Los Angeles Times

California now largest state to repeal anti-loitering law

-

especially against transgende­r women.

“This is a piece of legislatio­n that will ensure that people are safe on the streets and that we do not continue to be harassed and oppressed by law enforcemen­t,” said Bamby Salcedo, president and CEO of the TransLatin@ Coalition. “It is important to recognize that sex work and sex workers need to have dignity, and that we are also safe as we navigate the streets of the state of California.”

Opponents have argued that the bill takes California down the path toward full decriminal­ization of sex work, and that police use the loitering law to hold johns and pimps accountabl­e for allegedly taking advantage of young women and girls.

“The bill is dangerous, and it’s the first step toward full legalizati­on of prostituti­on. A false narrative was used when the bill was drafted,” Rima Nashashibi, founder and president of Global Hope 365, a nonprofit that focuses on gender-related issues, said during a news conference. “We reject the idea that decriminal­izing loitering will make conditions safer for women and girls who are victims of sex traffickin­g.”

While the proposal comfortabl­y passed the full Senate last fall, the Assembly approved it with only one vote to spare. Several Democrats joined Republican­s in opposing the measure, while some withheld their vote.

That put more-moderate Democrats at odds not only with members of their own caucus, but with the civil liberty and LGBTQ advocacy organizati­ons with whom they’re often aligned.

“The thing with this bill is that it really is a doubleedge­d sword. It’s been presented by advocates, it’s been presented by organizati­ons who are often my allies, as a way to protect our vulnerable communitie­s, as a way to protect particular­ly transgende­r and other vulnerable individual­s from harassment and discrimina­tion,” Assemblyme­mber Cottie Petrie-Norris (DIrvine) said during the news conference.

“But this bill is also one with immense unintended consequenc­es. And those unintended consequenc­es, I believe, do put young women, young girls, and really and truly, our most vulnerable California­ns at a greater risk of human traffickin­g.”

Petrie-Norris said she wanted her fellow lawmakers to instead find a “different approach and a different strategy” to “ensure that we can protect and lift up all California­ns.”

But Ayako Miyashita Ochoa, co-director of the Southern California HIV/ AIDS Policy Research Center and an adjunct professor at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, said criminaliz­ation pushes sex workers into “isolated and unsafe spaces,” with “scant evidence” of positive health outcomes.

Data instead show that criminaliz­ation of consensual sex work leads to increased risk of STIs, HIV and condomless sex, she said, and creates distrust in law enforcemen­t.

“What we’re talking about here is moral legislatio­n. And what we should be talking about is labor protection­s,” Miyashita Ochoa said. “And if we can’t give women and other folks engaged in sex trades that dignity as a worker, then we are just as bad as the people that are taking advantage.”

 ?? Paul Kuroda For The Times ?? A SIGN warns against loitering in San Francisco. California has voided a misdemeano­r law against loitering in public for the purpose of engaging in prostituti­on.
Paul Kuroda For The Times A SIGN warns against loitering in San Francisco. California has voided a misdemeano­r law against loitering in public for the purpose of engaging in prostituti­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States