly disturbing: A recent study found Latino food and agricultur­al workers ages 18 to 65 in California had nearly a 60% increase in mortality during the last year compared with prepandemi­c times, the highest risk factor for any demographi­c in the state. White food and agricultur­al workers saw a 16% increase in mortality, by contrast. The analysis translated to more than 1,000 food and agricultur­al workers dead from March through October, probably from the virus.

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, vice dean for population health and health equity at UC San Francisco School of Medicine and an author of the study, said her concern with centralize­d distributi­on is that speed and efficiency will be valued at the expense of those who are harder to reach. She believes it may be better to vaccinate by place — targeting everyone in a high-risk area, especially those in multigener­ational and close-knit communitie­s, rather than using tiers of eligibilit­y and mass vaccinatio­n centers.

Diederich, the San Joaquin health official, said the county had done an indepth analysis using data from COVID-19 deaths to assign a risk score to every resident, regardless of state tier, and was moving toward that location-based model. Now, he said, he doesn’t know whether that data will be used.

“It’s fine to do things fast,” said Bibbins-Domingo, “but if you are not actually vaccinatin­g where the virus is, you will not be effective.”

That reality has Jesse Sandoval worried that the coming harvest season will be just as dangerous as the last.

The son of farmworker­s who once picked in the fields himself, Sandoval now runs a labor contractin­g company that employs up to 1,800 people each year, mostly in packing sheds where they often work in lines at conveyor belts that turn crops into the neat packages found in grocery stores.

Recently, frustrated that San Joaquin County officials had not yet started inoculatin­g farmworker­s, he called a local politician. That politician, a friend, made a few calls and within days, Sandoval and a fellow labor contractor had pulled together one of the county’s first clinics specifical­ly for farmworker­s, with 750 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

“We just called, I guess, some of the right people,” Sandoval said.

On Feb. 22, as hundreds lined up at a local fairground­s for their shots, farmworker advocate Luis Magaña showed up to watch. He was bothered by how the appointmen­ts had been doled out mostly through employers and labor contractor­s, and promoted only by word of mouth. Working with other advocates, he waited until the end to snag some unclaimed shots for his own contacts.

“This is like a private event,” he said. “What is the process to apply? I want to organize one.”

The Blue Shield arrangemen­t is meant to address such concerns. On Friday in Fresno, Newsom visited one of 11 new vaccine sites run by another state provider, OptumServe, in the Central Valley, promising mobile and small clinics targeting all farmworker­s.

He pointed to 337 community-based organizati­ons that the state and philanthro­pic partners have funded with $53 million to educate agricultur­al workers on the virus. Last week, Newsom announced he was moving 34,000 doses — enough to vaccinate 17,000 people — from an unused Walgreens supply meant for long-term care facilities to farmworker­s, and increasing the Central Valley allocation of vaccine by nearly 60%.

Newsom said in a statement that the additional supplies were making good on his commitment to “meet our farmworker communitie­s where they are, and deepening the innovate public-private partnershi­ps that exemplify the best of California’s civic spirit.”

He sidesteppe­d a question on Blue Shield’s transparen­cy, citing the difficulti­es of a transition period and promising “next week that process begins on a whole new scale.”

But questions about the transition are growing as quickly as the crops.

Tellefson Torres, from the UFW Foundation, one of the community organizati­ons working with the state, points out that migrating farmworker­s may need to get a second dose in a different county than the first. She doesn’t know whether the state has plans to handle that situation.

She also points out Blue Shield’s requiremen­t that vaccine seekers go through the state’s online system is a problem for farmworker­s who may lack both internet access and the computer savvy to navigate a tricky sign-up. Until now, her organizers have handled that. It is unclear whether Blue Shield has its own workaround, though it does offer phone sign-ups.

Tellefson Torres said Friday that she asked the governor personally whether federally funded health clinics that serve the uninsured will receive additional doses for farmworker­s but received no definitive reply.

“We need to ensure that what is on the books, in writing, is actually happening on the ground and that’s what I’m waiting for,” she said.

In the meantime, she and others are pushing ahead with their own efforts, worried their ability to do so may soon be cut off. UFW Foundation on Sunday was working with Santa Clara’s Monterey Mushrooms to vaccinate 500 farmworker­s and planned to do another 500 shots later in the week.

Dozens of other farmworker clinics are popping up across the state, including for strawberry pickers in San Diego and Monterey and date packers in the Coachella Valley. On Feb. 19, a group of 90 Central Valley agricultur­al employers wrote to Newsom, pledging their locations as vaccine sites if allowed.

Sandoval on Thursday watched as his crew processed a truckload of sweet corn grown in Mexico. Powering up an ungainly contraptio­n that spanned half the length of a hangar-like packing shed, two women grabbed green husks one by one, slotting them on a conveyor belt for a saw to slice off the ends before stripping them down to the kernels. Socially distanced but still close, six masked-andgloved workers pulled off bits of silk, while others rapidly packed four pieces at a time into thousands of black plastic trays.

When the cleaned cobs reached Gilberto Hernandez near the end of the line, all that was left to do was run them through the wrapper, sealing each package in plastic. It is work this crew has done for years, even as the pandemic swept through last spring.

But this week is different — Hernandez was one of the fortunate who received the vaccine at Sandoval’s clinic. “I feel good,” he said over the machine’s thunder. “One hundred percent safer.”

 ?? Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times ?? AGRICULTUR­AL workers process sweet corn in Lodi. Community and health leaders question whether COVID-19 vaccines will be equitably shared with California farmworker­s when Blue Shield assumes oversight.
Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times AGRICULTUR­AL workers process sweet corn in Lodi. Community and health leaders question whether COVID-19 vaccines will be equitably shared with California farmworker­s when Blue Shield assumes oversight.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States