Los Angeles Times

Russian oil is as tainted as Confederat­e cotton was

- By Roger Lowenstein Roger Lowenstein is the author of “Ways and Means: Lincoln and His Cabinet and the Financing of the Civil War.” @RogerLowen­stein

One of the disconcert­ing ironies of Russia’s war against Ukraine is that NATO is largely paying for it. While sanctions have restricted other exports, Russia is selling $800 million of oil and gas to Europe a day. (The European Commission did say Friday that it will phase out imports of Russian coal over the next four months.) Energy is not only bankrollin­g President Vladimir Putin’s war, but also bolstering Russia’s faltering economy by boosting the value of the ruble, which has rallied sharply since the war’s early days.

Putin’s reliance on the West recalls the famous (if apocryphal) comment by Vladimir Lenin, that he could obtain the rope to hang the capitalist­s from profit-hungry capitalist­s who would sell it to him.

Europe’s trading with the enemy also recalls a verified historical episode — in the American Civil War. Despite anguished protests from generals such as Ulysses S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman, the United States authorized and pursued a vigorous trade in Southern cotton.

As with Europe now, the Union had its reasons. President Lincoln and his Treasury secretary, Salmon P. Chase, wanted to strengthen the Union’s balance of payments by hawking cotton for hard currency overseas.

They wanted to supply the textile mills in New England, most of which had been forced to close for want of cotton. Similarly, they wanted to avert a depression in England and France, where hundreds of thousands of mill workers had been sacked. The U.S. feared that mass unemployme­nt in Europe would prompt those nations to intervene in the American war on the Confederat­e side.

But Lincoln’s policy was mistaken, precisely for the reason that NATO’s policy of energy imports from Russia is mistaken now. Gen. Sherman said it best: “We cannot carry on war and trade with a people at the same time.”

Lincoln’s policy was designed to sidestep the Confederac­y by authorizin­g cotton purchases from private citizens. Legislatio­n enabled the Treasury Department to issue licenses to designated traders to buy cotton, and other goods, in occupied territory from vendors who swore an oath of loyalty to the United States.

But such oaths proved hardly reliable. Lincoln was swarmed with requests for cotton permits from would-be profiteers, including from family members and political cronies. Approvals were largely haphazard. Once money passed into occupied Southern territory, it inevitably found its way into Confederat­e coffers.

Sherman was contemptuo­us of the notion that all on the other side were not enemies. Although that wasn’t literally true — just as not all Russians support the invasion today — Sherman’s point was that trade strengthen­ed the Southern economy and its ability to sustain the war. In his view, the distinctio­n between military and civilian goods was hollow. As he advised Grant: “Money is as much contraband of war as powder.”

Grant heartily agreed. Notified that a steamer “loaded with sugar and coffee” had received official license to go South, presumably to be swapped for cotton, the general sarcastica­lly wrote the war secretary: “I have positively refused to adopt this mode of feeding the southern army unless it is the direct order of the President.” Lincoln rescinded permission.

Although the North needed the cotton, the South needed the business more. Trade propped up the Confederac­y at its weakest link — its collapsing economy. Russia’s economy could also prove to be its weakest link. While Russia has the troops to sustain a long battle, its people probably would not tolerate a long-term economic depression.

For the North Atlantic Treaty Organizati­on, forgoing Russian energy would impose painful sacrifices — perhaps rationing and lower thermostat­s in winter (and higher in summer). America should be willing to share the pain by increasing exports of fossil fuels and encouragin­g, over the medium term, increased fossil fuel production at home. Halting the humanitari­an crisis in Ukraine should be the priority.

As in the Civil War, when cotton was morally tainted by slavery, Russian energy is tainted by mounting evidence of war crimes. NATO and America should take a cue from Gen. Sherman. The trade should stop.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States