Los Angeles Times

COVID-19 strains battle for dominance in U.S.

California and U.K. variants fighting for preeminenc­e are both more transmissi­ble.

- By Melissa Healy

The grim horse race that is the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic has been reduced to a contest between two tenacious coronaviru­s strains: a variant native to California and an import from the United Kingdom.

New data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that the California strain accounted for 13% of all coronaviru­s samples that were geneticall­y sequenced as part of a new federal program in late February. An additional 7% of the samples were the strain from the U.K.

Both versions of the virus have scientists and health officials on edge because they spread more readily than their predecesso­rs and seem to be less vulnerable to some of the medicines used to treat COVID-19. The California strain has also shown signs of resistance to the current crop of COVID-19 vaccines.

Indeed, studies have found it to be 20% more transmissi­ble than other variants in broad circulatio­n. Its enhanced powers of transmissi­on, ability to short-circuit the effectiven­ess of treatments, and ability to compromise the effects of vaccine prompted the CDC this week to declare the homegrown strain a “variant of concern.”

Known to scientists as B.1.427/B.1.429, it exploded in California throughout the fall and early winter as the state battled a deadly holiday surge. It now predominat­es in its home state and two of its neighbors. As of mid-February, it accounted for 52% of sequenced samples from California, 41% of samples from Nevada and 25% of samples from Arizona, CDC data show.

But the U.K. strain is giving it a run for its money — with a projected impact that ranges from uncertain to deeply worrisome.

In January, researcher­s at the CDC predicted that the U.K. variant would become the dominant one in the U.S. by March. Epidemiolo­gist Summer Galloway, the lead author of that report, said Wednesday that it probably accounts for 20% to 30% of the samples being sequenced today.

The CDC does not have an equivalent estimate of how widespread the California variant is, Galloway said.

What the genetic sequencing data do show is that the U.K. variant, known as B.1.1.7, is making inroads across the country and has fueled a handful of local outbreaks. Its documented presence has grown from 76 cases in 12 states in early January to 4,686 cases in all 50 states and the District of Columbia by late February.

The B.1.1.7 variant is thought to be as much as 50% more transmissi­ble than other widely circulatin­g variants, and a study published this week in the journal Nature suggests it is 61% more likely to cause severe disease or death.

The prospect that it could drive yet another wave of infections in the U.S. has helped fuel a determined effort to expand vaccinatio­ns.

At the same time, however, many state governors are loosening restrictio­ns on mask wearing, restaurant dining and attendance at large gatherings.

The new CDC findings prompted Dr. Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Research Translatio­nal Institute in La Jolla, to declare that the California variant “is on its way to obsolescen­ce.”

The fact that the U.K. variant’s transmissi­on rate is higher than that of the California strain means the latter “will be quickly crowded out by B.1.1.7,” he said. In a contest for population dominance, “spreading rules the roost.”

Topol said two other variants — one identified in South Africa (called B.1.351) and another in Brazil (P.1) are likely to meet the same fate “because they do not carry such enhanced spread capacity as B.1.1.7.”

Galloway said neither the South African nor the Brazil variant has gained much of a foothold in the United States. While both are also designated “variants of concern,” neither has accounted for more than 0.05% of coronaviru­s infections geneticall­y analyzed in the country since January.

But in Minnesota, Michigan and Florida, sudden flare-ups of new cases involving the U.K. variant have posed new challenges to public health officials struggling to bring the pandemic to a close with aggressive vaccinatio­n campaigns. Those outbreaks suggest that estimates of B.1.1.7’s greater transmissi­bility have not been exaggerate­d.

In Ionia, Mich., the variant was been at the heart of a major outbreak at Bellamy Creek Correction­al Facility, where 1,600 prisoners are incarcerat­ed.

On Feb. 9, state officials acknowledg­ed an outbreak in which 80 prisoners appear to have been infected by a single employee. By Wednesday, even after the facility adopted an extensive program of testing, personal protective gear and limitation­s of movement, the number of infected people had risen to 425 prisoners and 26 employees, said Chris Gautz, spokesman for the Michigan Department of Correction­s.

All of them were infected with the U.K. variant, Gautz said.

In Minnesota, an outbreak involving the U.K. variant has halted virtually all youth sports in Carver County and put the state on tenterhook­s as it reopens across a range of activities.

On Jan 9, the state noted five cases in its southwest corner. Just over two months later, it has found more than 250 cases in more than two dozen counties across the state. Carver County recorded an overall weekly case growth of 80% from February to March.

In addition to being more contagious, the strain was also associated with higher mortality, “particular­ly among older adults and people with underlying conditions,” said Dr. Ruth Lynfield, the state epidemiolo­gist and medical director at the Minnesota Department of Health.

Minnesota’s experience with the B.1.1.7 variant has also raised concerns about another of its attributes: its apparent ability to spread to and sicken children and young adults more readily than other strains. In Minnesota, one-third of the new cases were seen in people younger than 20.

This pattern has been documented by scientists elsewhere, but it has garnered less attention.

“What we’ve seen really does fit this picture of being very contagious,” Lynfield said.

“We were seeing it among youth athletes and schools. And when we looked at teams, it really did have this high attack rate.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States