Will Disney proxy effort be a costly distraction?
Stock recovery seems to boost Bob Iger, but Nelson Peltz’s Trian continues to push for a board presence.
The latest fight over the future of Walt Disney Co. is headed into the home stretch, with an April 3 shareholder meeting fast approaching. This is the moment when investors will decide whether to shake up the Disney board by voting to replace one or more directors with someone dissatisfied with the company’s performance.
A recent recovery in Disney’s share price seemed to sew up a likely victory for Chief Executive Bob Iger and the company’s nominees, with analysts speculating that it would deflate the proxy campaign waged by billionaire Nelson Peltz, whose New York-based Trian Fund Management holds $3.5 billion in Disney stock. But if Disney were certain that Peltz’s quest is purely a quixotic one, it’s not acting like it. Instead, the company is doing everything it can to undermine Peltz’s efforts.
It’s easy enough to understand why Iger would bristle at the thought of an outsider coming in to criticize his strategy as he tries to turn the company around. Iger’s first 15-year run as CEO made Disney the envy of the entertainment industry, with killer brands and unrivaled box-office success. Now he’s back after the botched transfer of power to Bob Chapek, and the company has been struggling, as Peltz has repeatedly pointed out. Iger’s legacy is at stake.
Making matters worse and personal for Iger, Peltz is joined by former Disney Chief Financial Officer Jay Rasulo and ex-Marvel Entertainment chief Ike Perlmutter, both of whom left on bad terms.
Disney, naturally, wants a decisive victory, and it’s not taking any chances in communications with investors, highlighting the strides it has made to improve performance while also hitting hard against its opponents. Working in Iger’s favor is the fact that Disney’s prospects have improved lately.
Iger has received public support from JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and the heirs of Walt and Roy Disney, including Abigail Disney, Walt’s grandniece and a frequent critic of the company’s executive compensation practices. On Monday, Disney issued a statement summarizing a report from corporate governance advisory firm Glass, Lewis & Co., which endorsed Disney’s nominees. “We struggle to see many of Trian’s intentions as representing a likely net gain for investors,” Glass Lewis said.
Last week, Disney unveiled a political-style attack ad aimed at Peltz and his co-nominee, Rasulo, which blasted the former’s credentials and accomplishments on the boards of other companies and characterized the latter as a bitter ex-employee who left after being “passed over for a promotion nearly a decade ago.”
The video also made sure to hammer home the association with Perlmutter, who was ousted last year and whose rivalry with Iger is well documented. Perlmutter owns the majority of the Disney shares held by Trian.
Quoth the ominous voiceover: “Nelson Peltz has a long history of attacking companies to the ultimate detriment of shareholder value.”
Peltz and his allies bristled at the ad’s characterization, describing it as hyperbolic mudslinging.
“In our view, this charged and disingenuous rhetoric seems calculated to distract shareholders from Disney’s poor track record and sidestep accountability,” Trian said in a statement.
Peltz and Rasulo are not looking to replace or oust Iger but rather are vying to topple board members Michael B.G. Froman and Maria Elena Lagomasino.
“Neither of them has helped Disney retain its leadership position in the media landscape,” Trian said in a letter to Disney shareholders.
Further, Trian says Disney has mischaracterized its performance history, which has included investments in DuPont, Heinz and Wendy’s. Citing a lengthy white paper, Trian has said that for the 11 of the firm’s investments in which Peltz joined the boards, the companies delivered 17% average annualized returns through the end of 2023.
Peltz isn’t the type of investor to get in for a quick flip. He’s known instead for taking long-term positions in companies. And some corporate leaders who fought to avoid Peltz joining their boards ended up praising him after he succeeded. Trian’s website includes testimonials from former Heinz CEO Bill Johnson and Mondelez International boss Dirk Van de Put.
“He’s not a corporate raider like Carl Icahn,” Los Angeles investor Lloyd Greif told The Times last month. “I think he’s much more experienced in running companies.”
It’s clear that Disney has disappointed in recent years. Sure, the stock is up more than 35% from six months ago. But it’s still down from the same time in 2022, the year the bloom was coming off the streaming rose. Compared with five years ago, the stock is essentially flat. The company has under-performed the S&P 500 over the last five years.
Trian’s diagnoses of Disney’s ailments are varied, and some are difficult to dispute. For example, Peltz’s missives frequently note that Disney has had a poor track record of succession planning, and even the company’s staunchest defenders would be hard pressed to argue with that assertion.
Other critiques are less clear-cut but defensible. For example, Trian contends that Disney’s $71-billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox was “strategically flawed,” in part because it represented a doubling down on linear networks at a time when the industry was getting walloped by cordcutting.
Although Disney can say that Iger’s deal with Rupert Murdoch got it prized assets, including “Avatar,” “The Simpsons” and control of Hulu, the purchase has been a mixed bag. Disney has effectively exited the Indian media business it acquired with the Fox deal by merging it into a Reliance Industries-controlled joint venture, taking a writedown on Star India.
Peltz & Co. argue that Disney was late in recognizing the threat of streaming, though Iger was ahead of the curve among legacy media CEOs in candidly acknowledging the impact of changing audience behavior on linear networks, particularly ESPN.
Trian says Disney pursued streaming subscribers with an overly aggressive pricing scheme ($7 a month was too low), a point that Iger himself has admitted. Peltz claims that recent initiatives — the $1.5-billion partnership with Epic Games, the unnamed sports streaming joint venture with Warner Bros. Discovery and Fox Corp. — are half-baked.
Trian’s 133-page document on Disney spends much ink on the company’s problems but is short on remedies.
The paper suggests that Disney should consider combining Hulu and Disney+ into one entity, evaluate the viability of Hulu’s live TV product and improve theatrical film performance — surely ideas the current leadership group has thought of already.
As far as succession planning goes, the Glass Lewis report gives Disney the edge over Trian’s plan.
Iger will most likely prevail with the board Disney wants, without Peltz, Rasulo or any of the three nominees put forth by another shareholder, Blackwells Capital. Regardless of how the boardroom skirmish turns out, Iger still has a lot to prove before we can judge his second term.