Los Angeles Times

U.K. premier proposes smoking ban

The plan, for England only, would increase the legal age annually starting in 2027.

- By Charlotte Lytton Lytton is a Times special correspond­ent.

LONDON — For many under-18s in Britain, it’s a rite of passage: loitering outside the corner store, mustering the pluck to try to buy a package of cigarettes without their underage status being detected.

But under a proposal this week by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, those now 14 or younger would never be allowed to smoke legally. In an echo of a law enacted in New Zealand in December, England would increase the legal smoking age, currently 18, by one year, every year, beginning in 2027.

The announceme­nt of one of the most stringent policies on tobacco globally was made to great fanfare by Sunak, who used his speech at the Conservati­ve Party Conference — arguably the most important prime ministeria­l vehicle on the British political calendar — to unveil his plans. Although Brits have broadly expressed support for the idea, with a September poll finding that 71% of citizens favor cigarettes being phased out, it has proved a surprising twist for the Conservati­ves, who had made little mention of the subject before Wednesday.

The proposal would cover England only — not the rest of the the U.K. — and would not include e-cigarettes, which are used by twice as many British youngsters as those who use tobacco cigarettes. Last month, the Conservati­ve Party accepted a $427,000 donation from Supreme 8 Ltd., whose director is chief executive of a vape importer.

England’s ruling party has long made known its distaste for what some deride as a “nanny state,” one where behavior is governed by legislatio­n rather than personal choice. As such, the move is unpopular with many leading Conservati­ves, including Liz Truss, who at the time of the last party conference was midway through her 49-day prime ministeria­l tenure. She says she’ll vote against the bill when it reaches the House of Commons.

Some suggest the announceme­nt was a convenient distractio­n for Conservati­ves trailing in the polls. The unexpected proposal came in the same speech during which Sunak said that a planned high-speed rail network that has already cost $122 billion to build was being partly abandoned.

The biggest surprise is that England might wind up following in New Zealand’s legislativ­e wake. Though the Conservati­ve government was highly critical of former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (under whom the world’s first smoking phaseout was passed), Wednesday’s announceme­nt appeared to signal a turning tide.

Dr. Ayesha Verrall, New Zealand’s health minister, says she is “delighted that other countries are following suit” and remains “incredibly proud of the bold, historic step” the nation took last year. More than 56,000 people have stopped smoking since 2022, she says, a downward trend that means “only 8% of the adult New Zealand population is smoking daily.” Cigarettes, Verrall says, are “a sunset industry in New Zealand and around the world.”

New Zealand, one-thirteenth the size of the U.K., hopes to be virtually smokefree, with 5% or less of the population smoking, by 2025. (Nearly 13% of the U.K. population currently smokes.)

The numbers in New Zealand may also be plummeting in a natural trajectory, as the three central components to New Zealand’s plan — de-nicotiniza­tion of all sold tobacco, a 90% reduction in tobacco retailers, and the law banning anyone born on or after Jan. 1, 2009, from purchasing it — have yet to take effect.

Nick Wilson, co-director of the Public Health Communicat­ion Center Aotearoa at the University of Otago in Wellington, suggests that New Zealand’s plans will probably continue to serve as a role model for other countries, in particular stressing the importance of taking nicotine out of tobacco.

Some are now taking smaller steps.

In January, Mexico introduced a nationwide smoking ban in public places such as parks and beaches, along with a crackdown on tobacco advertisin­g and sponsorshi­p. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administra­tion is expected to finalize a ban on menthol cigarettes — considered a gateway to smoking among some young people — in the coming months. Flavored varieties of e-cigarettes have faced sales restrictio­ns since 2020.

About 11.5% of Americans smoke, similar to the U.K. figure, with more than 16 million adults living with a smoking-related disease, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2018, when 13.7% of the population smoked, the habit cost the U.S. more than $600 billion, the CDC said.

The agency’s 2015 report found that smoking cost more than $1 million in a lifetime, factoring in tobacco purchases and medical costs, most of which resulted from lost productivi­ty from related ailments and health conditions, or premature death. Tax revenue raised by tobacco totaled $11.6 billion in the U.S. in 2020.

Ellie Jackson, a teaching assistant and mother of four from Cornwall in southwest England, said she is “over the moon” about the proposed smoking phaseout and hopes that, in the case of her 13-year-old daughter and her peers, restrictio­ns will mean that “smoking just won’t be on their radar at all. Surely that has got to be a good thing.”

“I can’t understand anyone who would argue against the ban,” added Jackson, 43.

Simon Clark, director of the Freedom Organizati­on for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco, is one.

The “ludicrous” proposals amount to “creeping prohibitio­n,” he says, risking both driving the industry undergroun­d and “infantiliz[ing] future generation­s of adults.” Smoking remains a comfort for many in England, Clark adds. “People have got to be treated like adults, allowed to make their own choices. And if those choices are ‘bad’ choices, that is part of being a free society.”

Others point out that a free society isn’t exactly free when the U.K.’s public health service and the economy are footing a $21-billion bill. Moreover, anti-smoking policies that once seemed unthinkabl­e are now in place, from cigarette bans on planes and in public places to the dire warnings on cigarette packages.

The proposal could prove particular­ly divisive among core Conservati­ve Party members, with an election due to take place by January 2025.

For now, Sunak has put all his weight behind the proposal. But time will tell whether it is really about the benefits of going smoke-free — or simply a convenient promise for him to make in an hour of political need.

 ?? Kirsty Wiggleswor­th Associated Press ?? BRITISH Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s proposal to phase out smoking marks a policy reversal for his Conservati­ve Party. Above, a man smokes in London in 2014.
Kirsty Wiggleswor­th Associated Press BRITISH Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s proposal to phase out smoking marks a policy reversal for his Conservati­ve Party. Above, a man smokes in London in 2014.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States