Los Angeles Times

Texas case threatens abortion pill access in U.S.

- By Lindsay Whitehurst Whitehurst writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Matthew Perrone contribute­d to this report.

WASHINGTON — A Texas lawsuit with a key deadline this month threatens the nationwide availabili­ty of medication abortion, which now accounts for the majority of abortions in the U.S.

The case, filed by abortion opponents who helped successful­ly challenge Roe vs. Wade, seeks to reverse a pill’s decades-old approval by the Food and Drug Administra­tion.

If a federal judge appointed by former President Trump sides with them, it could halt the supply of the drug mifepristo­ne in all states, even those where it remains legal.

“It could have an immediate impact on the country,” said Mini Timmaraju, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. “In some ways this is a backdoor ban on abortion.”

On Friday, a group of 22 Democratic-led states weighed in on the lawsuit, saying that reversing the FDA’s approval of the drug could be catastroph­ic.

A similar-sized group of Republican-led states filed briefs supporting the reversal, saying the ability to order pills by mail undermines their laws banning abortion.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk has not indicated when or how he will rule, but NARAL and other abortion rights groups are preparing for a possible decision shortly after a Feb. 24 filing deadline.

There is scant precedent for a lone judge overruling the FDA’s scientific decisions. A swift appeal of any ruling is likely.

The lawsuit was filed by the group Alliance Defending Freedom, which was also involved in the Mississipp­i case that led to the Supreme Court’s overturnin­g last year of Roe vs. Wade’s guaranteed right to abortion nationwide.

“Our representa­tives in Congress created the FDA and gave the FDA the responsibi­lity to make sure that drugs are safe before they’re allowed on the market. … The FDA failed that responsibi­lity,” said Julie Blake, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom.

The group argues that the FDA oversteppe­d its authority, alleging that the agency approved mifepristo­ne through an accelerate­d process reserved for drugs that treat “serious or lifethreat­ening illnesses.”

In its legal response, the agency said it did not accelerate the drug’s approval, which came four years after the manufactur­er submitted its applicatio­n to market the pill.

The FDA approved mifepristo­ne in combinatio­n with a second drug in 2000 as a safe, effective method for ending pregnancy. Common side effects include cramping and light bleeding. Cases of more severe bleeding requiring emergency care are very rare.

Halting access to the drug more than 20 years after its approval would be “extraordin­ary and unpreceden­ted,” federal lawyers said in a legal filing.

Kacsmaryk, who previously ruled against a program that provided free birth control to minors in Texas, could also issue a ruling that rolls back regulators’ decisions to ease restrictio­ns on the abortion pill’s availabili­ty — decisions based on scientific studies showing women can safely use the drug at home.

In late 2021, the FDA removed a requiremen­t that women pick up the drug in person. Last month the agency dropped another requiremen­t that prevented most pharmacies from dispensing the pill.

Medication abortion accounted for more than half of pregnancy terminatio­ns by the time Roe vs. Wade was overturned, according to research by the Guttmacher Institute, and has grown more necessary since then, said Elizabeth Nash, state policy analyst for the institute, a science-based research group that supports reproducti­ve rights.

“The clinics that are open in the receiving states are stretched thin; they don’t have a lot of give in their capacity,” making medication abortion “very, very important,” she said.

Abortion medication is approved for use up to the 10th week of pregnancy. Mifepristo­ne is taken first, swallowed by mouth. The drug dilates the cervix and blocks the effects of the hormone progestero­ne, which is needed to sustain a pregnancy.

Misoprosto­l, a drug also used to treat stomach ulcers, is taken 24 to 48 hours later. It causes the uterus to cramp and contract, resulting in bleeding and the expelling of pregnancy tissue. The combinatio­n has been shown to be more than 95% effective in ending pregnancie­s up to 10 weeks.

If mifepristo­ne’s FDA approval is reversed, providers could prescribe misoprosto­l alone, which is done in many parts of the world — but that would represent a big shift in U.S. practice, and has not been found to be quite as effective as the combinatio­n of drugs.

Such a ruling could also increase the demand for surgical abortions and further increase clinic wait times, which Nash said are already weeks long in some cases since Roe was overturned.

 ?? Charlie Neibergall Associated Press ?? A LAWSUIT seeks to reverse FDA approval of mifepristo­ne, left, an abortion pill widely used for years.
Charlie Neibergall Associated Press A LAWSUIT seeks to reverse FDA approval of mifepristo­ne, left, an abortion pill widely used for years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States