Hong Kong approves strict national security law
Legislators grant the government more power to quell dissent. Legal experts, U.N. official air concerns.
HONG KONG — Hong Kong lawmakers unanimously approved a national security law Tuesday that grants the government more power to quash dissent, widely seen as the latest step in a sweeping political crackdown triggered by prodemocracy protests in 2019.
The legislature passed the Safeguarding National Security Bill during a special session. The law will expand the authorities’ ability to prosecute citizens for offenses including “colluding with external forces” to commit illegal acts as well as charge them with treason, insurrection, espionage and disclosing state secrets, among others.
It comes on top of a similar security law Beijing imposed in 2020, which has largely silenced opposition voices in the financial hub.
Hong Kong’s Legislative Council, packed with Beijing loyalists after an electoral overhaul, rushed the law through to approval. After the bill was unveiled on March 8, a committee held daily meetings for a week following an appeal by Hong Kong leader John Lee to push the law through “at full speed.” After the vote, Lee said the law would take effect Saturday.
“Today is a historic moment for Hong Kong,” he said.
Critics worry the new law will further erode civil liberties that Beijing promised to preserve for 50 years when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997.
The newly approved law threatens stringent penalties for a wide range of actions authorities call threats to national security, with the most severe — including treason and insurrection — punishable by life imprisonment. Lesser offenses, including the possession of seditious publications, could lead to several years in jail. Some provisions allow criminal prosecutions for acts committed anywhere in the world.
Legislative Council President Andrew Leung said in the morning that he believed all lawmakers were honored to have taken part in this “historic mission.” Council presidents usually opt not to take part in such votes. However, this time, Leung cast his ballot to mark the occasion.
John Burns, an honorary professor of politics and public administration at the University of Hong Kong, said the process reflected the city’s “disabled accountability system, weakened by design.”
He said that lawmakers did examine the bill in detail and that the government adopted some amendments proposed by legislators. However, Burns said, during the debate, many lawmakers focused on ways to expand the state’s reach over national security issues and increase penalties for related crimes. He said executive authorities were happy to oblige them.
“For those who care about accountable government, the process is disappointing, but not surprising, given the centrally imposed changes since 2020,” Burns said.
Simon Young, a member of the University of Hong Kong’s law faculty, said the legislature did more than “rubber-stamping” the law, noting that officials attended lengthy meetings to clarify and amend the bill. But Young said that in the past lawmakers might have sought experts’ input.
“It is regrettable that this was not done on this occasion,” he said.
But Beijing’s liaison office in Hong Kong said Tuesday the legislation signaled a strong “firewall” has been built for the city’s stability and prosperity, allowing it to focus on promoting economic development and improving people’s livelihood. Lee also said other countries had passed laws to address risks when needed.
Hong Kong’s political scene has changed dramatically since the massive 2019 street protests that challenged China’s rule over the semiautonomous territory and the imposition of Beijing’s National Security Law.
Many leading activists have been prosecuted, while others have sought refuge abroad. Influential prodemocracy media such as Apple Daily and Stand News were shut down. The crackdown prompted an exodus of disillusioned young professionals and middle-class families to the U.S., Britain, Canada and Taiwan.
Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, requires the city to enact a homegrown national security law. An attempt in 2003 sparked a massive street protest that drew half a million people and forced the legislation, locally known as Article 23, to be shelved. Such protests against the current bill were absent largely because of the chilling effect of the existing security law.
Chinese and Hong Kong governments say the Beijing-imposed law restored stability after the 2019 protests.
Officials insist the new security law balances security with safeguarding rights and freedoms. The city government said that it’s needed to prevent a recurrence of the protests, and that it will affect only “an extremely small minority” of residents.
The new law includes tough penalties for people convicted of endangering national security for some offenses if they’re found to be working with foreign governments or organizations as opposed to acting on their own. For example, it targets those who damage public infrastructure with the intent to endanger the state and could be jailed for 20 years, or, if they colluded with external forces, for life. In 2019, protesters occupied Hong Kong’s airport and vandalized railway stations.
Businesspeople and journalists have expressed fears that such a broad law will affect their day-to-day work.
Observers are closely watching to see whether authorities will extend enforcement to other professional sectors and how it will affect Hong Kongers’ liberties.
The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk was quick to denounce the accelerated adoption of the bill.
“For such important legislation, with a significant impact on human rights to be passed without a thorough process of deliberation and meaningful consultation is a regressive step for the protection of human rights in Hong Kong,” he said in a statement.
U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement that China’s takeover of the city’s “legal, economic and political system makes clear that Hong Kong is no longer a place safe for anyone who believes in democracy nor a viable place to conduct global business.”
Last week, a group of four U.S. lawmakers who lead two congressional panels on China urged Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken to review travel advisories to Hong Kong, sanction Hong Kong officials responsible for the legislation, and strip diplomatic privileges and immunities from the three Hong Kong offices in the U.S.